First Post, Woot!
helmetcreator
offline
offline
I don't think there are too many human controlled teams that are trying! I personally know that we play 6 teams that are either CPU owned or CPU players mostly, and that only looking at the 1 conference.
Seric
offline
offline
I know for my team, Winning is good but getting a quality build started is more important.
Originally posted by Seric
I know for my team, Winning is good but getting a quality build started is more important.
Seriously, who beats their chest about winning a Pee Wee League? If you win cool, if you don't cool. I have no intentions of winning. I am not boosting any of my players. As a matter fact, if you guys remember back to when Bort floated this idea out for a vote, he said Pee Wee teams wouldn't be allowed to boost until the season was over. To be honest, I didn't know that rule had changed, and probably would have saved myself the 10,000 Flex Points it took to build these players had I known I had no chance at winning. I don't care if I don't win, but I'd at least like to have a chance.
I know for my team, Winning is good but getting a quality build started is more important.
Seriously, who beats their chest about winning a Pee Wee League? If you win cool, if you don't cool. I have no intentions of winning. I am not boosting any of my players. As a matter fact, if you guys remember back to when Bort floated this idea out for a vote, he said Pee Wee teams wouldn't be allowed to boost until the season was over. To be honest, I didn't know that rule had changed, and probably would have saved myself the 10,000 Flex Points it took to build these players had I known I had no chance at winning. I don't care if I don't win, but I'd at least like to have a chance.
bills_red
offline
offline
I made my guys to try and win, they won't boost and will be retired at end of year.
eb45
offline
offline
I started my team with some friends from another site. We're hoping to win, but also to acquaint several of our members to GLB, as this will probably be their first team.
shellfishdiver
offline
offline
i actually just wanted another place for friends to play in a more relaxed setting. we are not boosters and just having fun. i figure to retire any players that dont look good at the end of the year.(i'm experimenting with different builds on players) then next season i can make more guys.
Heremraver
offline
offline
Originally posted by DavyJonesLocker
Originally posted by Seric
I know for my team, Winning is good but getting a quality build started is more important.
Seriously, who beats their chest about winning a Pee Wee League? If you win cool, if you don't cool. I have no intentions of winning. I am not boosting any of my players. As a matter fact, if you guys remember back to when Bort floated this idea out for a vote, he said Pee Wee teams wouldn't be allowed to boost until the season was over. To be honest, I didn't know that rule had changed, and probably would have saved myself the 10,000 Flex Points it took to build these players had I known I had no chance at winning. I don't care if I don't win, but I'd at least like to have a chance.
Tactics are = to or > boosting in pee wees.There was a team last season with all boosted players that took 6th place in our league and lost in the first round of the playoffs.We beat them 51-21 i think and we have like 2 boosted players.
Originally posted by Seric
I know for my team, Winning is good but getting a quality build started is more important.
Seriously, who beats their chest about winning a Pee Wee League? If you win cool, if you don't cool. I have no intentions of winning. I am not boosting any of my players. As a matter fact, if you guys remember back to when Bort floated this idea out for a vote, he said Pee Wee teams wouldn't be allowed to boost until the season was over. To be honest, I didn't know that rule had changed, and probably would have saved myself the 10,000 Flex Points it took to build these players had I known I had no chance at winning. I don't care if I don't win, but I'd at least like to have a chance.
Tactics are = to or > boosting in pee wees.There was a team last season with all boosted players that took 6th place in our league and lost in the first round of the playoffs.We beat them 51-21 i think and we have like 2 boosted players.
Seric
offline
offline
Originally posted by DavyJonesLocker
Originally posted by Seric
I know for my team, Winning is good but getting a quality build started is more important.
Seriously, who beats their chest about winning a Pee Wee League? If you win cool, if you don't cool. I have no intentions of winning. I am not boosting any of my players. As a matter fact, if you guys remember back to when Bort floated this idea out for a vote, he said Pee Wee teams wouldn't be allowed to boost until the season was over. To be honest, I didn't know that rule had changed, and probably would have saved myself the 10,000 Flex Points it took to build these players had I known I had no chance at winning. I don't care if I don't win, but I'd at least like to have a chance.
