Warrior General Games

Rank … Strength of Record … Quality of Play … Team
1 ......................... 114 ........................... 119.27 .................... Burma Birdflu
2 ......................... 100 ........................... 18.4 .................... Singapore Sling
3 ......................... 89 ........................... 4.27 .................... East Nusa Tenggara Shadow Dragons
4 ......................... 86 ........................... 15.12 .................... Tet Offensive
5 ......................... 79 ........................... -205.19 .................... Vietnamese Sweatshop
6 ......................... 71 ........................... -4.63 .................... Bacolod Rangers
7 ......................... 56 ........................... 7.89 .................... Portland Microbrews
8 ......................... 53 ........................... -14.05 .................... Chengdu Vipers
9 ......................... 53 ........................... -82.37 .................... Padang Poontang
10 ......................... 45 ........................... 31.93 .................... Oakland Naughty Ottsel
11 ......................... 44 ........................... 7.53 .................... Boogaloo's Disco Warriors
12 ......................... 37 ........................... -83.42 .................... Toungoo Tigers
13 ......................... 36 ........................... -79.04 .................... Phuket Vandals
14 ......................... 27 ........................... -16.78 .................... Canisteo Stodieans
15 ......................... 22 ........................... -133.27 .................... Angkor Arctic Wolves
16 ......................... 14 ........................... 20.33 .................... Kendari Dragons
17 ......................... 14 ........................... -90.49 .................... Sarnia Imperials
18 ......................... -23 ........................... 15.79 .................... Golden Hill Bones
19 ......................... -27 ........................... 60.52 .................... Bangkok Barfines
20 ......................... -28 ........................... -87.48 .................... Palembang Panthers
21 ......................... -31 ........................... -1.84 .................... Saigon Dragons
22 ......................... -36 ........................... 38.71 .................... Sydney Sharks
23 ......................... -41 ........................... 7.07 .................... Maui TetraHConnoisseurs
24 ......................... -47 ........................... 64.43 .................... Manila Gorillas
25 ......................... -57 ........................... 21.48 .................... Bandung Deadliest Catch
26 ......................... -59 ........................... 11.19 .................... Thailand Poison
27 ......................... -67 ........................... 16 .................... Play Cu Sad Pandas
28 ......................... -94 ........................... 54.84 .................... 69Mafia
29 ......................... -97 ........................... 7.24 .................... Minnesota Legend
30 ......................... -104 ........................... 111 .................... Kenosha Bootleggers CPU
31 ......................... -111 ........................... 122.33 .................... Hanoi Heat CPU
32 ......................... -118 ........................... 43.26 .................... Cocos Island Polecats

I mean week 16, lol.

Hey how is the quality of play determined and why is ours so low?

As I've come to understand it, it's based on a formula that calculates how much you should beat a team by, or how close your losses should be, then compares that to the actual outcome. I'm not sure exactly how it's calculated, but I do recall in one of the early Power Rankings posts that this was the gist of it.

P.S. guttermouth: I was a little leery of these formulas and rankings for about 2/3 of the season, but it seems to have squared itself away at the end of the season. Thank you for taking the time to do these, it's been intriguing to see how everything has come together, and I know it can be time consuming.

No problem.

"Strength of Record

Equation

Strength of Record = (Total number of wins of opponents you have defeated) - (Total number of losses of opponents that have beaten you)

Definition

This is measure of how good a team is. It rewards beating good teams and punishes for losing to bad teams.
Quality of Play

Equation

Quality of Play = (Actual total point differential) - (Predicted total point differential)

Definition

It is essentially how many points (total) that team has beaten (or not beaten) the spread by. I feel it is a good indicator of whether a team is playing better or worse than expected."

Originally posted by guttermouth70
"Strength of Record

Equation

Strength of Record = (Total number of wins of opponents you have defeated) - (Total number of losses of opponents that have beaten you)

Definition

This is measure of how good a team is. It rewards beating good teams and punishes for losing to bad teams.
Quality of Play

Equation

Quality of Play = (Actual total point differential) - (Predicted total point differential)

Definition

It is essentially how many points (total) that team has beaten (or not beaten) the spread by. I feel it is a good indicator of whether a team is playing better or worse than expected."

Holy crap man Nice work for doing this!!