User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > FAQ's, Player Guides and Game Help > Low Contract Chemistry Question
Page:
 
Jampy2.0
thuggin'
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Jampy2.0
Not sure if you're mad cuz you're a bad coach or because you are too dumb to realize that none of your players need to have low contracts, so why even bother?


Op + 3 multis? or corpses of ded bodies lol

y r u so mad OP? Just don't use low contracts problem solved,
should be spending your time on more important things, not trying to understand low contracts lol.... This is why I hate people.
 
DONKEIDIC
pinto
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Homage
It actually doesn't state an incorrect fact.

The statement is factual. It just doesn't mention anything about how quickly one gets to said max of 50.


See there, at least this is somewhat productive.

How do you know for sure it is factual? Hence the asking for clarification in the FAQ section. It could very well be a lie by omission, or a continuing misrepresentation. This occurs when an important fact is left out in order to foster a misconception.

Also, by being put there to define a low contract it is lying by not completing the definition. If that is representing the full definition, then yes, it is a lie by the fact that it is not the full definition.

At the very least a post like "it was meant to be vague" would be fine.
Edited by DONKEIDIC on Feb 4, 2014 10:20:32
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
If you change your contract from Low to Medium does it give you some chemistry points back?
 
o The Boss x
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
If you change your contract from Low to Medium does it give you some chemistry points back?


Immediately? No. It will regenerate to 100 (if not already there) faster though.
 
-Phaytle-
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by DONKEIDIC
AGAIN YOU FUCKING MONGOLOID IF MY PLAYERS HAD NO LOW CONTRACTS HOW COULD I SEE THE EFFECTS DUMBFUCK?


Again, are you a lazy or blind coach? I had no low contracts either, but somehow I found out the effect of low and high contracts. Now you just made it apparent you didn't even graduate from whatever school the short bus took you to.

And I'm the dumbfuck? It looks like you're mad because answers ascertainable by simple observation are too difficult for you to grasp without your special school aide by your side.
Edited by -Phaytle- on Feb 4, 2014 15:57:08
Edited by -Phaytle- on Feb 4, 2014 15:54:16
 
TxSteve
Not A Mod
offline
Link
 
random insertion in a random thread.

I've found it interesting that it appears (to me) that players who perform better are getting slightly more chemistry gain (say 7 vs 5) anyone else seeing that (high contracts)
 
-Phaytle-
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by TxSteve
random insertion in a random thread.

I've found it interesting that it appears (to me) that players who perform better are getting slightly more chemistry gain (say 7 vs 5) anyone else seeing that (high contracts)


I thought this was happening a bit last season, but it wasn't consistent enough for me to count on. This season, from my own player I know this is not true. He hasn't been getting near as many stats as lat season but is till gaining one or two more chem each game than others with the same contract. However, I am beginning to see a correlation between snap count and chem gain. As in players at the same position with the same contract getting one or two chem less if they play less snaps than someone at the same position. But again, this may just be random and I have not kept track of it closely enough for it to be anything close to a definitive conclusion.
 
DONKEIDIC
pinto
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by -Phaytle-
Again, are you a lazy or blind coach? I had no low contracts either, but somehow I found out the effect of low and high contracts. Now you just made it apparent you didn't even graduate from whatever school the short bus took you to.

And I'm the dumbfuck? It looks like you're mad because answers ascertainable by simple observation are too difficult for you to grasp without your special school aide by your side.



I guess if you have only two things to look at, you will learn everything about two things:

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/17510

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/team/175

I am working on learning the entire game front to back. It is a bit more work than you might be accustomed to.

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/home/56221
 
-Phaytle-
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by DONKEIDIC

I guess if you have only two things to look at, you will learn everything about two things:

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/17510

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/team/175

I am working on learning the entire game front to back. It is a bit more work than you might be accustomed to.

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/home/56221


This has no relevance. If anything, you should know more than me with all that opportunity for first hand experience from multiple players and teams to look at and experiment with.

Sadly, with all those opportunities you have to succeed, the only one I have to learn from is doing much better than all of yours. I'm doing a good job as GM/OC/DC/builder for one team. You are spreading your suck to multiple teams and players. I might suggest you just stick with a handful of dots and learn the basics at your pace. Maybe in a couple years you might be able to know what to do with all those players and teams.

And it's sad when people bring up how many players or teams you have or manage. That's nice you currently spend more money on this game, doesn't mean shit towards your ability. I could have a whole team of dots myself tomorrow if I felt like, but at this time I enjoy trying to get 15 random guys to work together tow in games.

 
DONKEIDIC
pinto
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by -Phaytle-
This has no relevance. If anything, you should know more than me with all that opportunity for first hand experience from multiple players and teams to look at and experiment with.

Sadly, with all those opportunities you have to succeed, the only one I have to learn from is doing much better than all of yours. I'm doing a good job as GM/OC/DC/builder for one team. You are spreading your suck to multiple teams and players. I might suggest you just stick with a handful of dots and learn the basics at your pace. Maybe in a couple years you might be able to know what to do with all those players and teams.

And it's sad when people bring up how many players or teams you have or manage. That's nice you currently spend more money on this game, doesn't mean shit towards your ability. I could have a whole team of dots myself tomorrow if I felt like, but at this time I enjoy trying to get 15 random guys to work together tow in games.



Glad you feel better, now contribute to the thread or GTFO.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.