Nice job Marvins. There's obviously something wrong with us.
KellerFox
offline
offline
Im a little suprised by the results as well, I wasnt expecting that... especially after the romping you put on the Beavers last week. Our offense was clicking today and your QB just couldnt get things going. Hope to see you again in the playoffs.
Robbnva
offline
offline
can we please put E. Marvins or M. Marvins in the future. I keep getting a big head and then get deflated when I actually click on the link
KellerFox
offline
offline
No, we are the Marvins and everyone here has known us as that since season 3. How about we are the Marvins and yall are the Marvins B or Marvins 2. 
Crixtala
offline
offline
Originally posted by Robbnva
can we please put E. Marvins or M. Marvins in the future. I keep getting a big head and then get deflated when I actually click on the link
Plus, the thread said the Marvins are good... that should have been a clear sign that the thread was about us.
can we please put E. Marvins or M. Marvins in the future. I keep getting a big head and then get deflated when I actually click on the link
Plus, the thread said the Marvins are good... that should have been a clear sign that the thread was about us.
natethedude
offline
offline
Originally posted by Crixtala
Originally posted by Robbnva
can we please put E. Marvins or M. Marvins in the future. I keep getting a big head and then get deflated when I actually click on the link
Plus, the thread said the Marvins are good... that should have been a clear sign that the thread was about us.
Clearly our 73-7 win doesnt qualify us as good.
Originally posted by Robbnva
can we please put E. Marvins or M. Marvins in the future. I keep getting a big head and then get deflated when I actually click on the link
Plus, the thread said the Marvins are good... that should have been a clear sign that the thread was about us.
Clearly our 73-7 win doesnt qualify us as good.
Robbnva
offline
offline
Originally posted by natethedude
Originally posted by Crixtala
Originally posted by Robbnva
can we please put E. Marvins or M. Marvins in the future. I keep getting a big head and then get deflated when I actually click on the link
Plus, the thread said the Marvins are good... that should have been a clear sign that the thread was about us.
Clearly our 73-7 win doesnt qualify us as good.
clearly, maybe we will get some respect after we win our next 3 which is by far the toughest part of our schedule.
Originally posted by Crixtala
Originally posted by Robbnva
can we please put E. Marvins or M. Marvins in the future. I keep getting a big head and then get deflated when I actually click on the link
Plus, the thread said the Marvins are good... that should have been a clear sign that the thread was about us.
Clearly our 73-7 win doesnt qualify us as good.
clearly, maybe we will get some respect after we win our next 3 which is by far the toughest part of our schedule.
Robbnva
offline
offline
Originally posted by Crixtala
Originally posted by Robbnva
can we please put E. Marvins or M. Marvins in the future. I keep getting a big head and then get deflated when I actually click on the link
Plus, the thread said the Marvins are good... that should have been a clear sign that the thread was about us.
yeah I forgot, Marvins are good but Marvins 2 are like what Tony the Tiger says. GREAT!
Originally posted by Robbnva
can we please put E. Marvins or M. Marvins in the future. I keep getting a big head and then get deflated when I actually click on the link
Plus, the thread said the Marvins are good... that should have been a clear sign that the thread was about us.
yeah I forgot, Marvins are good but Marvins 2 are like what Tony the Tiger says. GREAT!
KellerFox
offline
offline
They found him dead in a New York ally a few years back, he had over dosed... its a sad story.
KellerFox
offline
offline
Originally posted by natethedude
Originally posted by Crixtala
Originally posted by Robbnva
can we please put E. Marvins or M. Marvins in the future. I keep getting a big head and then get deflated when I actually click on the link
Plus, the thread said the Marvins are good... that should have been a clear sign that the thread was about us.
Clearly our 73-7 win doesnt qualify us as good.
Well, you have yet to play anyone... one team that was gutted this season, one last season, and another that is fresh off relegation from Pro that is a few levels behind the better teams in the league. Not to mention the beat down we gave yall last season in our scrimage reasoning aside. I think yall are a good team and will definately be playoff bound, but yall have yet to do anything to command respect yet at this level.
Originally posted by Crixtala
Originally posted by Robbnva
can we please put E. Marvins or M. Marvins in the future. I keep getting a big head and then get deflated when I actually click on the link
Plus, the thread said the Marvins are good... that should have been a clear sign that the thread was about us.
Clearly our 73-7 win doesnt qualify us as good.
Well, you have yet to play anyone... one team that was gutted this season, one last season, and another that is fresh off relegation from Pro that is a few levels behind the better teams in the league. Not to mention the beat down we gave yall last season in our scrimage reasoning aside. I think yall are a good team and will definately be playoff bound, but yall have yet to do anything to command respect yet at this level.
Last edited Sep 25, 2008 17:52:07
GMathiasf
offline
offline
Originally posted by natethedude
Originally posted by Crixtala
Originally posted by Robbnva
can we please put E. Marvins or M. Marvins in the future. I keep getting a big head and then get deflated when I actually click on the link
Plus, the thread said the Marvins are good... that should have been a clear sign that the thread was about us.
Clearly our 73-7 win doesnt qualify us as good.
You can't be serious? The week before that team lost by 84. You don't get judged for beating up on bad teams. You can't be that stupid.
Originally posted by Crixtala
Originally posted by Robbnva
can we please put E. Marvins or M. Marvins in the future. I keep getting a big head and then get deflated when I actually click on the link
Plus, the thread said the Marvins are good... that should have been a clear sign that the thread was about us.
Clearly our 73-7 win doesnt qualify us as good.
You can't be serious? The week before that team lost by 84. You don't get judged for beating up on bad teams. You can't be that stupid.
Crixtala
offline
offline
Originally posted by KellerFox
They found him dead in a New York ally a few years back, he had over dosed... its a sad story.
Cocaine gets the best of 'em... I always thought he looked a little on edge and had entirely too much energy.
They found him dead in a New York ally a few years back, he had over dosed... its a sad story.
Cocaine gets the best of 'em... I always thought he looked a little on edge and had entirely too much energy.
ajii
offline
offline
Originally posted by Crixtala
Originally posted by KellerFox
They found him dead in a New York ally a few years back, he had over dosed... its a sad story.
Cocaine gets the best of 'em... I always thought he looked a little on edge and had entirely too much energy.
Cocaine my ass...he OD'd from sugar! I found him and my son all hopped up on sugar one night...kicked the stripes off that tiger for that one. I feel kinda bad about it now.
Originally posted by KellerFox
They found him dead in a New York ally a few years back, he had over dosed... its a sad story.
Cocaine gets the best of 'em... I always thought he looked a little on edge and had entirely too much energy.
Cocaine my ass...he OD'd from sugar! I found him and my son all hopped up on sugar one night...kicked the stripes off that tiger for that one. I feel kinda bad about it now.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
