User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
misterbing
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by EYLive
This is like midgets arguing over who's tallest.

"WHAT BETTER POSSIBLE WAY could there be to compare the relative strength of the other teams in the league"
Gee, I don't know, how about having each team play each other?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controlling_for_a_variable
Last edited Aug 26, 2008 17:01:19
 
bacardi
offline
Link
 
its as if the more you type, the stupider you get.

apparently the best way to judge a team's quality is by comparing to the stackers. since you lost 0-42, your super tactics must have been incredible. i can accept that. hey just for fun, lets pick another team - i have no clue whos good in alpha - how about the buddhas. the stackers beat them 79-7!! wow you guys are practically twice as good as the buddhas!!!

wait no they beat you. but how can that be??? you lost to the stackers by half!!! this doesnt make sense!!
Originally posted by EYLive
"WHAT BETTER POSSIBLE WAY could there be to compare the relative strength of the other teams in the league"
Gee, I don't know, how about having each team play each other?

whats obvious to the rest of the world might take idiots a while to understand. i gave him too much credit and just thought he was playing retarded in the beginning with the 0-42 bragging. i didnt realize he was actually retarded.
 
groundzero
offline
Link
 

congrats on your tactical genius 42-0 loss.

rationalize that one all you want, any way you sum it up you're still retarded.
 
BadgerPhil
offline
Link
 
http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a289/amature/special_olympics.jpg
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.