Wrong forum
Edited by Galactic Empire on Jul 14, 2017 19:40:27
Edited by Galactic Empire on Jul 14, 2017 19:39:50
Forum > Suggestions > Increase S* salaries
Galactic Empire
offline
offline
Originally posted by McLovinCowboys
They should get rid of conditioning
Heeellll no. Then there would be no need for depth and all the teams would just load up on S*s and put low salary guys to fill in the void/bench. Dumbest idea ever.
Depth actually should be needed more. They should actually make stamina drain faster so we would have to use more depth, bigger rosters and less S*s per team.
They should get rid of conditioning
Heeellll no. Then there would be no need for depth and all the teams would just load up on S*s and put low salary guys to fill in the void/bench. Dumbest idea ever.
Depth actually should be needed more. They should actually make stamina drain faster so we would have to use more depth, bigger rosters and less S*s per team.
bhall43
offline
offline
Not sure what low salary has to do with conditioning besides morale possibly partially effecting it's levels.
McLovinCowboys
offline
offline
Originally posted by Galactic Empire
Heeellll no. Then there would be no need for depth and all the teams would just load up on S*s and put low salary guys to fill in the void/bench. Dumbest idea ever.
Depth actually should be needed more. They should actually make stamina drain faster so we would have to use more depth, bigger rosters and less S*s per team.
Cmon GE, i can't beat your dumb ideas by a mile.
But why wouldn't be need for depth? Depends how they make it, i'm saying they could get rid of conditioning skill up, they could just use default for every player.
I'm not saying "no energy", players would get tired, and need to be subbed out, etc, the way it is everyone gets 75+ conditioning for S*s and they play in all snaps anyways...
Heeellll no. Then there would be no need for depth and all the teams would just load up on S*s and put low salary guys to fill in the void/bench. Dumbest idea ever.
Depth actually should be needed more. They should actually make stamina drain faster so we would have to use more depth, bigger rosters and less S*s per team.
Cmon GE, i can't beat your dumb ideas by a mile.
But why wouldn't be need for depth? Depends how they make it, i'm saying they could get rid of conditioning skill up, they could just use default for every player.
I'm not saying "no energy", players would get tired, and need to be subbed out, etc, the way it is everyone gets 75+ conditioning for S*s and they play in all snaps anyways...
McLovinCowboys
offline
offline
Originally posted by McLovinCowboys
Cmon GE, i can't beat your dumb ideas by a mile.
But why wouldn't be need for depth? Depends how they make it, i'm saying they could get rid of conditioning skill up, they could just use default for every player.
I'm not saying "no energy", players would get tired, and need to be subbed out, etc, the way it is everyone gets 75+ conditioning for S*s and they play in all snaps anyways...
And 100 for HBs
Cmon GE, i can't beat your dumb ideas by a mile.
But why wouldn't be need for depth? Depends how they make it, i'm saying they could get rid of conditioning skill up, they could just use default for every player.
I'm not saying "no energy", players would get tired, and need to be subbed out, etc, the way it is everyone gets 75+ conditioning for S*s and they play in all snaps anyways...
And 100 for HBs
Galactic Empire
offline
offline
Originally posted by McLovinCowboys
Cmon GE, i can't beat your dumb ideas by a mile.
But why wouldn't be need for depth? Depends how they make it, i'm saying they could get rid of conditioning skill up, they could just use default for every player.
I'm not saying "no energy", players would get tired, and need to be subbed out, etc, the way it is everyone gets 75+ conditioning for S*s and they play in all snaps anyways...
So you don't want to get rid of conditioning, you want everybody to have the same conditioning. Big difference.
Cmon GE, i can't beat your dumb ideas by a mile.
But why wouldn't be need for depth? Depends how they make it, i'm saying they could get rid of conditioning skill up, they could just use default for every player.
I'm not saying "no energy", players would get tired, and need to be subbed out, etc, the way it is everyone gets 75+ conditioning for S*s and they play in all snaps anyways...
So you don't want to get rid of conditioning, you want everybody to have the same conditioning. Big difference.
HayRow
offline
offline
Originally posted by Galactic Empire
So you don't want to get rid of conditioning, you want everybody to have the same conditioning. Big difference.
of course thats what getting rid of cond means haha
So you don't want to get rid of conditioning, you want everybody to have the same conditioning. Big difference.
of course thats what getting rid of cond means haha
Galactic Empire
offline
offline
Originally posted by HayRow
of course thats what getting rid of cond means haha
No it doesnt. Getting rid of conditioning = never having to sub. Giving everybody average conditioning = subbing a ton.
of course thats what getting rid of cond means haha
No it doesnt. Getting rid of conditioning = never having to sub. Giving everybody average conditioning = subbing a ton.
Myrik_Justiciar
offline
offline
I pushed for a conditioning cap or adjustment once the meta made HB's OP to try and force substitutions, but it was ignored... after that I went with the whole if you can't beat them, join them and now I don't care. I just look at the stats in this game as if its NCAA, not NFL.
Edited by Myrik_Justiciar on Jul 16, 2017 12:47:56
Players Salaries 
what can they spend that salary on? 
Oh yeah I forgot...nothing
what can they spend that salary on? Oh yeah I forgot...nothing
Originally posted by Team Nucleus
Players Salaries what can they spend that salary on?
Oh yeah I forgot...nothing
It's all about roster configuration and high salaries at the optimal positions.
It's not about how much a player can make but rather how much a team can spend.
Players Salaries what can they spend that salary on?
Oh yeah I forgot...nothing
It's all about roster configuration and high salaries at the optimal positions.
It's not about how much a player can make but rather how much a team can spend.
Originally posted by DeeVee8
It's all about roster configuration and high salaries at the optimal positions.
It's not about how much a player can make but rather how much a team can spend.
Wouldn't it be wiser to fix the salary roster cap than it is to raise player salaries?
It's all about roster configuration and high salaries at the optimal positions.
It's not about how much a player can make but rather how much a team can spend.
Wouldn't it be wiser to fix the salary roster cap than it is to raise player salaries?
Edited by Team Nucleus on Jul 19, 2017 13:34:24
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
