Originally posted by Corndog
And the crusade continues!
but who are the crusaders? Pro-roll out folks....or anti-rollout folks?
And the crusade continues!
but who are the crusaders? Pro-roll out folks....or anti-rollout folks?
Forum > Suggestions > Corndog: Summary of your Bort Meeting possible?
Galithor
offline
offline
Originally posted by TxSteve
but who are the crusaders? Pro-roll out folks....or anti-rollout folks?
Either way, a bunch of folks died.
but who are the crusaders? Pro-roll out folks....or anti-rollout folks?
Either way, a bunch of folks died.
william78
offline
offline
Originally posted by mutleyddmc DTD
I think all QB roll out discussions should stop. Its the same argument over and over.
Corndog knows about it, its in his court now. All we can do is carry on playing.... or not.
Me personally I have given up trying to stop it and if my plays work they work, if not oh well its a game.
I'm not going to argue the point anymore as I indicated above, just want to know if its being discussed. Do they consider it working as intended , want to fix it, considering fixing it?
I'll obviously keep Dakota, but would probably pair down my holdings at the lower rungs and not set up farm teams. As openly as its discussed I'm expecting more than a few will want to run some variation next season of rollout QBs and I'm not really sure I want to see 40 teams running it in rookie ball. At least outta know what their planning which was my original question to Corndog, Did it come up?
I think all QB roll out discussions should stop. Its the same argument over and over.
Corndog knows about it, its in his court now. All we can do is carry on playing.... or not.
Me personally I have given up trying to stop it and if my plays work they work, if not oh well its a game.
I'm not going to argue the point anymore as I indicated above, just want to know if its being discussed. Do they consider it working as intended , want to fix it, considering fixing it?
I'll obviously keep Dakota, but would probably pair down my holdings at the lower rungs and not set up farm teams. As openly as its discussed I'm expecting more than a few will want to run some variation next season of rollout QBs and I'm not really sure I want to see 40 teams running it in rookie ball. At least outta know what their planning which was my original question to Corndog, Did it come up?
Parab00n
offline
offline
Originally posted by mutleyddmc DTD
I think all QB roll out discussions should stop. Its the same argument over and over.
Corndog knows about it, its in his court now. All we can do is carry on playing.... or not.
Me personally I have given up trying to stop it and if my plays work they work, if not oh well its a game.
Some losers(me) are on pace to drop $100 a season into this game, as a business you either fix what your customer base has identified is broken or you lose taht customer base. GLB2 doesn't really seem like it is growing like GLB1 was at this stage so each customer/Agent is pretty important.
I think all QB roll out discussions should stop. Its the same argument over and over.
Corndog knows about it, its in his court now. All we can do is carry on playing.... or not.
Me personally I have given up trying to stop it and if my plays work they work, if not oh well its a game.
Some losers(me) are on pace to drop $100 a season into this game, as a business you either fix what your customer base has identified is broken or you lose taht customer base. GLB2 doesn't really seem like it is growing like GLB1 was at this stage so each customer/Agent is pretty important.
mutleyddmc DTD
offline
offline
Originally posted by Parab00n
Some losers(me) are on pace to drop $100 a season into this game, as a business you either fix what your customer base has identified is broken or you lose taht customer base. GLB2 doesn't really seem like it is growing like GLB1 was at this stage so each customer/Agent is pretty important.
I agree entirely, my point is I've given up. Corndog has said in some way or another that its being looked at, he hasn't said a time scale and I am bored of going back and forth about it. It's obvious and he's pretty much said it, that when people are like this Corndog doesn't really answer.
So if we just end the discussion, ask him one nice question maybe he will tell us and that will be the end of it
so Mr Corndog have you a rough timescale on when this is being fixed. This season or is it an offseason change?
Some losers(me) are on pace to drop $100 a season into this game, as a business you either fix what your customer base has identified is broken or you lose taht customer base. GLB2 doesn't really seem like it is growing like GLB1 was at this stage so each customer/Agent is pretty important.
I agree entirely, my point is I've given up. Corndog has said in some way or another that its being looked at, he hasn't said a time scale and I am bored of going back and forth about it. It's obvious and he's pretty much said it, that when people are like this Corndog doesn't really answer.
So if we just end the discussion, ask him one nice question maybe he will tell us and that will be the end of it
so Mr Corndog have you a rough timescale on when this is being fixed. This season or is it an offseason change?
william78
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
No, yes, yes.
That part is obvious. The when and how is not.
If that's the case I'm fine with it. Though the way I've read Corndog's responses has been that he doesn't think its OP. If it was working as intended we'd have to field teams built around that play (offense and defense) which I guess I could do... just wouldn't find exciting enough.
Never have asked for the play to be "nerfed" in the traditional sense of the meaning, just want either better options or better pathing. Simply saying we are studying the issue and will look at making improvements to the sim in this regard would be have all I'm looking for. The way I've read his comments is that he doesn't consider it an issue.
No, yes, yes.
That part is obvious. The when and how is not.
If that's the case I'm fine with it. Though the way I've read Corndog's responses has been that he doesn't think its OP. If it was working as intended we'd have to field teams built around that play (offense and defense) which I guess I could do... just wouldn't find exciting enough.
Never have asked for the play to be "nerfed" in the traditional sense of the meaning, just want either better options or better pathing. Simply saying we are studying the issue and will look at making improvements to the sim in this regard would be have all I'm looking for. The way I've read his comments is that he doesn't consider it an issue.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
