User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Europe West BBB Leagues > Europe West BBB #4 > Shefpans Useless Preseason Predictions for Alpha
Page:
 
Shefpan
offline
Link
 
I assigned a value of 1-5 to five categories.

a - Team Rating
57 = 5
54 = 4
51 = 3
48 = 2
45 and below = 1

b - Average Offensive Starter Level
35+ = 5
32-35 = 4
29-32 = 3
26-29 = 2
below 26 = 1

c - Average Defensive Starter Level
35+ = 5
32-35 = 4
29-32 = 3
26-29 = 2
below 26 = 1

d - Owner/GMs
Long time Professional GM/ownership with trophies = 5 (no one has this)
Long time high level GM/ownership with obvious winning experience = 4
Some evidence of winning experience on several GMs = 3
Little evidence of winning experience or several GMs with none = 2
One or two GMs (including owner) with no evidence of winning experience = 1

e - Depth
45+ players = 5
40+ players = 4
36 + players = 3
32 + players = 2
less than 32 players = 1



Geats..........21
Annihilators...20
Project........19
Aces...........19
Vikings........18
Crusaders......17
Mambas.........17
Elites.........16
FireCrackers...15
Scousers.......15
Raptors........15
DareDevils.....14
Dukes..........14
Invaders.......13
Defenders......11
Blackbirds.....8

Feel free to argue away as this was by no means scientific and is not guaranteed to be accurate in the slightest!
 
CardinalX
offline
Link
 
it's a unique approach and far from useless

good starting point

good for discussion
 
Shefpan
offline
Link
 
I copied the system from my old league forum...just changed the levels around.
 
vigilantsky
offline
Link
 
I guess that means the Geats are the to be taken down
 
Shefpan
offline
Link
 
Well, I hope we all gun for each other...it makes it worth logging in every day when you don't have a bunch of CPUs or gutted teams on the schedule.
 
vigilantsky
offline
Link
 
That is true but the team at the top is the to be beat, hopefully that will be my team
 
Shefpan
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by vigilantsky@hotmail.com
That is true but the team at the top is the to be beat, hopefully that will be my team


Just turn your monitor upside down and shoot for the Blackbirds!
 
vigilantsky
offline
Link
 

Just turn your monitor upside down and shoot for the Blackbirds!


But if I turn my monitor up side down it will look like we are are the bottom lol

I see we are palying afew of the same teams in preseason.
 
Shefpan
offline
Link
 
Yeah, I'm pissed about getting AC Milan in our first game though...it seems like every year I've gotten the top 1 or 2 team from the other conference regardless of my team's record!
 
vigilantsky
offline
Link
 
Play the best first then who ever you get after that should be easy.
We have quite a nice little run of games so I think my team could get off to a good start but they will be tough games.
Last edited Apr 17, 2009 13:22:55
 
Shefpan
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by vigilantsky@hotmail.com
Play the best first then who ever you get after that should be easy.
We have quite a nice little run of games so I think my team could get off to a good start but they will be tough games.


Yeah, but that one game can make a difference in the seeding...especially as tight as our conference is this season!
 
vigilantsky
offline
Link
 
But look at it this way its best to play them early than play them near then end in case you have to win it.
But i'm sure you guys are gonna beat them any way as ALPHA is the league to be in
 
dook
offline
Link
 
Just curious as to how many points were accounted for us using this:

d - Owner/GMs
Long time Professional GM/ownership with trophies = 5 (no one has this)
Long time high level GM/ownership with obvious winning experience = 4
Some evidence of winning experience on several GMs = 3
Little evidence of winning experience or several GMs with none = 2
One or two GMs (including owner) with no evidence of winning experience = 1


TIA

 
Shefpan
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by dook1e
Just curious as to how many points were accounted for us using this:

d - Owner/GMs
Long time Professional GM/ownership with trophies = 5 (no one has this)
Long time high level GM/ownership with obvious winning experience = 4
Some evidence of winning experience on several GMs = 3
Little evidence of winning experience or several GMs with none = 2
One or two GMs (including owner) with no evidence of winning experience = 1


TIA



If I remember correctly, I think most teams had a 3...some a 4 and some a 2 or 1. I couldn't tell you exactly who had what unless I went back and looked at every owner and GM in the conference and I'm not feeling ambitious enough to do that twice.
 
Tarrin
offline
Link
 
Great job Shefpan. I look forward to the future predictions.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.