heh
i just realized that i did all that math for a well reasoned argument and forgot to even mention that those numbers are before keeping in mind that the more agressive offense should accrue more sacks and without the information on how many more i cant do the math here but more sacks = fewer sustained drives in the general case so that would skew the sustained drives stats farther to short passing
i just realized that i did all that math for a well reasoned argument and forgot to even mention that those numbers are before keeping in mind that the more agressive offense should accrue more sacks and without the information on how many more i cant do the math here but more sacks = fewer sustained drives in the general case so that would skew the sustained drives stats farther to short passing






























