That's about as close as they get. Well played, sirs.
OSUmike03
offline
offline
I'm just gonna put it out there that they wanted to run against us?
Guh. I'm pissed.
Guh. I'm pissed.
OSUmike03
offline
offline
And also....fuck "good game". Grow some fucking balls and play right. I'm sure we could win a lot of games running the same 2 plays every time. That's just fucking cheap.
Play the game right, or don't play at all. This is a SIM. There was nothing sim about that win.
Play the game right, or don't play at all. This is a SIM. There was nothing sim about that win.
gatorfan
offline
offline
Originally posted by OSUmike03
And also....fuck "good game". Grow some fucking balls and play right. I'm sure we could win a lot of games running the same 2 plays every time. That's just fucking cheap.
Play the game right, or don't play at all. This is a SIM. There was nothing sim about that win.
What?!? Are we bitter?!? I don't know what is more shocking - successfully executing the same run plays or unsuccessfully stopping the same run plays!
A loss is a loss. Suck it up, learn from it, and game plan better next time. As a former DC I can say that I only wish someone would have tried running the same two plays against us.
And also....fuck "good game". Grow some fucking balls and play right. I'm sure we could win a lot of games running the same 2 plays every time. That's just fucking cheap.
Play the game right, or don't play at all. This is a SIM. There was nothing sim about that win.
What?!? Are we bitter?!? I don't know what is more shocking - successfully executing the same run plays or unsuccessfully stopping the same run plays!
A loss is a loss. Suck it up, learn from it, and game plan better next time. As a former DC I can say that I only wish someone would have tried running the same two plays against us.
Last edited Jan 24, 2009 08:01:34
aricpelt
offline
offline
The God's of War like that result!... Obviously, Vilnius saw a weakness they thought they could exploit, and they did it successfully!... That's not cheap!... that's great game planning!
We thought you had a weakness, we attacked it. We have more plays in the AI, but they were not firing because you couldn't effectively stop our 2 plays To be honest though, we had 15 or so plays in the AI ... we went heavy on one play because it looked like your defense couldn't consistently stop it. You beat Warsaw and other top teams so you are a force to be reckoned with and worthy of putting together a gameplan that tries to exploit any weakness possible.
GG Portland ... you have a heck of a game in front of you with Stalingrad Ironmen
GG Portland ... you have a heck of a game in front of you with Stalingrad Ironmen
OSUmike03
offline
offline
Oh I learned from it alright. I learned that you guys are cheap motherfuckers who don't like to play the game the way it's supposed to be played.
It's just like the retarded 12 year olds who will play Madden, pick the Patriots, and just throw to Moss every single play.
Does it work? Sometimes it does, and sometimes it doesn't. But it's what makes the game unplayable. It's boring, it's juvenile, and it's pointless.
Next time, I'll make sure to play a team run by 2 year olds. Them just pressing buttons is probably just as smart as what you guys did. So congrats.
It's just like the retarded 12 year olds who will play Madden, pick the Patriots, and just throw to Moss every single play.
Does it work? Sometimes it does, and sometimes it doesn't. But it's what makes the game unplayable. It's boring, it's juvenile, and it's pointless.
Next time, I'll make sure to play a team run by 2 year olds. Them just pressing buttons is probably just as smart as what you guys did. So congrats.
Since you are so driven by the 2 plays, I recommend you shore up your defense to take away the following 2 plays:
Strong I, inside run, Right
and to a lesser degree
I, inside run, Right
if I remember correctly, Stalingrad has a dominant run offense
Strong I, inside run, Right
and to a lesser degree
I, inside run, Right
if I remember correctly, Stalingrad has a dominant run offense
OSUmike03
offline
offline
I found weakness in the Raptors (actually another player did) and I exploited it several times throughout the game. But jesus christ at least I play fair and sim and don't run those plays every fucking time.
I'm sure we could have won had we done that. But if winning means that much to y'all, fine. So be it. But I'm not going to play like a "cheeser".
Congrats on the win. You definitely didn't deserve it. At least when the Butchers beat us, they played us sim.
I'm sure we could have won had we done that. But if winning means that much to y'all, fine. So be it. But I'm not going to play like a "cheeser".
Congrats on the win. You definitely didn't deserve it. At least when the Butchers beat us, they played us sim.
griffin8r
offline
offline
Originally posted by Steel_Destroyer
Since you are so driven by the 2 plays, I recommend you shore up your defense to take away the following 2 plays:
Strong I, inside run, Right
and to a lesser degree
I, inside run, Right
if I remember correctly, Stalingrad has a dominant run offense
Epic fail.
You don't even know the actual name of the play you ran against us.
It's called the Halfback slam, same play out of both formations. It's the most broken play in this game, tbh.
I could take any team in this league and run that play exclusively out of 2-3 formations and win every game.
It's called cheese, dude.
Since you are so driven by the 2 plays, I recommend you shore up your defense to take away the following 2 plays:
Strong I, inside run, Right
and to a lesser degree
I, inside run, Right
if I remember correctly, Stalingrad has a dominant run offense
Epic fail.
You don't even know the actual name of the play you ran against us.
It's called the Halfback slam, same play out of both formations. It's the most broken play in this game, tbh.
I could take any team in this league and run that play exclusively out of 2-3 formations and win every game.
It's called cheese, dude.
gatorfan
offline
offline
Originally posted by OSUmike03
Oh I learned from it alright. I learned that you guys are cheap motherfuckers who don't like to play the game the way it's supposed to be played.
It's just like the retarded 12 year olds who will play Madden, pick the Patriots, and just throw to Moss every single play.
Does it work? Sometimes it does, and sometimes it doesn't. But it's what makes the game unplayable. It's boring, it's juvenile, and it's pointless.
Next time, I'll make sure to play a team run by 2 year olds. Them just pressing buttons is probably just as smart as what you guys did. So congrats.
If there are rules, regulations, ethical protocols, and/or strict guidelines on how to game plan in GLB, please post the links here because I'm not aware of them.
When I was an owner and defensive coordinator I ran the exact same defensive play for each offense type. Is that unethical as well?
Perhaps your vile angst comes from the fact that your state's colleges can't win a bowl game. OK...that was a cheap shot
Oh I learned from it alright. I learned that you guys are cheap motherfuckers who don't like to play the game the way it's supposed to be played.
It's just like the retarded 12 year olds who will play Madden, pick the Patriots, and just throw to Moss every single play.
Does it work? Sometimes it does, and sometimes it doesn't. But it's what makes the game unplayable. It's boring, it's juvenile, and it's pointless.
Next time, I'll make sure to play a team run by 2 year olds. Them just pressing buttons is probably just as smart as what you guys did. So congrats.
If there are rules, regulations, ethical protocols, and/or strict guidelines on how to game plan in GLB, please post the links here because I'm not aware of them.
When I was an owner and defensive coordinator I ran the exact same defensive play for each offense type. Is that unethical as well?
Perhaps your vile angst comes from the fact that your state's colleges can't win a bowl game. OK...that was a cheap shot
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
