Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Narasimha
you're right, they should make OL 100FP, cause it's 100 on glb, and look how hard it is finding them over there, 50 is ok with me, what's the real reason you're bitching about this?

This is also the heart of the other side of his argument, too - GLB1 having WRs as a top tier position made them too expensive and created shortages of good ones during a few seasons. So they're cheaper over here, and the only place to put them is in the tier with fullbacks, TEs, and defenders. It's less of a "fullbacks shouldn't be 100 fp tier" argument and more of a "WRs should be 150", though I don't think he realizes that's his point.

Also -
Originally posted by James1985
Originally posted by pottsman
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/59934The team he is on runs a lot and they are 4-0
She. #1 rookie team at the moment, thanks to her lead blocking for our nice pair of halfbacks.

A good fullback is absolutely valuable in this sim. Any play where the FB and/or TE get a pancake relatively early on an outside pitch it's GG, Touchdown. If they're blocking 3-4 guys between the two of them, good luck finding effective plays to deal with that on strong side pitches. Straight up, either the defenders are built to survive solid FB/TE run blocking, or they aren't. If they aren't, you're gonna struggle with run heavy teams.

And to think, nobody's got 3 star pancake chef yet. It's certainly gonna get nastier.

Originally posted by pottsman

She. #1 rookie team at the moment, thanks to her lead blocking for our nice pair of halfbacks.

Yea, i was being sarcastic, the price on GLB2 is fine.

Originally posted by Narasimha
you're right, they should make OL 100FP, cause it's 100 on glb, and look how hard it is finding them over there, 50 is ok with me, what's the real reason you're ****ing about this?

I wasn't making the case that linemen should be 100FP, I'm fine with the price of 50FP.

I was saying that when it comes down to superstar's, I won't be chosing to make a superstar FB over a superstar WR/CB/S/DE/TE.

I'd rather decide between making a superstar FB over the other 50FP tier players, such as OL/DT/K/P. I feel like a FB would have blended in nicely with those positions.

But hey, like I said I'm the only person that feels this way so let's just drop it.

I dont see the point in putting FBs and TEs in different price sections...

From a non-GLB look, I think everyone agrees, that WR get more spotlight than FBs. But from a GLB standpoint, I think watching a FB is at least as fun as watching a WR. Additionally, if you put in the experienced shortage of some positions in GLB1 I think the prices seem to be just fine...

Originally posted by pottsman

She. #1 rookie team at the moment, thanks to her lead blocking for our nice pair of halfbacks.

No. Number 1 rookie team because Yorick's got screwed by having to play a very good sophomore team in a ladder game. A sophomore team that is now 5-0.

Against other rookies, not only is Yorick's 4-0, but three of those wins were shutouts.

p.s. But on the subject of HB's, ya, we have a pair of stud blocking/sprinting HB's as well as an awesomesauce blocking FB.

Originally posted by chronic23
I wasn't making the case that linemen should be 100FP, I'm fine with the price of 50FP.

I was saying that when it comes down to superstar's, I won't be chosing to make a superstar FB over a superstar WR/CB/S/DE/TE.

I'd rather decide between making a superstar FB over the other 50FP tier players, such as OL/DT/K/P. I feel like a FB would have blended in nicely with those positions.

But hey, like I said I'm the only person that feels this way so let's just drop it.

Yeah I wasn't being serious either.

Originally posted by chronic23


I was saying that when it comes down to superstar's, I won't be chosing to make a superstar FB over a superstar WR/CB/S/DE/TE.

Probs because you know nothing.

Originally posted by Jampy2.0
Probs because you know nothing.

That's cool