Did you bother to read my post or did you just read until I said winning is good and then stop? Because to FURTHER ELABORATE, I stated that getting a quality build started is MORE important. Before you go into a huge rant about people beating their chest over winning, try reading the entire statement first. I have not set ANY tactics for ANY of the games I played. I don't care if I win or lose. The purpose is to get quality builds started for the next level. I am not actually making any kind of effort to win anything in this league.
Originally posted by Seric
I know for my team, Winning is good but getting a quality build started is more important.
Seriously, who beats their chest about winning a Pee Wee League? If you win cool, if you don't cool. I have no intentions of winning. I am not boosting any of my players. As a matter fact, if you guys remember back to when Bort floated this idea out for a vote, he said Pee Wee teams wouldn't be allowed to boost until the season was over. To be honest, I didn't know that rule had changed, and probably would have saved myself the 10,000 Flex Points it took to build these players had I known I had no chance at winning. I don't care if I don't win, but I'd at least like to have a chance.
Did you bother to read my post or did you just read until I said winning is good and then stop? Because to FURTHER ELABORATE, I stated that getting a quality build started is MORE important. Before you go into a huge rant about people beating their chest over winning, try reading the entire statement first. I have not set ANY tactics for ANY of the games I played. I don't care if I win or lose. The purpose is to get quality builds started for the next level. I am not actually making any kind of effort to win anything in this league.
Originally posted by Seric
Originally posted by DavyJonesLocker
Originally posted by Seric
I know for my team, Winning is good but getting a quality build started is more important.
Seriously, who beats their chest about winning a Pee Wee League? If you win cool, if you don't cool. I have no intentions of winning. I am not boosting any of my players. As a matter fact, if you guys remember back to when Bort floated this idea out for a vote, he said Pee Wee teams wouldn't be allowed to boost until the season was over. To be honest, I didn't know that rule had changed, and probably would have saved myself the 10,000 Flex Points it took to build these players had I known I had no chance at winning. I don't care if I don't win, but I'd at least like to have a chance.
Did you bother to read my post or did you just read until I said winning is good and then stop? Because to FURTHER ELABORATE, I stated that getting a quality build started is MORE important. Before you go into a huge rant about people beating their chest over winning, try reading the entire statement first. I have not set ANY tactics for ANY of the games I played. I don't care if I win or lose. The purpose is to get quality builds started for the next level. I am not actually making any kind of effort to win anything in this league.
I was agreeing with you. Just because someone quotes your post doesn't automatically mean they are taking a counter argument against you. I quoted your post, then give my opinion on the matter. Not too hard to figure out.
Originally posted by DavyJonesLocker
Originally posted by Seric
I know for my team, Winning is good but getting a quality build started is more important.
Seriously, who beats their chest about winning a Pee Wee League? If you win cool, if you don't cool. I have no intentions of winning. I am not boosting any of my players. As a matter fact, if you guys remember back to when Bort floated this idea out for a vote, he said Pee Wee teams wouldn't be allowed to boost until the season was over. To be honest, I didn't know that rule had changed, and probably would have saved myself the 10,000 Flex Points it took to build these players had I known I had no chance at winning. I don't care if I don't win, but I'd at least like to have a chance.
Did you bother to read my post or did you just read until I said winning is good and then stop? Because to FURTHER ELABORATE, I stated that getting a quality build started is MORE important. Before you go into a huge rant about people beating their chest over winning, try reading the entire statement first. I have not set ANY tactics for ANY of the games I played. I don't care if I win or lose. The purpose is to get quality builds started for the next level. I am not actually making any kind of effort to win anything in this league.
I was agreeing with you. Just because someone quotes your post doesn't automatically mean they are taking a counter argument against you. I quoted your post, then give my opinion on the matter. Not too hard to figure out.
Last edited Mar 2, 2009 10:44:55
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.