User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
jfbueno
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Homage
We have failed to reach our lofty goal of being #1 overall. Yes. Are we complete utter failures because we got #3 instead when the margin for error is very small? No.

I've been playing games way too long in my life to get butthurt over this stuff. You're reaching here Para. I'm just curious how you're going to handle the MEM vs AGDTD game coming up.


I don't really have much time to DC anymore but it's always nice to have parab00n handling the load. For this one game I could run D tactics for MEM. I guess I would either like it if parab00n ran both teams and let the RNG decide or run neither and let the owners/original OC/DC make gameplans.
 
seahawks3726
offline
Link
 
GG Mem, that was an exciting one!!!!
 
peeti
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by seahawks3726
GG Mem, that was an exciting one!!!!


And I was right

EDIT: 5 out of 6 overall. Not bad
Edited by peeti on Jun 11, 2014 08:14:59
 
Parab00n
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by InRomoWeTrust
I bet wrong and paid for it. Was expecting MO spam and not the formations I gashed the last game.


MO spam vs QC would be about the worst decision you could make. Plus I hate taking risks(blitzing) unless I'm extremely confident that it will work.
 
InRomoWeTrust
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
It would have been a good decision based on my previous games' playcalling. I hedged that you wanted to stop the inside singleback spread offense I was pulling with the inside dives.

I attacked you in previous games with inside rushing since I knew I largely couldn't get outside with your Tunnel Vision DEs set on evasive. I just figured you'd overcompensate based on a higher sense of urgency since you were stripped of number 1. The bet I made clearly hurt. I felt good about how my defense played that game, but obviously the offense didn't pan out.
 
Parab00n
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by InRomoWeTrust
It would have been a good decision based on my previous games' playcalling. I hedged that you wanted to stop the inside singleback spread offense I was pulling with the inside dives.

I attacked you in previous games with inside rushing since I knew I largely couldn't get outside with your Tunnel Vision DEs set on evasive. I just figured you'd overcompensate based on a higher sense of urgency since you were stripped of number 1. The bet I made clearly hurt. I felt good about how my defense played that game, but obviously the offense didn't pan out.


I can live with giving up 5ish yards a carry on those dive plays because I only need 1 stop for no yards on a drive to have a shot at stalling it. What I hate giving up is your way to often 70 yard TD runs where you run through 2 of my defenders with ease.
 
InRomoWeTrust
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
I don't have breakaway speed on either of my backs, so it's closer to ~20 yards than 70. The 70 yard gains tend to come on bad play calls.
 
Jampy2.0
thuggin'
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by InRomoWeTrust
I don't have breakaway speed on either of my backs, so it's closer to ~20 yards than 70. The 70 yard gains tend to come on bad play calls.


you don't need breakaway speed to break away in glb2.
 
InRomoWeTrust
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
You're trying to educate the guy with the top 2 backs in the game? Lol
 
Corndog
Admin
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by InRomoWeTrust
You're trying to educate the guy with the top 2 backs in the game? Lol


http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/57635/2265376?player_id=9685

lol
 
Jampy2.0
thuggin'
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by InRomoWeTrust
You're trying to educate the guy with the top 2 backs in the game? Lol


dude lol. just lol.
 
Jampy2.0
thuggin'
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Corndog
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/57635/2265376?player_id=9685

lol


http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/57626/2053289?player_id=6604

lol
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.