Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Cybertron
Then cap the S*s at each level. Or some kind of combo.

Limiting team build options doesn't make a lot of since at this stage of the game. But if it's done it should be a hard cap, not per tier. Tiers aren't balanced on offense and defense

Originally posted by BoDiddley
Limiting team build options doesn't make a lot of since at this stage of the game. But if it's done it should be a hard cap, not per tier. Tiers aren't balanced on offense and defense


I agree. A lot of people are saying 10, so I think that's fine. The bigger point would be uncapped S* creation if you have the benchmarks for multiples.

Originally posted by ellix
I agree. A lot of people are saying 10, so I think that's fine. The bigger point would be uncapped S* creation if you have the benchmarks for multiples.

10 is a lot... its almost literally an entire offense or defense.

Originally posted by vipermaw82
10 is a lot... its almost literally an entire offense or defense.

We did see that team who had 16 once didn't we? It was rubbish, but still.

Anyways, Bo is right, at this stage we really don't need caps anyway.

Originally posted by Myrik_Justiciar
that's a pretty good idea too... stops flooding the game with S*DTs this way.

Now if they flipped CB base salary with LB (the moment I did it I actually wondered if it was a code/unintentional mistake because it's obvious) AND then moved FB to Tier 3, we'd have the blueprint for a lot different roster composition over the next 55 seasons than the past 55 ones.

Originally posted by Xars
Now if they flipped CB base salary with LB (the moment I did it I actually wondered if it was a code/unintentional mistake because it's obvious) AND then moved FB to Tier 3, we'd have the blueprint for a lot different roster composition over the next 55 seasons than the past 55 ones.


I've always wondered why FB isn't a tier 3.

Originally posted by Cybertron
I've always wondered why FB isn't a tier 3.

Pretty sure it's because they're a running back.

Originally posted by Adderfist
Pretty sure it's because they're a running back.

Theoretically, Tier 1 players have better caps and SP costs than Tier 2 or Tier 3.

I'm ok with tweaking down a FB to Tier 3 caps/SP cost model since it would be a prominent choice for a S*.

As a Tier 2, S* FB just don't have much of a role.

After making so many S* DTs, I considered going S* Punter and S* Kicker.

Originally posted by Xars
Theoretically, Tier 1 players have better caps and SP costs than Tier 2 or Tier 3.

I'm ok with tweaking down a FB to Tier 3 caps/SP cost model since it would be a prominent choice for a S*.

As a Tier 2, S* FB just don't have much of a role.

After making so many S* DTs, I considered going S* Punter and S* Kicker.

I don't disagree that it should be a tier 3, Just in the way it's set on offense. all positions that touch the ball are t2-1

Originally posted by Adderfist
I don't disagree that it should be a tier 3, Just in the way it's set on offense. all positions that touch the ball are t2-1


Center is a T3.

Originally posted by Raid
Center is a T3.

I f*ck that up all the time