Warrior General Games

Look at rookie ladder rankings.

10 Roosevelt's Rough Riders : 9-7-1
11 Sons of Alderran Rebel Scum : 9-7-1
12 Nebraska Cornhuskers 94-95 : 10-7
13 1980s NCAA Legends of the Gridiron : 10-7
14 Viking Raiders : 10-7

https://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/rankings?tier=Rookie

Ladder rankings don't work that way, they work off who you have beaten and who you have lost to in ladder, gaining points per win and gaining more for winning against stronger opponents.

That's how Plainville are above the Yetis in Vet at the moment.

https://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/rankings?tier=Veteran

It more than often does tend to line up with more wins overall meaning a higher rank, though.

I understand that but do you think it is pure coincidence that the 2 teams with 9-7-1 record have better "wins" than the 3 with 10-7 records? Just seems highly unlikely.

Originally posted by Cybertron
I understand that but do you think it is pure coincidence that the 2 teams with 9-7-1 record have better "wins" than the 3 with 10-7 records? Just seems highly unlikely.

Cursory glance shows RRs have a head to head win against 1980s and Rebels have one over Raiders, And Nebraska has lost points by a loss to the Wranglers and earlier to the Annual East/West Collegiate Bowl.


So yeah, looks about right.

- double post.

Originally posted by Cybertron
I understand that but do you think it is pure coincidence that the 2 teams with 9-7-1 record have better "wins" than the 3 with 10-7 records? Just seems highly unlikely.

Isn't the point of coincidences that they seem highly unlikely?