Warrior General Games

How many players on your team have over 100 in 1 attribute? How many are close? Post your numbers here. Don't mention which players or which attributes.
100 or over: 5
almost 1000: 6
I think this is a fun way to compare teams that has no meaning whatsoever... I'm bored

1000? DAMN!!!!

Dayton has:
Over 100: 3
Over 90: 9 (additional)

We have built more balanced so whenever the sim changes, we don't go in the crapper as a team.

Over 100 2
Over 90 6

None over 100
5 over 90

Players with over 100 in an attribute, at level 40 or lower, have sacrificed other important ones and are therefore usually less productive.

Originally posted by Awhite

Players with over 100 in an attribute, at level 40 or lower, have sacrificed other important ones and are therefore usually less productive.

Agreed

Originally posted by ultrajer
Originally posted by Awhite


Players with over 100 in an attribute, at level 40 or lower, have sacrificed other important ones and are therefore usually less productive.

Agreed

I agree with balanced builds, but our team members who are over 100 are still good. It's not like they forgot to add other attributes, they just made that one amazing.

Originally posted by Awhite
None over 100
5 over 90

Players with over 100 in an attribute, at level 40 or lower, have sacrificed other important ones and are therefore usually less productive.

agree for the most part, but there are a few instances where the additional points could cause a big mismatch without costing yourself a game

Originally posted by JasonArgos
Originally posted by Awhite

None over 100
5 over 90

Players with over 100 in an attribute, at level 40 or lower, have sacrificed other important ones and are therefore usually less productive.

agree for the most part, but there are a few instances where the additional points could cause a big mismatch without costing yourself a game

The stat I see the most 100's in is speed, and without enough agility, it's a waste in most cases.

Originally posted by Drewg81
Originally posted by JasonArgos

Originally posted by Awhite


None over 100
5 over 90

Players with over 100 in an attribute, at level 40 or lower, have sacrificed other important ones and are therefore usually less productive.

agree for the most part, but there are a few instances where the additional points could cause a big mismatch without costing yourself a game

The stat I see the most 100's in is speed, and without enough agility, it's a waste in most cases.



Not if your running a go route..

We actually don't have 1 speed at 100. Most of ours come from strength...

Originally posted by wacand
Originally posted by Drewg81

Originally posted by JasonArgos


Originally posted by Awhite



None over 100
5 over 90

Players with over 100 in an attribute, at level 40 or lower, have sacrificed other important ones and are therefore usually less productive.

agree for the most part, but there are a few instances where the additional points could cause a big mismatch without costing yourself a game

The stat I see the most 100's in is speed, and without enough agility, it's a waste in most cases.



Not if your running a go route..

My CB can still cover it. SA's make up the difference.

Originally posted by LionsLover
We actually don't have 1 speed at 100. Most of ours come from strength...

I can see that with O-linemen, and mine is close to 100 as well. I just think there are a lot of positions that try to max out a stat that can't keep a solid balance. Look at what happened to a lot of tackles. They loaded up on strength and blocking, and got toasted by high agility/speed DE's. Luckily, not a lot of D-tackles went that route initially, or my guard would have been fucked.

Well the point of putting something so out of proportion is to create mismatches, but you can't neglect your other attributes. I know a lot of DEs who were supposedly "good" had around 30 strength, and they now completely suck. While DEs have been nerfed, I think those type of "flames" builds are stupid, but there is nothing wrong with favoring a single attribute.

Originally posted by LionsLover
Well the point of putting something so out of proportion is to create mismatches, but you can't neglect your other attributes. I know a lot of DEs who were supposedly "good" had around 30 strength, and they now completely suck. While DEs have been nerfed, I think those type of "flames" builds are stupid, but there is nothing wrong with favoring a single attribute.

Exactly. Favoring one is different than only having one. Flames got away with it for a few seasons...and now he's all but done.