Warrior General Games

I've found plays in certain sections of my playbook that had a play priority of 5 being ran less than plays that had a priority of 2 or 3 in the same section. I don't get it. The little red question mark says plays with a lower priority will be ran less than plays with a higher priority. Is it the greater the number of boxes in the play priority bar, the less the play's priority? Otherwise, I'm confused.

There is more than the bars to getting your play called.

Originally posted by Jampy2.0
There is more than the bars to getting your play called.

Are you Bort's douchebag multi?

Pretty sure I would have been banned for being as big a dick as you are daily.

Originally posted by shield.bearer
Are you Bort's douchebag multi?

Pretty sure I would have been banned for being as big a dick as you are daily.

He has been forum banned like twice

You need to get caught blatantly gaming the system to get permabanned

Originally posted by Jampy2.0
There is more than the bars to getting your play called.

Good to see you still overestimate your intelligence.

"plays in certain sections of my playbook" was the indicator that I'm aware of how the sections correspond to in-game situations provided in Tactics as opposed to blatant stupidity that crossed your mind.

Originally posted by Jampy2.0
There is more than the bars to getting your play called.

Please keep responses in the FAQ forum constructive.

Originally posted by Jampy2.0
There is more than the bars to getting your play called.

He's right though.

For instance, the OP never said "When I'm up against 3WR plays" or "When I'm up against 3WR plays and am trying to call a play flagged as Medium Run" or "I'm calling 100% blitz and my non-blitzing plays..." or "My zone plays aren't being called despite the fact that I have 0% zone calls for most situations in my tactics".

OP would need to provide a lot more information about which plays and what his tactics call for.

Originally posted by Time Trial
He's right though.

For instance, the OP never said "When I'm up against 3WR plays" or "When I'm up against 3WR plays and am trying to call a play flagged as Medium Run" or "I'm calling 100% blitz and my non-blitzing plays..." or "My zone plays aren't being called despite the fact that I have 0% zone calls for most situations in my tactics".

OP would need to provide a lot more information about which plays and what his tactics call for.

right, and Jampy could have just said that instead of choosing to be unproductive
it isn't Jampy's job to answer peoples questions in a not snide insulting way, but it at least makes sense that people dont like his responses and tell him he should be less of a jerk
but he has also gotten a lot better lately
and being a jerk back to him is also unproductive

Yeah, he ought to have said some of the things that the OP needed to say, but then again, so should one of the other three people who posted before I did.

Originally posted by Time Trial
Yeah, he ought to have said some of the things that the OP needed to say, but then again, so should one of the other three people who posted before I did.

i completely agree with this

Originally posted by shield.bearer
Are you Bort's douchebag multi?

Pretty sure I would have been banned for being as big a dick as you are daily.

No you guys are just idiots.

Originally posted by AirMcMVP
Please keep responses in the FAQ forum constructive.

It was constructive, If the OP wants to learn how to get his plays called more often that is what he should ask.
he came in with a prior knowledge that is incorrect, and his idiotic and shitty attitude is 100% why he can't even get his plays called.

Originally posted by AirMcMVP
Please keep responses in the FAQ forum constructive.

It's more constructive than the responses he got from that post. How about you guys spread the wealth and get after the people wasting everyone else's time posting questions they can find themselves with a little effort? Why do the lazy ones deserve to be babied?