User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Pee Wee Leagues > Pee Wee Gold League > Round 1 - PWG Playoff Ranking
Page:
 
Nif
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Kelts
Like I said. We've all been in PW at least 10 seasons if not more. You called our success limited and I'm running my mouth. I never said a word to anyone besides jampy or ahrens. So for you to statement of " I think I'm a pimp" Is uncalled for. I'll leave it at that.




you suggested I was butthurt and pissed off before then... i'll leave it at that
Edited by Nif on Sep 2, 2013 02:28:24
 
Kelts
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Nif


you suggested I was butthurt and pissed off before then... i'll leave it at that


Yea you were being an asshole. I called you out. You lost 3 time to us this season. Sry.
 
Nif
offline
Link
 
yeah I am assholish at times
 
Kelts
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Nif
yeah I am assholish at times


Me too. Like I said before I never had any issue with you until the cocks thing.
 
Jackson55555
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Oakdad
Are you sure it doesn't matter I mean the facts are a bit against you.

Here are the top 10 teams in terms if effective builds

Rank... Players... Age... Level... Value... Eff Level... Salary... Team...
1 ... 55 ... 38 ... 15 ... 349.60 ... 18 ... $4,301,000 ... All Pro Falcons
2 ... 55 ... 38 ... 15 ... 348.42 ... 17 ... $4,160,000 ... Whodey's Experiment
3 ... 55 ... 38 ... 15 ... 347.73 ... 17 ... $5,112,000 ... Hired Guns
4 ... 55 ... 38 ... 15 ... 347.63 ... 17 ... $3,960,000 ... Sir Flumps
5 ... 55 ... 38 ... 15 ... 342.89 ... 17 ... $4,400,000 ... Short Bus Window Lickers
6 ... 54 ... 38 ... 15 ... 342.63 ... 17 ... $3,421,480 ... TazVikes Nordica
7 ... 55 ... 38 ... 15 ... 342.25 ... 17 ... $3,620,000 ... Minnesota Vikingz
8 ... 55 ... 38 ... 15 ... 339.80 ... 16 ... $3,499,680 ... Fighting Gamecocks
9 ... 55 ... 38 ... 15 ... 339.74 ... 17 ... $3,499,680 ... Gold Test Squad
10 ... 55 ... 38 ... 15 ... 339.51 ... 16 ... $5,500,000 ... Chicago 85' Bears

Now lets look at the last 8 teams left in the plays offs.

Short Bus - 5th above
Hired Guns - 3rd above
Bears - 10th
Royal Cocks - Only team listed above
Fighting Cocks - 8th
Taz Vikes - 6th
Whodey's - 2nd
All Pro Falcons - 1st

And the 2 teams in the final are ranked 1st and 3rd in effective levels.


EL doesn't always mean success. Gerr and jkid, unless my memory sucks, never had the highest EL's and each won Gold a couple of times. Jkid especially would have 15/16, 15/17 dots and would do well. If I had trained + traded in BT's to that point of you posting this, I'd be at 350 prob and I lost 1st round. I just prefer getting (stick to CB) jumping/strength/tackling up to 25+ rather than roll agility/vision over once or twice. Agreed with whodey/Nif, although it looks like their argument is being overlooked.
 
Link
 
Day 40 ELs -

01 55 40 16 363.23 19 $4,301,000...All Pro Falcons
02 55 40 16 359.33 18 $4,160,000...Whodey's Experiment
03 55 40 16 358.31 18 $5,112,000...Hired Guns
04 55 40 16 357.81 18 $3,960,000...Sir Flumps
05 55 40 16 353.03 18 $4,400,000...Short Bus Window Lickers
06 54 40 16 352.64 18 $3,421,480...TazVikes Nordica
07 55 40 16 351.92 18 $3,620,000...Minnesota Vikingz
08 55 40 16 350.77 18 $5,500,000...Chicago 85' Bears
09 55 40 16 350.50 18 $3,499,680...Gold Test Squad
10 55 40 16 350.19 18 $3,499,680...Fighting Gamecocks
11 53 40 16 349.26 17 $1,707,960...The Citadel Bulldogs
12 55 40 14 345.35 17 $5,697,800...Royal Cocks
13 01 40 16 341.15 17 $1,120,680...Lincoln City Seals
14 55 40 16 340.25 16 $3,520,000...NOLA Kangaroos
15 55 40 16 338.94 17 $3,500,000...Corrupted Mayors

As for my two cents on the subject....effective level =/= effective build. The two can coincide, but they don't necessarily have to.
 
*Birdman*
offline
Link
 
EF is a good indicator of a strong team but doesn't mean that much. Just look at the EF of Requiem at 336, Subversive at 330 and us at 322. None make the top 15 but all 3 teams can play very close with any team in the league.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.