Warrior General Games

Naga:
1) Surabaya Poison Dart Frogs (2)
2) Sumatra Sting (1)
3) Phnom Penh Samurai (3)
4) Hell Valley Snow Monkeys (5)
5) Tibet Psychonauts (4)
6) Seoul Snatchers (6)
7) Burma Black Dragons (7)
8) Manila Pack (8)
9) Shanghai Tigers (9)
10) Seoul Men (10)
11) Manila Death Squad (11)
12) New Jersey Beaver Hunters (12)
13) Malaysia Madness (13)
14) Bacolod Cobras (14)
15) Ho Chi Minh Hookers (15)
16) Brutal Deluxe (16)

Garuda:
1) Komodo Dragon (1)
2) Lea Lea Furniture (3)
3) Palembang Tigers (2)
4) Georgetown United (5)
5) Arctic Avalanche (4)
6) The Manila Guerrillas (6)
7) Tibetan Drunk Monks (7)
8) Michiana Grizzlies (8)
9) Taipei Yonghe Soybean Milk (9)
10) Garut Fire Horses (10)
11) Makati Red Robins (12)
12) Beijing Drifters (11)
13) Kailua Tigers (13)
14) Midway Maulers (14)
15) Laos Chaos (15)
16) Shanghai Shadow Dragons

Predictions:
Last Week: 13-3
Overall: 90-22

This week:
Shanghai Tigers over Seoul Men (4)
Hell Valley Snow Monkeys over Manila Death Squad
Tibet Psychonauts over Burma Black Dragons
Phnom Penh Samurai over Malaysia Marauders
Surabaya Poison Dart Frogs over Seoul Snatchers
Sumatra Sting over Brutal Deluxe
New Jersey Beaver Hunters over Ho Chi Minh Hookers
Manila Pack over Bacolod Cobras
Palembang Tigers over The Manila Guerrillas
Beijing Drifters over Laos Chaos
Garut Fire Horses over Midway Maulers
Tibetan Drunk Monks over Shanghai Shadow Dragons
Georgetown United over Kailua Tigers
Arctic Avalanche over Makati Red Robins
Taipei Yonghe Soybean Milk over Michiana Grizzlies (5)
Komodo Dragon over Lea Lea Furniture

these are still a joke...haha

I do appreciate the effort in doing them though

How can you say they are a joke until you've played the teams that are ranked above you? If you beat them, the rankings will change. If you lose, the rankings are justified. There are 3 undefeated teams in your conference, so in my opinion all 3 are tied at #1 and the rankings continue at #4.

We just annihilated a team that brought in an entirely new roster of lvl 45+ to low 50 players 4 days ago...they were supposed to be better than we were, but...alas...they were completely outmatched. That's why I can say these rankings are a joke. Continually decimating opponents who're evenly matched or now seemingly 'better' and we're still just hangin around...

I did say I appreciated the effort he puts into these, because it's gotta be some kind of number crunching system...

If the team you just beat had as much turnover as you say they did, then their team chemistry must have taken a hit. That severely affects their on-field performance, so it shouldn't come as a surprise that you won if your chemistry is perfect or near-perfect.

It's pretty much impossible to compare teams if they haven't played. You'll have your chance to earn that #1 ranking you covet.

Originally posted by Himewad
If the team you just beat had as much turnover as you say they did, then their team chemistry must have taken a hit. That severely affects their on-field performance, so it shouldn't come as a surprise that you won if your chemistry is perfect or near-perfect.

It's pretty much impossible to compare teams if they haven't played. You'll have your chance to earn that #1 ranking you covet.


your right and we will bring our A game hopefuly we can pull it out but those boys look pretty tuff, but then agin we ain't to shabby either.

Originally posted by G.O.D Turner
We just annihilated a team that brought in an entirely new roster of lvl 45+ to low 50 players 4 days ago...they were supposed to be better than we were, but...alas...they were completely outmatched. That's why I can say these rankings are a joke. Continually decimating opponents who're evenly matched or now seemingly 'better' and we're still just hangin around...

I did say I appreciated the effort he puts into these, because it's gotta be some kind of number crunching system...

Wait, I'm confused... so, my program had you listed as BEATING the Pack... and you're complaining that because you were predicted to beat a lower ranked team, you didn't move up? Isn't that like saying that if OU beats Washington State, they should move up?

Originally posted by Nanahara715
Originally posted by G.O.D Turner

We just annihilated a team that brought in an entirely new roster of lvl 45+ to low 50 players 4 days ago...they were supposed to be better than we were, but...alas...they were completely outmatched. That's why I can say these rankings are a joke. Continually decimating opponents who're evenly matched or now seemingly 'better' and we're still just hangin around...

I did say I appreciated the effort he puts into these, because it's gotta be some kind of number crunching system...

Wait, I'm confused... so, my program had you listed as BEATING the Pack... and you're complaining that because you were predicted to beat a lower ranked team, you didn't move up? Isn't that like saying that if OU beats Washington State, they should move up?

I'm not bitching, but the pack would have been a better team if they started the season with the players they currently have...which would make them better on your list I think

I really don't care tho. I like looking at the rankings after each game. The last 3 games of the season will truly determine who the best teams are...well, and the playoffs

The pack is a strong team. They recruited heavily during the offseason, and if you say they picked up a whole new offense and defense within the last few days is true, then they still look strong. But their chemistry is extremely low, and they are currently a sub .500 team. So quit your bitching, you beat some one you should have beaten. Congrats!

Ummm, why did AD MVP respond to comments being made to G.O.D Turner?

Originally posted by Himewad
Ummm, why did AD MVP respond to comments being made to G.O.D Turner?

because he is AD

Because we're a quadruple multi, please report us

Originally posted by Himewad
Ummm, why did AD MVP respond to comments being made to G.O.D Turner?

because he didn't....de de dee

I don't report people. It's pointless, IMO. Nothing to gain. Just saying it looks a little odd.

I responded to Nanahara's comment...not turner's