It would help make the game more transparent and would answer a great deal of questions people might have about the game. I really don't see a downside to it that can be reasonably argued.
Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > Vet Leagues - game 3 - the end of division round
Galithor
offline
offline
Originally posted by jfbueno
It would help make the game more transparent and would answer a great deal of questions people might have about the game. I really don't see a downside to it that can be reasonably argued.
Reason 1: It's not working right and guys like Stobie or Xars would immediately point out the flaws after presented with the numbers
It would help make the game more transparent and would answer a great deal of questions people might have about the game. I really don't see a downside to it that can be reasonably argued.
Reason 1: It's not working right and guys like Stobie or Xars would immediately point out the flaws after presented with the numbers
Galithor
offline
offline
Originally posted by jfbueno
Ha well then it should be a welcome addition so they can get help in fixing it
That's assuming that Corndog's being asked to work on GLB2 more often than "hey it's a few days until GLB2's offseason. You probably better go throw a few things together to appease the masses".
I really don't think there's more than 20 hours a season at this point being put into GLB2 development.
Ha well then it should be a welcome addition so they can get help in fixing it
That's assuming that Corndog's being asked to work on GLB2 more often than "hey it's a few days until GLB2's offseason. You probably better go throw a few things together to appease the masses".
I really don't think there's more than 20 hours a season at this point being put into GLB2 development.
jfbueno
offline
offline
Which is sad given the potential of the sim. Instead they just work on what they consider the latest greatest game
Whether it's mighty brawlers or whatever other game they're working on.
Whether it's mighty brawlers or whatever other game they're working on.
Time Trial
offline
offline
Originally posted by TxSteve
TT beats the Long Island Knights by 10 (moving TT to a quiet 5-0 record)
I don't know what I need to do to get any ladder respect. [sarcastic]
Four of the five wins were against winless teams or teams that are down a tier in the ladder.
The Knights were a nice surprise... I'm guessing that the only reason that they had success last season was due to my awesome blocking FB that they dropped in the offseason.
TT beats the Long Island Knights by 10 (moving TT to a quiet 5-0 record)
I don't know what I need to do to get any ladder respect. [sarcastic]
Four of the five wins were against winless teams or teams that are down a tier in the ladder.
The Knights were a nice surprise... I'm guessing that the only reason that they had success last season was due to my awesome blocking FB that they dropped in the offseason.
Time Trial
offline
offline
Originally posted by jfbueno
People have been calling for posting of ELO scores or at the very least some type of indication where teams stand besides just a numerical tiered system. Of course it won't happen after 10 seasons but the reasoning behind not posting the scores from what I remember was asinine.
The funny thing is that they were so opposed to publishing the ELO in this game, but they gave public ELO in Mighty Brawlers from day one.
People have been calling for posting of ELO scores or at the very least some type of indication where teams stand besides just a numerical tiered system. Of course it won't happen after 10 seasons but the reasoning behind not posting the scores from what I remember was asinine.
The funny thing is that they were so opposed to publishing the ELO in this game, but they gave public ELO in Mighty Brawlers from day one.
jfbueno
offline
offline
Originally posted by Time Trial
The funny thing is that they were so opposed to publishing the ELO in this game, but they gave public ELO in Mighty Brawlers from day one.
Never really thought about that. Good luck getting a response from Corndog on that one.
The funny thing is that they were so opposed to publishing the ELO in this game, but they gave public ELO in Mighty Brawlers from day one.
Never really thought about that. Good luck getting a response from Corndog on that one.
tezed
offline
offline
Run GLB took down DA in a pretty lopsided affair - http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/168300
Run Defenders v. Capua Gladiators was quite a fun watch - http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/168304
Run Defenders v. Capua Gladiators was quite a fun watch - http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/168304
Originally posted by Time Trial
The funny thing is that they were so opposed to publishing the ELO in this game, but they gave public ELO in Mighty Brawlers from day one.
I would guess it might be because something is screwed up with it, or there isn't really an elo. But very well could be wrong, just seems hypocritical to say no for GLB but ok for MB
The funny thing is that they were so opposed to publishing the ELO in this game, but they gave public ELO in Mighty Brawlers from day one.
I would guess it might be because something is screwed up with it, or there isn't really an elo. But very well could be wrong, just seems hypocritical to say no for GLB but ok for MB
TDiddy8701
offline
offline
Run GLB will be ranked higher than i did previously next time I vote the top 10... that's one hell of an impressive win over DA, and a nice back to back showing against 2 of the top 4 or 5 teams in the game. That is one team I am not looking forward to playing.
Edited by TDiddy8701 on Apr 1, 2015 03:15:51
Edited by TDiddy8701 on Apr 1, 2015 03:15:23
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
