Warrior General Games

3-4 Cover 1 LILB Lurk vs Singleback
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/26115/2020463

New man coverage logic enabled.

WR1 is double covered by CB1 and RILB leaving no coverage on the TE.

Coverage seems to be as expected according to the hash posted at http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum/thread/5153835?page=2#48162356

i.e.

CB1 => WR1
CB2 => WR2
SS => WR3
ROLB => HB
RILB => WR1

And no one on the TE.

Sure it was enabled? Seems it should work correctly.

Lemme set it up on my devbox

I'm tired, for some reason I read BTE. Yeah, it looks like the RILB won't cover the TE with the current code.

Yeah I'm sure it was enabled. Here's a quarter over smoke play from the same game: http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/26115/2020581

I've been wondering if it would be better to have the LBs with higher priority than the safeties, since the safeties are more flexible.

Though then you'd get OLBs covering an uncovered WR before the FS/SS, and I'm not sure if that is desired. Or maybe it would be.

It may or may not be desired depending on the players on the team. In this situation I'd want the ILB covering the HB, and I'd probably prefer the SS on the WR3 and the OLB on the TE.

Most real world defenses would keep the SS on the strong side covering the TE and the ROLB would slide out to cover the slot.

Either way DCs will have to be careful of matchups when they go with a 3-4 against a 3WR formation.