Does a Center have any loss by playing Guard or vice versa?
Octowned
offline
offline
Yes there is a loss.
Likely not enough for it to matter - by that I mean the best way to build a team is to just make 10 Cs as your offensive line. Plenty of teams do it.
Likely not enough for it to matter - by that I mean the best way to build a team is to just make 10 Cs as your offensive line. Plenty of teams do it.
marcaodl
offline
offline
Originally posted by Octowned
Yes there is a loss.
Likely not enough for it to matter - by that I mean the best way to build a team is to just make 10 Cs as your offensive line. Plenty of teams do it.
not true... a C would be good to bkup out of position, but as tarter wouldnt do better than the player of the specified position.
Yes there is a loss.
Likely not enough for it to matter - by that I mean the best way to build a team is to just make 10 Cs as your offensive line. Plenty of teams do it.
not true... a C would be good to bkup out of position, but as tarter wouldnt do better than the player of the specified position.
Djinnt
offline
offline
Originally posted by marcaodl
Originally posted by Octowned
Yes there is a loss.
Likely not enough for it to matter - by that I mean the best way to build a team is to just make 10 Cs as your offensive line. Plenty of teams do it.
not true... a C would be good to bkup out of position, but as tarter wouldnt do better than the player of the specified position.
Yeah but the C has better major attributes for G than G does.
I don't agree with OT being played by a C though.
Originally posted by Octowned
Yes there is a loss.
Likely not enough for it to matter - by that I mean the best way to build a team is to just make 10 Cs as your offensive line. Plenty of teams do it.
not true... a C would be good to bkup out of position, but as tarter wouldnt do better than the player of the specified position.
Yeah but the C has better major attributes for G than G does.
I don't agree with OT being played by a C though.
Octowned
offline
offline
Here is the thing for an OT - if you have the discipline to stop yourself at 60 on str/blk then move on to the relevant minors that an OT needs, the saved SP will easily make up for whatever losses in natural gains on vis/conf/agi, and str/blk will catch up on their own anyway.
A 10 C o-line is optimal, just have to build them correctly, not like 10 centers lol
A 10 C o-line is optimal, just have to build them correctly, not like 10 centers lol
mandyross
offline
offline
Originally posted by Octowned
A 10 C o-line is optimal, just have to build them correctly, not like 10 centers lol
The problem is that the moment people start to do well with this is will be nerfed by the OOP being increased.
I'm happy with my G's
A 10 C o-line is optimal, just have to build them correctly, not like 10 centers lol
The problem is that the moment people start to do well with this is will be nerfed by the OOP being increased.
I'm happy with my G's
Dudly
offline
offline
Originally posted by mandyross
Originally posted by Octowned
A 10 C o-line is optimal, just have to build them correctly, not like 10 centers lol
The problem is that the moment people start to do well with this is will be nerfed by the OOP being increased.
I'm happy with my G's
This is a fact, Bort doesn't like little loop holes like this and closes them when he notices people taking advantage of them.
Originally posted by Octowned
A 10 C o-line is optimal, just have to build them correctly, not like 10 centers lol
The problem is that the moment people start to do well with this is will be nerfed by the OOP being increased.
I'm happy with my G's
This is a fact, Bort doesn't like little loop holes like this and closes them when he notices people taking advantage of them.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
