Good Job Warriors! Naga doesnt get the title this season!
robelder
offline
offline
Yep. I wish it were us, but our league was very good all year. No matter what smack talking was going on in Naga.
To all those who hated on our conference, each year is a brand new year. You can't compare and say one is better for sure than the other.
To all those who hated on our conference, each year is a brand new year. You can't compare and say one is better for sure than the other.
EmpYllek
offline
offline
Originally posted by Club America
stucknut would have won it if it wouldnt have imploded and shit.
+ 6.02 x 10^23
(ill give cudos to whichever HOF member recognises that number first - nonHOFers dont deserve my respect).
stucknut would have won it if it wouldnt have imploded and shit.
+ 6.02 x 10^23
(ill give cudos to whichever HOF member recognises that number first - nonHOFers dont deserve my respect).
kluisi
offline
offline
Originally posted by EmpYllek
Originally posted by Club America
stucknut would have won it if it wouldnt have imploded and shit.
+ 6.02 x 10^23
(ill give cudos to whichever HOF member recognises that number first - nonHOFers dont deserve my respect).
It's a mole from chemistry. And I don't need the respect, but thanks anyway.
Well the number itself is the Avogadro constant and it is used to calculate the number of moles of a substance using the substance's atomic mass.
Originally posted by Club America
stucknut would have won it if it wouldnt have imploded and shit.
+ 6.02 x 10^23
(ill give cudos to whichever HOF member recognises that number first - nonHOFers dont deserve my respect).
It's a mole from chemistry. And I don't need the respect, but thanks anyway.
Well the number itself is the Avogadro constant and it is used to calculate the number of moles of a substance using the substance's atomic mass.
Last edited Feb 9, 2009 08:39:38
moose352005
offline
offline
Originally posted by EmpYllek
Originally posted by Club America
stucknut would have won it if it wouldnt have imploded and shit.
+ 6.02 x 10^23
(ill give cudos to whichever HOF member recognises that number first - nonHOFers dont deserve my respect).
avogadro's # and shit.
oops. Someone beat me to it.
Originally posted by Club America
stucknut would have won it if it wouldnt have imploded and shit.
+ 6.02 x 10^23
(ill give cudos to whichever HOF member recognises that number first - nonHOFers dont deserve my respect).
avogadro's # and shit.
oops. Someone beat me to it.
Last edited Feb 9, 2009 10:16:20
ScullyDawg
offline
offline
Congrats Warriors.....you guys figured out our D and laid the smackdown. And after that first play from scrimmage I thought hell we're gonna run all over them. You guys did an excellent job and props to your agents and gameplanners. Good luck in AAA next year on the other side of the league.
Club America
offline
offline
Originally posted by EmpYllek
Originally posted by Club America
stucknut would have won it if it wouldnt have imploded and shit.
+ 6.02 x 10^23
(ill give cudos to whichever HOF member recognises that number first - nonHOFers dont deserve my respect).
thats the avocado constant for a Mol.
Originally posted by Club America
stucknut would have won it if it wouldnt have imploded and shit.
+ 6.02 x 10^23
(ill give cudos to whichever HOF member recognises that number first - nonHOFers dont deserve my respect).
thats the avocado constant for a Mol.
DubsOnD
offline
offline
Originally posted by kluisi
Originally posted by EmpYllek
Originally posted by Club America
stucknut would have won it if it wouldnt have imploded and shit.
+ 6.02 x 10^23
(ill give cudos to whichever HOF member recognises that number first - nonHOFers dont deserve my respect).
It's a mole from chemistry. And I don't need the respect, but thanks anyway.
Well the number itself is the Avogadro constant and it is used to calculate the number of moles of a substance using the substance's atomic mass.
I'm impressed that a monkey with a gun was the first to figure it out! Of course, he probably uses 6.0221415 × 10^23 since he looks like the type who likes be as accurate as possible.
Originally posted by EmpYllek
Originally posted by Club America
stucknut would have won it if it wouldnt have imploded and shit.
+ 6.02 x 10^23
(ill give cudos to whichever HOF member recognises that number first - nonHOFers dont deserve my respect).
It's a mole from chemistry. And I don't need the respect, but thanks anyway.
Well the number itself is the Avogadro constant and it is used to calculate the number of moles of a substance using the substance's atomic mass.
I'm impressed that a monkey with a gun was the first to figure it out! Of course, he probably uses 6.0221415 × 10^23 since he looks like the type who likes be as accurate as possible.
EmpYllek
offline
offline
Originally posted by kluisi
It's a mole from chemistry. And I don't need the respect, but thanks anyway.
Well the number itself is the Avogadro constant and it is used to calculate the number of moles of a substance using the substance's atomic mass.
Because Im a chemist Im going to nitpick this. Avogadros constant isnt really used to relate atomic mass and moles. Since Na is a measure of the molecular entities in a mole its much less useful for calculating how many moles of something there are than say just weighing it and dividing its mass by GFM. To relate Na with the number of moles of something you technically have to know exactly how many atoms/ions/molecules etc of the substance before you can achieve this conversion (Im ignoring doing complicated maths that would take you longer than the process of dumping the shit on a balance).
Of course if you want to look at stuff like crystal dynamics or are performing physical chemical calculations (Boltzman and Faraday and Vant'hoff) it can be incredibly useful.
It's a mole from chemistry. And I don't need the respect, but thanks anyway.
Well the number itself is the Avogadro constant and it is used to calculate the number of moles of a substance using the substance's atomic mass.
Because Im a chemist Im going to nitpick this. Avogadros constant isnt really used to relate atomic mass and moles. Since Na is a measure of the molecular entities in a mole its much less useful for calculating how many moles of something there are than say just weighing it and dividing its mass by GFM. To relate Na with the number of moles of something you technically have to know exactly how many atoms/ions/molecules etc of the substance before you can achieve this conversion (Im ignoring doing complicated maths that would take you longer than the process of dumping the shit on a balance).
Of course if you want to look at stuff like crystal dynamics or are performing physical chemical calculations (Boltzman and Faraday and Vant'hoff) it can be incredibly useful.
Last edited Feb 9, 2009 13:38:43
delaneylewis
offline
offline
thanks all. good luck to all of you guys. most of you guys are classy individuals.
delaneylewis
offline
offline
Originally posted by ScullyDawg
Congrats Warriors.....you guys figured out our D and laid the smackdown. And after that first play from scrimmage I thought hell we're gonna run all over them. You guys did an excellent job and props to your agents and gameplanners. Good luck in AAA next year on the other side of the league.
you have an awesome team! we'll see you next year in AAA.
Congrats Warriors.....you guys figured out our D and laid the smackdown. And after that first play from scrimmage I thought hell we're gonna run all over them. You guys did an excellent job and props to your agents and gameplanners. Good luck in AAA next year on the other side of the league.
you have an awesome team! we'll see you next year in AAA.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
