Warrior General Games

I'll build a S* HB, a BTE, a BFB, back-up HB/Returner, and 3 O-line players for the right team looking to do a rookie rebuild.

I'm not looking for people who have never owned or run a GLB2 team, because I only get one shot at the S* HB.

People who have S* O-line players lined up would get preferential treatment.

No rushing QBs, no more than 1 back-up HB, no rushing FBs.

Blocking WRs not required, but no penalty.

Speed WRs should be kept to a minimum, as you are planning on using WRs in conjunction with the running game to pick up short/medium yardage in order to keep defences honest.

If I don't find the right team, I'll just hold off on making the bots until S4.

Well, I could ofer a lot of that. But we do have a Running QB.

AGD2D Youth coming with a strong running attack similar to AGD2D.

Gonna chat u

Originally posted by shield.bearer
Well, I could ofer a lot of that. But we do have a Running QB.

Yeah, I don't buy the rushing QB idea. You can't have a passing QB and a rushing QB in this game. I don't mind a passing QB that is able to pull the ball down and scramble for some yards (though that is a lot more rare in the current blitz sim), but a QB that can put the ball on a target is essential to preventing people from keying in a 100% run stopping gameplan.

Originally posted by shield.bearer
Well, I could ofer a lot of that. But we do have a Running QB.

Like he said, we can offer almost everything you want, except the use of a rushing QB. We don't have both passing and rushing however, and the WRs will be all blocking if that helps.

I don't plan on rushing the QB an enormous amount of time like some teams with him, just want to sprinkle him in there.

If you change your mind the D'Haran empire would love to have your S* HB, Bte and Bfb

He is saying the fact that you have a rushing QB is a turnoff because it is obvious to teams playing you that you're only going to run, and it takes away the threat of passing to further legitimize your run game.

Originally posted by HayRow
Like he said, we can offer almost everything you want, except the use of a rushing QB. We don't have both passing and rushing however, and the WRs will be all blocking if that helps.

I don't plan on rushing the QB an enormous amount of time like some teams with him, just want to sprinkle him in there.

If you change your mind the D'Haran empire would love to have your S* HB, Bte and Bfb

Yeah, the reason I don't want to be on a gimmick rushing team is that teams will know that they don't need to key in on the passing game at all.

WRs have a tough enough time catching the ball when they are dedicated possession builds, if you are playing a team with an rQB and BWRs, you can actually get away with not covering the WRs at all... cover 1 all blitz or even just a GLB.

Originally posted by Jampy2.0
He is saying the fact that you have a rushing QB is a turnoff because it is obvious to teams playing you that you're only going to run, and it takes away the threat of passing to further legitimize your run game.



We get that

Originally posted by Time Trial
Yeah, the reason I don't want to be on a gimmick rushing team is that teams will know that they don't need to key in on the passing game at all.

WRs have a tough enough time catching the ball when they are dedicated possession builds, if you are playing a team with an rQB and BWRs, you can actually get away with not covering the WRs at all... cover 1 all blitz or even just a GLB.

Yeah I feel ya. Obviously going to roll with the premise that our pure run blocking builds are going to overmatch the defense no matter the def alignment.

Totally understand tho, and goodluck to ya