I think some people are also forgetting all these instances where it says "X player couldn,t catch the ball due to nearby defense".
Edited by issacar on Jan 3, 2014 13:30:47
Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > Bort, Please Fix RBs
issacar
offline
offline
Originally posted by suske127
So how about dem' Running BAcks
I have 2 fairly succesful RBs thank you.
So how about dem' Running BAcks
I have 2 fairly succesful RBs thank you.
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/league/10
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/9099
HB currently leader in the league MVP race.
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/9099
HB currently leader in the league MVP race.
jdbolick
offline
offline
Originally posted by issacar
I think some people are also forgetting all these instances where it says "X player couldn,t catch the ball due to nearby defense".
Oh yeah, that will get people excited about playing GLB2.
I think some people are also forgetting all these instances where it says "X player couldn,t catch the ball due to nearby defense".
Oh yeah, that will get people excited about playing GLB2.
Homage
offline
offline
Originally posted by jdbolick
Oh yeah, that will get people excited about playing GLB2.
for someone who is all about touting built teams... you certainly bitch a lot about individual stats.
Oh yeah, that will get people excited about playing GLB2.
for someone who is all about touting built teams... you certainly bitch a lot about individual stats.
issacar
offline
offline
Originally posted by jdbolick
Oh yeah, that will get people excited about playing GLB2.
It's not a sexy stat, but
Originally posted by Homage
for someone who is all about touting built teams... you certainly bitch a lot about individual stats.
I could be wrong, but I think that those instances will turn into pass deflections more frequently over time. Maybe the CB is flailing his arms like a full retard (bad attributes) and the WR has brick hands (bad attributes) so the game engine says the defense did something good enough to disrupt the sucky sucky pass from being made without crediting anyone.
I think I'm seeing more occurrences of pass deflections then in the first games of the season, but it's kinda hard to tell since the difference doesn't seem that big...
Oh yeah, that will get people excited about playing GLB2.
It's not a sexy stat, but
Originally posted by Homage
for someone who is all about touting built teams... you certainly bitch a lot about individual stats.
I could be wrong, but I think that those instances will turn into pass deflections more frequently over time. Maybe the CB is flailing his arms like a full retard (bad attributes) and the WR has brick hands (bad attributes) so the game engine says the defense did something good enough to disrupt the sucky sucky pass from being made without crediting anyone.
I think I'm seeing more occurrences of pass deflections then in the first games of the season, but it's kinda hard to tell since the difference doesn't seem that big...
Edited by issacar on Jan 3, 2014 21:27:31
jdbolick
offline
offline
Originally posted by Homage
for someone who is all about touting built teams... you certainly bitch a lot about individual stats.
#1) No idea what the first part of your sentence is about.
#2) If an aspect of the game is completely broken, that's a bad thing. It appears there is no reason whatsoever to build players for PDs.
for someone who is all about touting built teams... you certainly bitch a lot about individual stats.
#1) No idea what the first part of your sentence is about.
#2) If an aspect of the game is completely broken, that's a bad thing. It appears there is no reason whatsoever to build players for PDs.
Homage
offline
offline
Originally posted by jdbolick
#1) No idea what the first part of your sentence is about.
#2) If an aspect of the game is completely broken, that's a bad thing. It appears there is no reason whatsoever to build players for PDs.
1) oh u
2) of all people, you should understand player development. Do you really want a ton of PD's in the first season? Quit being ridiculous. And srsly... did you ever think for a moment you could be completely wrong in how you're building?
#1) No idea what the first part of your sentence is about.
#2) If an aspect of the game is completely broken, that's a bad thing. It appears there is no reason whatsoever to build players for PDs.
1) oh u
2) of all people, you should understand player development. Do you really want a ton of PD's in the first season? Quit being ridiculous. And srsly... did you ever think for a moment you could be completely wrong in how you're building?
Originally posted by Homage
1) oh u
2) of all people, you should understand player development. Do you really want a ton of PD's in the first season? Quit being ridiculous. And srsly... did you ever think for a moment you could be completely wrong in how you're building?
LOL. yeah right. like he will ever admit that he is wrong in anyway. i like JD but i dont think that i have ever seen him admit that he is wrong.
1) oh u
2) of all people, you should understand player development. Do you really want a ton of PD's in the first season? Quit being ridiculous. And srsly... did you ever think for a moment you could be completely wrong in how you're building?
LOL. yeah right. like he will ever admit that he is wrong in anyway. i like JD but i dont think that i have ever seen him admit that he is wrong.
Originally posted by ProfessionalKop
LOL. yeah right. like he will ever admit that he is wrong in anyway. i like JD but i dont think that i have ever seen him admit that he is wrong.
it happened once. its a sticky in some forum.
LOL. yeah right. like he will ever admit that he is wrong in anyway. i like JD but i dont think that i have ever seen him admit that he is wrong.
it happened once. its a sticky in some forum.
Originally posted by foshizzel17
it happened once. its a sticky in some forum.
youre a liar.
it happened once. its a sticky in some forum.
youre a liar.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
