Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Evil Sports Agent
Why would anyone pay a dime to build a player, if you were allowed to have unlimited multi accounts? This is a business after all.

Agreed, but perhaps you missed:

Originally posted by Xars
I think it's better to let people have multi accounts and change the benefit of an account, ie the free player, then to be against multi accounts. Change the benefit. Make the free player only free for Rookie ball. Or something.

Originally posted by Xars
Originally posted by Evil Sports Agent

Why would anyone pay a dime to build a player, if you were allowed to have unlimited multi accounts? This is a business after all.

Agreed, but perhaps you missed:

Originally posted by Xars

I think it's better to let people have multi accounts and change the benefit of an account, ie the free player, then to be against multi accounts. Change the benefit. Make the free player only free for Rookie ball. Or something.



No I didnt missed that, I thought it was a joke... GLB is free to play, your concept would change that completely. Maybe for GLB3 or later, but I dont think that will ever happen on GLB2.

Originally posted by Xars

I think it's better to let people have multi accounts and change the benefit of an account, ie the free player, then to be against multi accounts. Change the benefit. Make the free player only free for Rookie ball. Or something.


At that point, why would someone want multiple accounts other than to own more than one team? If the reason someone wants multiple accounts (other than to exploit the free player) is to own a second team, then it seems like it would make sense to relax the multiple team restriction than to allow multiple accounts, but that's just me. Maybe I'm missing some other legitimate reason why someone would want multiple accounts.