User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Pro Leagues > They keys to winning games in WL.
Page:
 
fast420
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick
Blocking isn't the problem, as 5WR yields fewer sacks than Singleback or Shotgun. The issue is that most teams don't bother with enough WRs to use it regularly.


well i don't particularly like shotgun either. too much pressure, hurries, bad throws and sacks that end up in stalled drives or losses of yards in either of those formations. i like to move my O forward, not backward. and the blocking still sucks regardless.
 
Time Trial
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
im still interested in running a 5WR offense since everyone seems to be chicken. I'll probs have to wait till SF gets to pro level tho.


I'm not running 8-bit right now, you are free to play around with that team if you want.
 
detroitdad
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
What is a true pure running offense? One that gives up 3rd and medium/long?


http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?team_id=2875
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick
Blocking isn't the problem, as 5WR yields fewer sacks than Singleback or Shotgun. The issue is that most teams don't bother with enough WRs to use it regularly.


wat? Most teams in this league have 5 WR's and barely use it at all. Hell you have 5 WR's and NEVER use the formation at all.
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Time Trial
I'm not running 8-bit right now, you are free to play around with that team if you want.


hmm maybe
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
wat? Most teams in this league have 5 WR's and barely use it at all. Hell you have 5 WR's and NEVER use the formation at all.

Why do you think teams carry 7-8 CBs? The more times you have 4+ on the field, the more their energy drains. Try running a 5 wide offense with only 5 WRs and your energy will be in the tank before the end of the 1st quarter.

edit:
I think NBA Jam had 8 WRs back when they were passing all day.
Edited by jdbolick on Nov 26, 2013 18:16:14
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick

Why do you think teams carry 7-8 CBs? The more times you have 4+ on the field, the more their energy drains. Try running a 5 wide offense with only 5 WRs and your energy will be in the tank before the end of the 1st quarter.


I am not talking about a 5 WR offense. I am talking about sparingly using 5 WR. If the plays worked as well as you claim you wouldn't shy away from using them at all. Don't give me baloney about how many WR's people carry when we are talking a couple plays a game. If 5 WR was actually better at blocking than shotgun and single back it would be used over single back and shotgun preferably in situations passing deep. But people don't use it for those situations because realistically the blocking sucks for it. That might not mean ultimately the sack fest it used to be but it still is pretty unreliable and certainly not preferable.
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
I am not talking about a 5 WR offense.

Originally posted by bhall43
im still interested in running a 5WR offense since everyone seems to be chicken. I'll probs have to wait till SF gets to pro level tho.

Originally posted by bhall43
Originally posted by T2
I've been seeing more and more 5WR lately. This game could really use a great spread offense.

Ya very sparingly though. Thought about switching BEEF over to an offense like that this offseason but would involved too many changes in a weak FA market.

 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
Hell you have 5 WR's and NEVER use the formation at all.


 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
The reason I want to run it is to show you how fail it is.
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
The reason I want to run it is to show you how fail it is.

As opposed to the stats showing that it is very effective in limited use every season for a while now? I don't run it because one of my WRs is a STOP, another is a 2 AEQ build with 50 equipment points that's on my team because I like the agent, and a third only has 53 equipment points.
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick

As opposed to the stats showing that it is very effective in limited use every season for a while now?


I don't believe it will be very effective at all but I am willing to make the plunge to find out.
 
foshizzel17
my drizzt
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
Originally posted by jdbolick


As opposed to the stats showing that it is very effective in limited use every season for a while now?


I don't believe it will be very effective at all but I am willing to make the plunge to find out.


way to keep it positive




................
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.