User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
tjsexkitten82
offline
Link
 
I stole this idea from AAA#2, probably the only good idea they've ever had and I sincerely doubt they knew it was a good one when they had it.

At any rate, I tend to trust the judgment of the owners who have scouted each of these teams, and played against most of them, more than I do some statistical formula that, like the BCS, can turn out rather head-scratching results. True biases will enter the equation, but assuming enough owners vote, these should cancel out, and I will be sure to harass any owner who votes his team ridiculously high.

So without further ado, let's get this thing going. Owners, please submit your votes to me via PM. You must rank ALL 32 teams in order for your vote to count. I'll put them in an excel spreadsheet and publish once I've got 10 votes.

EDIT: This ended up falling far short of the required votes, for which I was waiting. I'll publish what I got - remember, this was for week 14 - and please try and get your votes in earlier next week.

Coaches Poll for Week 14
1. USA Vacationers (1.25)
2. Dubrovnik Destroyers (1.75)
3. Moscow Massacre (3)
4. MXCA Cybernationists (4.5)
5. Dogdandy Dragons (5)
6. Tenerife Thunderbirds (6)
7. Scotch Cocks (7.5)
8. Fox News (7.75)
9. Shiner Bocks (9.25)
10. Berlin Hounds from Hell (9.5)
11. Morland Metal (10.5)
12. Hellsinki Hellraisers (12.75)
13. Moscow Communists (13)
14. Carolina Leatherwrecks (13.5)
15. Desert Vultures (15.25)
T-16. Mobile Red Elephant Club (16.25)
T-16. Vaadwaur Phoenix (16.25)
18. KGB All Stars (18.5)
19. Moscow Eagles (19.75)
20. New World Order (20)
21. Tallinn Dream (20.25)
22. Joao Pessoa Boobs (21.75)
23. Odessa Stunners (22.75)
24. Collierville Hammers (24)
25. biguglia black heads (25.5)
26. Donetsk Lizards (26)
27. Chattanooga Lookouts (26.5)
T-28. Balkan Anarchy (28.5)
T-28. Moscow Warriors (28.5)
30. Black Russian Terriers (30)
31. Tidy Enforcement Agency (31)
32. Emmaus Green Fighting Hornets (32)

**(average rank in parenthesis)**
Last edited May 24, 2008 10:21:24
 
Malachorn
offline
Link
 
Bah. Sounds like too much work. Count me out.
...rank ALL the teams? You sure?
 
tjsexkitten82
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Malachorn
Bah. Sounds like too much work. Count me out.
...rank ALL the teams? You sure?


Or, if you're lazy, just rank the teams in your conference. And if one conference is lazier than another, it just won't get a coaches' poll. :-P
 
Warhawk
Moderator
offline
Link
 
You're such a pleasant guy, Malachorn.
 
Malachorn
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Warhawk
You're such a pleasant guy, Malachorn.


Wow. Where'd that come from!?!?!
 
tjsexkitten82
offline
Link
 
I've got 2 coaches polls in so far, and can already see some interesting differences. Keep them coming!
 
J Bo
offline
Link
 
Dubrovnik is working on theirs. PM the owners and link them to this thread.
 
J Bo
offline
Link
 
You should have ours now.
 
Royce R
offline
Link
 
ours is in

but only zeta conference, dont know alpha good enough would just vote straight up rankings for them.
Last edited May 23, 2008 09:22:55
 
J Bo
offline
Link
 
I'm not sure how this is supposed to work if you have some people including 1 conference and some people including both.

Even if you dont know the conference you could still look at records and include them in your rankings. Otherwise tjking is gonna have a real hard time tallying votes.

You think SEC coaches know the Big12 teams as well as other SEC teams? I don't, but they still find a way to put them in their rankings.
Last edited May 23, 2008 09:29:04
 
Royce R
offline
Link
 
ok i'll add it
 
Kutzy
Child Support
offline
Link
 
I put the Berlin Hounds at #32. YOu can fill in the rest however you choose.
 
J Bo
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Kutzy
I put the Berlin Hounds at #32. YOu can fill in the rest however you choose.


Is it too difficult for you to form an opinion about your competition?
 
Kutzy
Child Support
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by J Bo
Originally posted by Kutzy

I put the Berlin Hounds at #32. YOu can fill in the rest however you choose.


Is it too difficult for you to form an opinion about your competition?


Is it too difficult for you to realize sarcasm?
 
Painmaker
offline
Link
 
He probably just figured that was an accurate ranking, so you must have been serious
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.