So how do you all think your team is doing compared to what you thought at the beginning of the season?
boldtroll
offline
offline
Siena I think is doing about 2 or 3 games above where I'd thought we'd be.
Our win over Chernobyl was huge!
(yeah, we should have lost but the sim likes us sometimes)
Our win over Chernobyl was huge!
(yeah, we should have lost but the sim likes us sometimes)
Zable
offline
offline
Zurich is almost where I thought... Ill say at least 1 game under where I thought at this point. Ill let y'all figure out which one for sure 
After gameplanning.. well I think we are 2 games under. (and the sim doesnt like us )
After gameplanning.. well I think we are 2 games under. (and the sim doesnt like us )Last edited Mar 13, 2009 15:35:10
I AM KING
offline
offline
Belfast is right where we thought we would be... We are coming off a Championship last season, so we knew we would hit this season with momentum... (and the sim dosnt even come into play with us...) 
Buer
offline
offline
I never expected to have the front office confusions that we did, and honestly think we should be 8-1 right now, rather than 6-3 (I expected to lose to Amsterdam, not that we didn't try). Still fine though, not as caught up in winning as I used to be and as some others are.
I AM KING
offline
offline
Originally posted by Buer
I never expected to have the front office confusions that we did, and honestly think we should be 8-1 right now, rather than 6-3 (I expected to lose to Amsterdam, not that we didn't try). Still fine though, not as caught up in winning as I used to be and as some others are.
Guess we will see what happens when the game plays....
I never expected to have the front office confusions that we did, and honestly think we should be 8-1 right now, rather than 6-3 (I expected to lose to Amsterdam, not that we didn't try). Still fine though, not as caught up in winning as I used to be and as some others are.
Guess we will see what happens when the game plays....
Last edited Mar 14, 2009 06:45:10
Dante929
offline
offline
Originally posted by Buer
Still fine though, not as caught up in winning as I used to be and as some others are.
I call complete BS on that statement.
Still fine though, not as caught up in winning as I used to be and as some others are.
I call complete BS on that statement.
I AM KING
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dante929
Originally posted by Buer
Still fine though, not as caught up in winning as I used to be and as some others are.
I call complete BS on that statement.
yeah i agree i think that if he were actually good he would be caught up in winning, but when your losing its easy to say you dont care...
Originally posted by Buer
Still fine though, not as caught up in winning as I used to be and as some others are.
I call complete BS on that statement.
yeah i agree i think that if he were actually good he would be caught up in winning, but when your losing its easy to say you dont care...
Kid Kutty
offline
offline
I believe my team is getting screwed by the AI a lot this season! We should be 6-3 honestly.
Buer
offline
offline
Originally posted by nate3713
Originally posted by Dante929
Originally posted by Buer
Still fine though, not as caught up in winning as I used to be and as some others are.
I call complete BS on that statement.
yeah i agree i think that if he were actually good he would be caught up in winning, but when your losing its easy to say you dont care...
So do you both agree to shut up if we beat you?
Originally posted by Dante929
Originally posted by Buer
Still fine though, not as caught up in winning as I used to be and as some others are.
I call complete BS on that statement.
yeah i agree i think that if he were actually good he would be caught up in winning, but when your losing its easy to say you dont care...
So do you both agree to shut up if we beat you?
Buer
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dante929
Originally posted by Buer
Still fine though, not as caught up in winning as I used to be and as some others are.
I call complete BS on that statement.
Plus there is absolutely no "BS" there, as the second part of this statement was directed to you and Nate, and your team. I think we can all agree with that.
Originally posted by Buer
Still fine though, not as caught up in winning as I used to be and as some others are.
I call complete BS on that statement.
Plus there is absolutely no "BS" there, as the second part of this statement was directed to you and Nate, and your team. I think we can all agree with that.
Dante929
offline
offline
Originally posted by Buer
Originally posted by nate3713
Originally posted by Dante929
Originally posted by Buer
Still fine though, not as caught up in winning as I used to be and as some others are.
I call complete BS on that statement.
yeah i agree i think that if he were actually good he would be caught up in winning, but when your losing its easy to say you dont care...
So do you both agree to shut up if we beat you?
You guys have a fine team. Besides Amsterdam, Dresden has an outside chance at beating us. Why would you direct the comment at me? I have not belittled any team this season. I simply say BS to not caring about winning. This is why we play. So if you beat us, good job.
Originally posted by nate3713
Originally posted by Dante929
Originally posted by Buer
Still fine though, not as caught up in winning as I used to be and as some others are.
I call complete BS on that statement.
yeah i agree i think that if he were actually good he would be caught up in winning, but when your losing its easy to say you dont care...
