Though I bet in about 3-4 seasons there will be a LOT less fumbles and KL at WR/TE than there are now just by simple build plan changes.
Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > Why? WHY? what the hell?
bhall43
offline
offline
Actually I have forced more fumbles in league games (15) this season than Rusty has intercepted balls (14) in every game this season. So the INT chance could improve crowd probably has a decent point considering I am one of the people actually putting into this skill.
Galithor
offline
offline
Originally posted by peeti
Do you wanna say Strip technique also influences KLs?
No idea. KLs are buggy as it is with the sim having trouble recognizing when to switch from "reception mode" to "carrying mode". I still see KLs happen after carrying the ball downfield for 10+ yards.
Do you wanna say Strip technique also influences KLs?
No idea. KLs are buggy as it is with the sim having trouble recognizing when to switch from "reception mode" to "carrying mode". I still see KLs happen after carrying the ball downfield for 10+ yards.
Absolut Zero
offline
offline
Originally posted by peeti
Do you wanna say Strip technique also influences KLs?
I think I remember seeing Corndog mention it does, as well as tackling technique. How much they influence KL is different for each. My vague impression is that how much they influence KL goes like this:
Power Tackling > Strip Technique > Tackling Technique.
Do you wanna say Strip technique also influences KLs?
I think I remember seeing Corndog mention it does, as well as tackling technique. How much they influence KL is different for each. My vague impression is that how much they influence KL goes like this:
Power Tackling > Strip Technique > Tackling Technique.
Detroit Leos
offline
offline
Originally posted by peeti
Do you wanna say Strip technique also influences KLs?
I would definitely say that it influences KLs based on the Zone Shark change that was added last season and adds Strip Tech and it also makes sense that it would influence it. No idea on how large of an impact it really has if pumped. Hard to get other skills as high for DBs though if strip tech is heavily invested in. I am sure somebody has probably tried it though...
Do you wanna say Strip technique also influences KLs?
I would definitely say that it influences KLs based on the Zone Shark change that was added last season and adds Strip Tech and it also makes sense that it would influence it. No idea on how large of an impact it really has if pumped. Hard to get other skills as high for DBs though if strip tech is heavily invested in. I am sure somebody has probably tried it though...
Galactic Empire
offline
offline
Originally posted by Galithor
Moral to the story:
Strip Technique > Interception
Unless you Gold EOTP...
Moral to the story:
Strip Technique > Interception
Unless you Gold EOTP...
Galactic Empire
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
Actually I have forced more fumbles in league games (15) this season than Rusty has intercepted balls (14) in every game this season. So the INT chance could improve crowd probably has a decent point considering I am one of the people actually putting into this skill.
Just because you force the fumble doesn't mean it is a turnover. An INT is a turnover. Forcing the fumble is half of it. So you if you look at it as if you get %50 of the fumbles, it would be a 7 to 14 ratio of fumble recoveries to INTs.
Actually I have forced more fumbles in league games (15) this season than Rusty has intercepted balls (14) in every game this season. So the INT chance could improve crowd probably has a decent point considering I am one of the people actually putting into this skill.
Just because you force the fumble doesn't mean it is a turnover. An INT is a turnover. Forcing the fumble is half of it. So you if you look at it as if you get %50 of the fumbles, it would be a 7 to 14 ratio of fumble recoveries to INTs.
Edited by Galactic Empire on Mar 3, 2015 11:51:57
Edited by Galactic Empire on Mar 3, 2015 11:51:39
Galithor
offline
offline
Originally posted by Galactic Empire
Unless you Gold EOTP...
How many times do you get EOTP to fire against an all-rush offense?
Unless you Gold EOTP...
How many times do you get EOTP to fire against an all-rush offense?
Galithor
offline
offline
Originally posted by Galactic Empire
Just because you force the fumble doesn't mean it is a turnover. An INT is a turnover. Forcing the fumble is half of it. So you if you look at it as if you get %50 of the fumbles, it would be a 7 to 14 ratio of fumble recoveries to INTs.
Go look at the ratio for passing teams that fumble. When a WR puts the ball on the ground, it's pretty uncommon to have an offensive player nearby to jump on it.
And again, you're not getting any interceptions against an all-rush offense.
Just because you force the fumble doesn't mean it is a turnover. An INT is a turnover. Forcing the fumble is half of it. So you if you look at it as if you get %50 of the fumbles, it would be a 7 to 14 ratio of fumble recoveries to INTs.
Go look at the ratio for passing teams that fumble. When a WR puts the ball on the ground, it's pretty uncommon to have an offensive player nearby to jump on it.
And again, you're not getting any interceptions against an all-rush offense.
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by peeti
Do you wanna say Strip technique also influences KLs?
I think our KL's have picked up since my changes to the lineup and most of the changes i made in regard to tackling was strip tech. fwiw.
Do you wanna say Strip technique also influences KLs?
I think our KL's have picked up since my changes to the lineup and most of the changes i made in regard to tackling was strip tech. fwiw.
Galactic Empire
offline
offline
Originally posted by Galithor
Go look at the ratio for passing teams that fumble. When a WR puts the ball on the ground, it's pretty uncommon to have an offensive player nearby to jump on it.
And again, you're not getting any interceptions against an all-rush offense.
I was referring to his statement that his team has 15 forced fumbles total in league play, not specifically where it occurred on the field.
Go look at the ratio for passing teams that fumble. When a WR puts the ball on the ground, it's pretty uncommon to have an offensive player nearby to jump on it.
And again, you're not getting any interceptions against an all-rush offense.
I was referring to his statement that his team has 15 forced fumbles total in league play, not specifically where it occurred on the field.
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by Galactic Empire
Just because you force the fumble doesn't mean it is a turnover. An INT is a turnover. Forcing the fumble is half of it. So you if you look at it as if you get %50 of the fumbles, it would be a 7 to 14 ratio of fumble recoveries to INTs.
You are right. We only recovered 11 of those 15 fumbles. (in league only)
Just because you force the fumble doesn't mean it is a turnover. An INT is a turnover. Forcing the fumble is half of it. So you if you look at it as if you get %50 of the fumbles, it would be a 7 to 14 ratio of fumble recoveries to INTs.
You are right. We only recovered 11 of those 15 fumbles. (in league only)
Edited by bhall43 on Mar 3, 2015 11:58:10
Xars
offline
offline
Originally posted by peeti
Do you wanna say Strip technique also influences KLs?
My anecdotal info is yes.
I max Power Tackling or Strip on all my CBs, depending on their role. Both seem to help in creating KLs.
Do you wanna say Strip technique also influences KLs?
My anecdotal info is yes.
I max Power Tackling or Strip on all my CBs, depending on their role. Both seem to help in creating KLs.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
