Warrior General Games

do you think it would be worth it.

maybe just risks having so so many other skills lacking the ability to use 100 int.

you miss out on alot pf runstop but coverage shoould be fine at least with a S*

with all the WR's with low CiT out there and boost to int's lately i would say it might be worth it if you only lose run things

It'd be impossible to have decent coverage. Even in my theoretical builds going S* + Early Bloomer, I only have enough leftover SP to get intercepting to 80 ish after getting decent coverage skills (100 man aware, 90 cov tech, 80 deflect, 66 quickness, 76 sprint, 88 footwork).

Edit: Actually I got pretty damn close to 100 with pretty good coverage skills. Absolutely 0 run defense ability however. Might be interesting to pair this guy with another S* Corner that can cover the Run.

http://www.glb2scout.com/virtualplayer.php?Code=2e0bff759d057e28460eaa5b2cb118e5

Originally posted by Mysterio
It'd be impossible to have decent coverage. Even in my theoretical builds going S* + Early Bloomer, I only have enough leftover SP to get intercepting to 80 ish after getting decent coverage skills (100 man aware, 90 cov tech, 80 deflect, 66 quickness, 76 sprint, 88 footwork).

Those are very good coverage skills. I'm sure you could lower them to decent and get Intercepting up to 100. First thing I would sacrifice is all the Deflecting. That is not a cheap skill, and you want to catch the ball, not knock it down.

Some on here argue that you don't even need coverage tech, which might be true if you have the physical attributes to make up for it, which is so expensive...

100 int might be worth it if you're in a division with all pass heavy teams.

i almost tried to do a build like this instead of my safety, now i am debating when the safety retires to try it again