So do you both agree to shut up if we beat you?
You guys have a fine team. Besides Amsterdam, Dresden has an outside chance at beating us. Why would you direct the comment at me? I have not belittled any team this season. I simply say BS to not caring about winning. This is why we play. So if you beat us, good job.
Buer
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dante929
Originally posted by Buer
Originally posted by nate3713
Originally posted by Dante929
Originally posted by Buer
Still fine though, not as caught up in winning as I used to be and as some others are.
I call complete BS on that statement.
yeah i agree i think that if he were actually good he would be caught up in winning, but when your losing its easy to say you dont care...
So do you both agree to shut up if we beat you?
You guys have a fine team. Besides Amsterdam, Dresden has an outside chance at beating us. Why would you direct the comment at me? I have not belittled any team this season. I simply say BS to not caring about winning. This is why we play. So if you beat us, good job.
That's where you went wrong. I didn't say that I don't care about winning, I'm just not as caught up in it as I used to be. I remember in our first season in WEBBB11, during the conference championship game against Dublin, I wanted to win so badly I brought in some of the best coordinators around, exploited glitched/cheat plays, and all that stuff just to win, and we still loss. I really didn't care so much about the loss itself as I did about how much time I wasted in gameplanning and recruiting and stuff, especially for a game. So now I'm more laid-back about it, especially compared to some other GMs, such as Nate. Have to admit, I probably seemed like he did, with all the trash-talk on the forums, and still do, but at least I'm not starting fights any more.
So, tbh, it was more Nate than you and Belfast (just lumped them all together), but not saying he's the only one, just probably the best example from these forums. Not visiting our league forums 30+ times a day just to argue in fights helped to make this game a lot more fun. Heck, maybe I'll do something productive, like league rankings, if Cherrie would be kind enough to send me the spreadsheet she uses.
One more thing, why do we have an "outside chance"? We seemto be able to compete fairly well if not better level-wise, so the only other thing that would make a difference is game-planning, and unless you've already scouted us thoroughly, I can't figure how you would know that you'd be able to beat us so surely. Even if you did, you still would need to know which AI we'd use against you, for both defense and offense so...
Originally posted by Buer
Originally posted by nate3713
Originally posted by Dante929
Originally posted by Buer
Still fine though, not as caught up in winning as I used to be and as some others are.
I call complete BS on that statement.
yeah i agree i think that if he were actually good he would be caught up in winning, but when your losing its easy to say you dont care...
So do you both agree to shut up if we beat you?
You guys have a fine team. Besides Amsterdam, Dresden has an outside chance at beating us. Why would you direct the comment at me? I have not belittled any team this season. I simply say BS to not caring about winning. This is why we play. So if you beat us, good job.
That's where you went wrong. I didn't say that I don't care about winning, I'm just not as caught up in it as I used to be. I remember in our first season in WEBBB11, during the conference championship game against Dublin, I wanted to win so badly I brought in some of the best coordinators around, exploited glitched/cheat plays, and all that stuff just to win, and we still loss. I really didn't care so much about the loss itself as I did about how much time I wasted in gameplanning and recruiting and stuff, especially for a game. So now I'm more laid-back about it, especially compared to some other GMs, such as Nate. Have to admit, I probably seemed like he did, with all the trash-talk on the forums, and still do, but at least I'm not starting fights any more.
So, tbh, it was more Nate than you and Belfast (just lumped them all together), but not saying he's the only one, just probably the best example from these forums. Not visiting our league forums 30+ times a day just to argue in fights helped to make this game a lot more fun. Heck, maybe I'll do something productive, like league rankings, if Cherrie would be kind enough to send me the spreadsheet she uses.
One more thing, why do we have an "outside chance"? We seemto be able to compete fairly well if not better level-wise, so the only other thing that would make a difference is game-planning, and unless you've already scouted us thoroughly, I can't figure how you would know that you'd be able to beat us so surely. Even if you did, you still would need to know which AI we'd use against you, for both defense and offense so...
Dante929
offline
offline
Originally posted by Buer
Originally posted by Dante929
Originally posted by Buer
Originally posted by nate3713
Originally posted by Dante929
Originally posted by Buer
Still fine though, not as caught up in winning as I used to be and as some others are.
I call complete BS on that statement.
yeah i agree i think that if he were actually good he would be caught up in winning, but when your losing its easy to say you dont care...
So do you both agree to shut up if we beat you?
You guys have a fine team. Besides Amsterdam, Dresden has an outside chance at beating us. Why would you direct the comment at me? I have not belittled any team this season. I simply say BS to not caring about winning. This is why we play. So if you beat us, good job.
