Warrior General Games

Originally posted by AnotherLawyer
Originally posted by nance11

Holy crap! 4 sacks for -28 yards! That matches my sack total from last year. If i did this good i can only imagine how Magnus did..

8 sacks. *cry*

Yeah I really have no idea how he's doing it. Paris and Aarhus' lines are no slouches either.


Very intense game Aarhus, your guy's D is still very strong, especially Dorsey and Mayweather. I have no idea how Dorsey chased down some of those plays.


Also, a tie finally, haha. We were long overdue for one.

Originally posted by SpicySweetChiliDoritos
Originally posted by Blutoski

Stockholm vs Bordeaux is a game of the week. Both of us have big hopes this year and neither wants to start out 0-2. It will be hard fought.

Well neither of us started out 0-2...

Good and frustrating game

It was our... 3-4 FG not attempted because of the mistake of Bort with his explanation of the FG range.

That has pissed me off this stuff. A tie is better than a loss but (sorry Stockholm) but normally you would have lost the game. I have counted 2-3 Not attempted FG if the IA followed my orders. But apparently that was more about 33-17= 16 yards the range of my FGs...

Congrats to Southampton for getting their first WEAA1 win, and vs a perennial playoff team in Armagh, that's a good sign for them and a big win.

And Cedo, It looks like your team punted late in the game instead of trying a 50 yd FG, then went for it on 4th and 4.5 rather than kick a 53.5 yd FG and then in overtime, you had opportunities for 54 and 51 yd FGs but punted on both occasions.

Are you sure all of these FGs are in your kickers range? Especially, late in the game when his energy would have shortened his range even further?

I just checked and your kicker has never even attempted a 50+ yd FG in his career. So even if you forced him to kick one via the AI, I don't think he had much chance at all at making a 50, 53.5, 54, or 51 yard FG.

Just my 2 cents.

Cedo, I know what you're saying. We also punted rather than try a 53 yarder with time running down, but you seemed to get burnt worse. In another league Sam (SJMay) and I GM, we lost 31-21 after we screwed up the AI and tried 6 field goals over 50 yards including 96 and 78 yards. Did I mention I hate the AI?

I turned the AIs off for our game today...

I'm very frustrated with the offensive AI.

Defensive, less so, but I'm still finding quirks in it. It's been tough figuring out who's responsible for which receiver without getting burnt.

Badgers start 2-0 for the first time. Next game's gonna be a lot tougher, as we're back to being out-levelled more or less all over the field.

The matchup bars are certainly against us this time.

Originally posted by Wrath Of Conor
Congrats to Southampton for getting their first WEAA1 win, and vs a perennial playoff team in Armagh, that's a good sign for them and a big win.



Thanks.

Good game Inverness. You guys handed us our first loss in the history of our franchise. Looks like we don't quite measure up just yet. Good luck the rest of the way.

Originally posted by Wrath Of Conor
And Cedo, It looks like your team punted late in the game instead of trying a 50 yd FG, then went for it on 4th and 4.5 rather than kick a 53.5 yd FG and then in overtime, you had opportunities for 54 and 51 yd FGs but punted on both occasions.

Are you sure all of these FGs are in your kickers range? Especially, late in the game when his energy would have shortened his range even further?

I just checked and your kicker has never even attempted a 50+ yd FG in his career. So even if you forced him to kick one via the AI, I don't think he had much chance at all at making a 50, 53.5, 54, or 51 yard FG.

Just my 2 cents.

a few of the 40-49 yard FGs where in the upper bracket 47-49 yards, and im sure he will be better with the new kicking tweaks. im confident that had we gone for it he could have gotten at least 1 of the long range kicks.
that said he hasnt kicked any 50+ and theres only 1 way to tell if he can make them or not so i guess only time will tell with that

They were long kicks that are borderline either way. At the beginning of the game, I think you could confidently say that yes, he would make one of them. Towards the end, the chances would decline as he missed each one due to morale factors.

So I think it's a toss up either way, no disrespect meant.

If not for this play though, we certainly would have lost:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=88437&pbp_id=1343160

Originally posted by bmedders
They were long kicks that are borderline either way. At the beginning of the game, I think you could confidently say that yes, he would make one of them. Towards the end, the chances would decline as he missed each one due to morale factors.

So I think it's a toss up either way, no disrespect meant.

If not for this play though, we certainly would have lost:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=88437&pbp_id=1343160

Yes one of them

But i'm sure i can find one play or two were the situation could be inverted

Emotion left, i'm quite satisfied with this Tie. We played #2 and #5 (last season) and we had 1 close loss and 1 tie (favorable) so sincerely, i can't ask for more ^^