Originally posted by StumpsStrongSafety
Originally posted by PING72
Wow, a lot of 4-letter words floating around. Always heard that swearing was a sign of low intelligence
that's a ridiculous theory. swearing is a sign of low intelligence in the same way that overusing the word, "like," is a sign of low intelligence. sure, it's vain language, but i don't know of a single person who doesn't have flaws in the way they construct sentences (i.e. you're missing the subject in both of your sentences and i tend to not use capitalization). i'm not implying that you're stupid and i obviously think i'm pretty smart.
if you want to classify foul language as a sign of low intelligence because it's superfluous, you're going to end up plucking the speck from your neighbor's eye when there is a log in your own.
in the immortal words of barry bonds, "blah blah blah, clean your own closet first."
Using a longer than necessary rebuttle when a short response will do is a sign of low intelligence too I hear.
Originally posted by PING72
Wow, a lot of 4-letter words floating around. Always heard that swearing was a sign of low intelligence
that's a ridiculous theory. swearing is a sign of low intelligence in the same way that overusing the word, "like," is a sign of low intelligence. sure, it's vain language, but i don't know of a single person who doesn't have flaws in the way they construct sentences (i.e. you're missing the subject in both of your sentences and i tend to not use capitalization). i'm not implying that you're stupid and i obviously think i'm pretty smart.
if you want to classify foul language as a sign of low intelligence because it's superfluous, you're going to end up plucking the speck from your neighbor's eye when there is a log in your own.
in the immortal words of barry bonds, "blah blah blah, clean your own closet first."
Using a longer than necessary rebuttle when a short response will do is a sign of low intelligence too I hear.