That's where you went wrong. I didn't say that I don't care about winning, I'm just not as caught up in it as I used to be. I remember in our first season in WEBBB11, during the conference championship game against Dublin, I wanted to win so badly I brought in some of the best coordinators around, exploited glitched/cheat plays, and all that stuff just to win, and we still loss. I really didn't care so much about the loss itself as I did about how much time I wasted in gameplanning and recruiting and stuff, especially for a game. So now I'm more laid-back about it, especially compared to some other GMs, such as Nate. Have to admit, I probably seemed like he did, with all the trash-talk on the forums, and still do, but at least I'm not starting fights any more.
So, tbh, it was more Nate than you and Belfast (just lumped them all together), but not saying he's the only one, just probably the best example from these forums. Not visiting our league forums 30+ times a day just to argue in fights helped to make this game a lot more fun. Heck, maybe I'll do something productive, like league rankings, if Cherrie would be kind enough to send me the spreadsheet she uses.
One more thing, why do we have an "outside chance"? We seemto be able to compete fairly well if not better level-wise, so the only other thing that would make a difference is game-planning, and unless you've already scouted us thoroughly, I can't figure how you would know that you'd be able to beat us so surely. Even if you did, you still would need to know which AI we'd use against you, for both defense and offense so...
I say outside chance because I am comparing common opponents. If we beat someone 65-3, there is no gameplan that team can use to turn it around. For example, we crushed Dublin! You beat them by 10. I figured we had you beat by 40 at that point. After the Amsterdam game, I am not that confident. You and your GM's did as best as you could against that lineup. Amsterdam is superior to everyone in this league at the moment. I have Belfast as a 14 point UD to the 49ers. Our organization as a whole has figured out some of the bugs for this season. There is a definite problem with the AI. Belfast has beaten two of our other squads in scrimmages. Teams that are rated higher.
I am not here to pick a fight with you. I leave that to my owner. He seems to do a pretty good job at pissing off everyone he encounters. However, he is apart of the EU, which has some of the best GM's in all of GLB! You have a great team and I look forward to the game!
Originally posted by Dante929
Originally posted by Buer
Originally posted by nate3713
Originally posted by Dante929
Originally posted by Buer
Still fine though, not as caught up in winning as I used to be and as some others are.
I call complete BS on that statement.
yeah i agree i think that if he were actually good he would be caught up in winning, but when your losing its easy to say you dont care...
So do you both agree to shut up if we beat you?
You guys have a fine team. Besides Amsterdam, Dresden has an outside chance at beating us. Why would you direct the comment at me? I have not belittled any team this season. I simply say BS to not caring about winning. This is why we play. So if you beat us, good job.
That's where you went wrong. I didn't say that I don't care about winning, I'm just not as caught up in it as I used to be. I remember in our first season in WEBBB11, during the conference championship game against Dublin, I wanted to win so badly I brought in some of the best coordinators around, exploited glitched/cheat plays, and all that stuff just to win, and we still loss. I really didn't care so much about the loss itself as I did about how much time I wasted in gameplanning and recruiting and stuff, especially for a game. So now I'm more laid-back about it, especially compared to some other GMs, such as Nate. Have to admit, I probably seemed like he did, with all the trash-talk on the forums, and still do, but at least I'm not starting fights any more.
So, tbh, it was more Nate than you and Belfast (just lumped them all together), but not saying he's the only one, just probably the best example from these forums. Not visiting our league forums 30+ times a day just to argue in fights helped to make this game a lot more fun. Heck, maybe I'll do something productive, like league rankings, if Cherrie would be kind enough to send me the spreadsheet she uses.
One more thing, why do we have an "outside chance"? We seemto be able to compete fairly well if not better level-wise, so the only other thing that would make a difference is game-planning, and unless you've already scouted us thoroughly, I can't figure how you would know that you'd be able to beat us so surely. Even if you did, you still would need to know which AI we'd use against you, for both defense and offense so...
I say outside chance because I am comparing common opponents. If we beat someone 65-3, there is no gameplan that team can use to turn it around. For example, we crushed Dublin! You beat them by 10. I figured we had you beat by 40 at that point. After the Amsterdam game, I am not that confident. You and your GM's did as best as you could against that lineup. Amsterdam is superior to everyone in this league at the moment. I have Belfast as a 14 point UD to the 49ers. Our organization as a whole has figured out some of the bugs for this season. There is a definite problem with the AI. Belfast has beaten two of our other squads in scrimmages. Teams that are rated higher.
I am not here to pick a fight with you. I leave that to my owner. He seems to do a pretty good job at pissing off everyone he encounters. However, he is apart of the EU, which has some of the best GM's in all of GLB! You have a great team and I look forward to the game!
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
