Any ideas how we can work one out?
tedwilli
offline
offline
Saw this in another league I GM for, figured we should do it too. It's been working Tomhusker take it and start it for the Lions. Just an Idea, someone will need to tally votes any takers?
RULES
1. Only owners and GM's of teams can vote, announce what team you represent(maximum of 5 sets of votes from each team so a team with huge # of GM's doesn't dramatically swing the vote)
2. Only vote for your own conference (so you have an accurate idea of the players you're voting for). This is why there are 2 separate threads..1 for each conference.
3. You can vote for a MAXIMUM of 5 players from your own team.
SUGGESTIONS
4. Don't just post votes like "the whole Plumbers team or Wolverines team" or "the whole Lightning or Gryphons secondary" If you're gonna vote, please actually put some thought and (gasp) time/research into it.
5. Use stats in your voting sure, but don't base everything completely off this. Look for hugely inflated stats in games, etc. and use things such as: team success, valuability to team. (Example- with LOT's especially, how many sacks did they allow? For all OL look at how many sacks and how many rushing yards the team had not necessarily only pancakes). In essence, vote fairly and put time into it, don't vote blindly otherwise it loses its purpose.
6. Try and fill out the entire ballot, I don't want 40 votes for QB and 3 for punter. Not required but it'd be nice to have the same amount of votes for every position. Have some fun doing this.
BALLOT:copy-paste this and make your votes below. Also post what team you GM/own (so I can count the "own team votes" (MAX of 4)and post both the player name and what team he is on. Thanks guys, if you just do this it'll make it easier for me to tally the votes and run a fair Pro Bowl vote.
QB:
RB:
RB:
FB:
WR:
WR:
WR:
TE:
OT:
OT:
C:
OG:
OG:
DE:
DE:
DT:
DT:
OLB:
MLB:
OLB:
CB:
CB:
CB:
FS:
SS:
K:
P:
KR:
PR:
One more thing...I want to vote for league MVP. Please vote for the top 5 choices (in order). First place votes get 10 points, second gets 7, third gets 5, forth gets 3 and fifth gets 1.
MVP:
Runner-up:
3rd:
4th:
5th:
RULES
1. Only owners and GM's of teams can vote, announce what team you represent(maximum of 5 sets of votes from each team so a team with huge # of GM's doesn't dramatically swing the vote)
2. Only vote for your own conference (so you have an accurate idea of the players you're voting for). This is why there are 2 separate threads..1 for each conference.
3. You can vote for a MAXIMUM of 5 players from your own team.
SUGGESTIONS
4. Don't just post votes like "the whole Plumbers team or Wolverines team" or "the whole Lightning or Gryphons secondary" If you're gonna vote, please actually put some thought and (gasp) time/research into it.
5. Use stats in your voting sure, but don't base everything completely off this. Look for hugely inflated stats in games, etc. and use things such as: team success, valuability to team. (Example- with LOT's especially, how many sacks did they allow? For all OL look at how many sacks and how many rushing yards the team had not necessarily only pancakes). In essence, vote fairly and put time into it, don't vote blindly otherwise it loses its purpose.
6. Try and fill out the entire ballot, I don't want 40 votes for QB and 3 for punter. Not required but it'd be nice to have the same amount of votes for every position. Have some fun doing this.
BALLOT:copy-paste this and make your votes below. Also post what team you GM/own (so I can count the "own team votes" (MAX of 4)and post both the player name and what team he is on. Thanks guys, if you just do this it'll make it easier for me to tally the votes and run a fair Pro Bowl vote.
QB:
RB:
RB:
FB:
WR:
WR:
WR:
TE:
OT:
OT:
C:
OG:
OG:
DE:
DE:
DT:
DT:
OLB:
MLB:
OLB:
CB:
CB:
CB:
FS:
SS:
K:
P:
KR:
PR:
One more thing...I want to vote for league MVP. Please vote for the top 5 choices (in order). First place votes get 10 points, second gets 7, third gets 5, forth gets 3 and fifth gets 1.
