Warrior General Games

People getting banned makes me a sad panda.

On a positive note for flounder - he can spend the time he usually uses arguing to sort out his team finances!

I find the term OFFLINE to be really funny nowadays.

I think just a few days. I am not sure to be honest.

Originally posted by EmpYllek
People getting banned makes me a sad panda.

On a positive note for flounder - he can spend the time he usually uses arguing to sort out his team finances!


They are ok he started selling off his players to make money for this team. It really is kind of a nice idea if you think about it. Sign a bunch of your players to one year deals and then sell them off to other owners. Let them play their year and then resign and resell them again for more money. Then you don't have to worry about how badly you screwed up your finances.

See its business models like that that are screwing the world. Well that and having right wing governments in Russia,Germany,France,China (theyre not lefty in any sense of the word never mind real communists) and the US.

But back on point - Id be pissed off if my owner did that (he wont as hes sensible). Id want to compete every year. Ohh yeah he owns all his teams players. My bad.

Goddam, you can spot the people who failed at social studies pretty easily as well as those who flunked finance, microeconomics, etc etc.

Not a bad idea, as an owner you could make 4 players with the sole purpose of selling them at the beginning of each season, you are looking at 1 mill+ each season.

Would like to see some rule that a player can't sign with the same team twice within two seasons.

If youre implying that I dont know anything about economics and....hang on what the fuck is social studies? Is that that class that you get talked to about drugs and shit that no one ever goes to except to get free condoms and even then no one went because I went to catholic school and condoms are the devils sperm (way to go Rome! help spread AIDS!).

Again back on point - im not suggesting that far left economic policy would work either its just you sort of need a balance. All this right heavy crap going on now with its "BUY NOW! SAVINGS ARE FOR TERRORISTS!!!" results in "HOLY SHIT I PAID £500,000 pounds for a two bedroom flat in Elephant & Castle" (think Detroit but shittier). That and people who vote for righty parties are going straight to hell. Jesus was a socialist after all. However, a little balance and we can all be like Sweden. Sure youre taxed to fuck but you have a much better quality of life.

On a negative note that bitch Thatcher is getting a state funeral. Way to piss money away in a depression. Just put her coffin on soft ground and the force of 30 million decent British people pissing on it will force it six feet under in seconds.

Man Im being random tonight.

Fuck me, never thought someone on this board would make flounder look like fuckin Alan Greenspan but you just hit that ball out of the park.

Hang on you honestly thinking having a mixed set of ideaologies among the major economic powers is a BAD thing? Youre kidding right? It makes the most sense. It brings the overall economic picture towards the middle of the political spectrum. When you have Britain sitting as a middle economic power and everyone else to the right you allow for the extremes which allow recession.

Of course I could simplify it and say that our last economic recession of any real note (to the normal guy the dotcom bust is kind of meh) at the start of the 90s came after successive Nazi....sorry right wing governments in the US and UK (just die already Thatcher).

By the way I fucking hate American liberals as much as Republicans so id rather not be called a liberal in any reply supporting the evil that rules most of the world. But hey universal health care and education is WRONG!

This thread sure got way off topic quickly

Blame the enemies of the people. If theyd just let me fly my red flag things would go back on topic fast.

Originally posted by nfratami
Not a bad idea, as an owner you could make 4 players with the sole purpose of selling them at the beginning of each season, you are looking at 1 mill+ each season.

Would like to see some rule that a player can't sign with the same team twice within two seasons.

Exactly and there is downside really for the team as he can take that $1M and fund that into player salaries. It is really like additional income that you can take advantage of in the game.

$1M? That's a lot of hookers and blow.

not really. I mean I have no idea.