MVP:
Runner-up:
3rd:
4th:
5th:
Last edited Jan 28, 2009 11:35:03
wahawk04
offline
offline
You should eliminate the HB position from the voting. It should be no question who the best HB in the Conference is.
boomerjetfan
offline
offline
Originally posted by wahawk04
You should eliminate the HB position from the voting. It should be no question who the best HB in the Conference is.
13 carries 55.0 yards 4.2 avg. 0 TDs
2 receptions 19.5 yards 9.8 avg 0 Tds
You mean this guy? Simply stunning stats right there
You should eliminate the HB position from the voting. It should be no question who the best HB in the Conference is.
13 carries 55.0 yards 4.2 avg. 0 TDs
2 receptions 19.5 yards 9.8 avg 0 Tds
You mean this guy? Simply stunning stats right there
Last edited Jan 28, 2009 16:07:34
wahawk04
offline
offline
Originally posted by boomerjetfan
Originally posted by wahawk04
You should eliminate the HB position from the voting. It should be no question who the best HB in the Conference is.
13 carries 55.0 yards 4.2 avg. 0 TDs
2 receptions 19.5 yards 9.8 avg 0 Tds
You mean this guy? Simply stunning stats right there
Who is that?
Originally posted by wahawk04
You should eliminate the HB position from the voting. It should be no question who the best HB in the Conference is.
13 carries 55.0 yards 4.2 avg. 0 TDs
2 receptions 19.5 yards 9.8 avg 0 Tds
You mean this guy? Simply stunning stats right there
Who is that?
wahawk04
offline
offline
So these numbers are better?
28 carries 77.0yards 2.8avg 1TD
0 catches 0.0yards 0
It's funny that I don't even have to bring Robert up and yet you still think of him as the best in the Conference. Good for you.
28 carries 77.0yards 2.8avg 1TD
0 catches 0.0yards 0
It's funny that I don't even have to bring Robert up and yet you still think of him as the best in the Conference. Good for you.
mactruck27
offline
offline
Originally posted by wahawk04
So these numbers are better?
28 carries 77.0yards 2.8avg 1TD
0 catches 0.0yards 0
It's funny that I don't even have to bring Robert up and yet you still think of him as the best in the Conference. Good for you.
But you did bring him up.
Idiot.
So these numbers are better?
28 carries 77.0yards 2.8avg 1TD
0 catches 0.0yards 0
It's funny that I don't even have to bring Robert up and yet you still think of him as the best in the Conference. Good for you.
But you did bring him up.
Idiot.
wahawk04
offline
offline
Originally posted by mactruck27
Originally posted by wahawk04
So these numbers are better?
28 carries 77.0yards 2.8avg 1TD
0 catches 0.0yards 0
It's funny that I don't even have to bring Robert up and yet you still think of him as the best in the Conference. Good for you.
But you did bring him up.
Idiot.
When did I bring him up?
Originally posted by wahawk04
So these numbers are better?
28 carries 77.0yards 2.8avg 1TD
0 catches 0.0yards 0
It's funny that I don't even have to bring Robert up and yet you still think of him as the best in the Conference. Good for you.
But you did bring him up.
Idiot.
When did I bring him up?
mactruck27
offline
offline
In your first post on here.
1) If you are like 90% of GLB users, you meant your own player.
2) If you are in the other 10%, then I apologize.
1) If you are like 90% of GLB users, you meant your own player.
2) If you are in the other 10%, then I apologize.
wahawk04
offline
offline
Originally posted by mactruck27
In your first post on here.
1) If you are like 90% of GLB users, you meant your own player.
2) If you are in the other 10%, then I apologize.
apology accepted
In your first post on here.
1) If you are like 90% of GLB users, you meant your own player.
2) If you are in the other 10%, then I apologize.
apology accepted
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
