Yes, those bars mean next to nothing. They don't take into account SA's, equipment, and its the average between all players on the team. So if you have say a level 20 DT, level 22 NT, level 15 DT, and a level 16 DT, it will look bad on the ratings compared with just a 22 DT and a 19 NT
Blutoski
offline
offline
Originally posted by islanders1986
Originally posted by Blutoski
I find the power bars a bit distracting. It penalizes teams for depth.
Do you mean the overall rating?
And I looked at plenty of different factors in coming up with this such as win/loss record, quality of wins, quality of losses, points scored, (didnt really look at pointas against that much because sometimes teams place their scrub d when they get up big), overall rating. I also took into account how some teams did last year in relations to others when I was comparing two teams that were both here last year.
Yeah, like I posted above your rankings seem pretty spot on. The example above clearly indicates the problem I have with the power bars though.
Originally posted by Blutoski
I find the power bars a bit distracting. It penalizes teams for depth.
Do you mean the overall rating?
And I looked at plenty of different factors in coming up with this such as win/loss record, quality of wins, quality of losses, points scored, (didnt really look at pointas against that much because sometimes teams place their scrub d when they get up big), overall rating. I also took into account how some teams did last year in relations to others when I was comparing two teams that were both here last year.
Yeah, like I posted above your rankings seem pretty spot on. The example above clearly indicates the problem I have with the power bars though.
Cedo
offline
offline
I use this only for basic info... not really accurate and usefull.
Just the overall with a +6 overall you can give up hope
(experience speaking!)
Just the overall with a +6 overall you can give up hope
(experience speaking!)Menamino
offline
offline
Here's a little thing I've thought about doing for a while, the team rankings in some important offensive and defensive stats. Now that we're 7 games in we can start to see some true rankings for the league. It's easy enough to find, so it's also easy to make on my own, so I figured I'd put it all in one place every week for people to view it easily. I'll put it in the zeta power ranking threads. Should give a better idea about some teams' true strengths.
OFFENSE
PASSING
1. London Hitmen - 1783
2. Dublin Dragoons - 1574
3. Birmingham Cardinals - 1510
4. Aarhus Stingers - 1502
5. Live Oak Eagles - 1432
6. Berlin Ballers - 1354
7. Paris Colonels - 1307
8. Mobile Alabama Leprechauns - 1235
9. Stockholm Syndrome - 1196
10. Inverness Highlanders - 1180
11. Frankfurt Universe - 1167
12. Bushy Park Badgers - 1157
13. Bordeaux Carlin - 1103
14. Barcelona Bandits - 905
15. Nuremberg Nightknights - 871
16. Cedar Creek Wildcats - 460
RUSHING
1. Birmingham Cardinals - 1594
2. London Hitmen - 1442
3. Berlin Ballers - 1323
4. Aarhus Stingers - 1218
5. Inverness Highlanders - 901
6. Live Oak Eagles - 824
7. Dublin Dragoons - 708
8. Stockholm Syndrome - 626
9. Paris Colonels - 470
10. Nuremberg Nightknights - 460
11. Mobile Alabama Leprechauns - 442
12. Frankfurt Universe - 268
13. Bordeaux Carlin - 236
14. Barcelona Bandits - 188
15. Bushy Park Badgers - 0
16. Cedar Creek Wildcats - -147.5
TOTAL TOUCHDOWNS FOR
1. London Hitmen - 39
2. Birmingham Cardinals - 34
3. Berlin Ballers - 26
3. Aarhus Stingers - 26
5. Inverness Highlanders - 20
6. Dublin Dragoons - 16
7. Live Oak Eagles - 12
8. Paris Colonels - 11
9. Stockholm Syndrome - 11
10. Mobile Alabama Leprechauns - 9
11. Nuremberg Nightknights - 6
12. Frankfurt Universe - 5
13. Bushy Park Badgers - 3
14. Barcelona Bandits - 2
15. Bordeaux Carlin - 1
16. Cedar Creek Wildcats - 0
DEFENSE
Passing Yards Allowed
1. Berlin Ballers - 612
2. London Hitmen - 761
3. Birmingham Cardinals - 797
4. Live Oak Eagles - 1108
5. Mobile Alabama Leprechauns - 1201
6. Aarhus Stingers - 1204
7. Dublin Dragoons - 1218
8. Inverness Highlanders - 1291
9. Bordeaux Carlin - 1307
10. Bushy Park Badgers - 1333
11. Paris Colonels - 1343
12. Nuremberg Nightknights - 1346
13. Stockholm Syndrome - 1379
14. Barcelona Bandits - 1567
15. Cedar Creek Wildcats - 1615
16. Frankfurt Universe - 1653
Rushing Yards Allowed
1. Berlin Ballers - -137
2. London Hitmen - -70
3. Birmingham Cardinals - 13
4. Aarhus Stingers - 97
5. Inverness Highlanders - 255
6. Live Oak Eagles - 295
7. Stockholm Syndrome - 477
8. Dublin Dragoons - 589
9. Paris Colonels - 602
10. Mobile Alabama Leprechauns - 685
11. Nuremberg Nightknights - 925
12. Frankfurt Universe - 985
13. Bordeaux Carlin - 1082
14. Bushy Park Badgers - 1176
15. Barcelona Bandits - 1191
16. Cedar Creek Wildcats - 2389
Sacks For
1. Berlin Ballers - 38
2. Birmingham Cardinals - 21
3. London Hitmen - 17
4. Aarhus Stingers - 12
5. Live Oak Eagles - 8
6. Inverness Highlanders - 7
6. Mobile Alabama Leprechauns - 7
8. Dublin Dragoons - 5
9. Bordeaux Carlin - 4
10. Barcelona Bandits - 3
10. Paris Colonels - 3
12. Frankfurt Universe - 2
12. Nuremberg Nightknights - 2
12. Stockholm Syndrome - 2
15. Cedar Creek Wildcats - 1
16. Bushy Park Badgers - 0
Interceptions For
1. Berlin Ballers - 23
2. Stockholm Syndrome - 18
3. Aarhus Stingers - 16
3. London Hitmen - 16
5. Birmingham Cardinals - 11
6. Barcelona Bandits - 10
6. Dublin Dragoons - 10
6. Live Oak Eagles - 10
9. Inverness Highlanders - 9
10. Paris Colonels - 8
11. Mobile Alabama Leprechauns - 6
12. Bordeaux Carlin - 5
12. Bushy Park Badgers - 5
12. Nuremberg Nightknights - 5
15. Cedar Creek Wildcats - 2
16. Frankfurt Universe - 0
Total Touchdowns Allowed
1. Berlin Ballers - 0
2. London Hitmen - 1
2. Birmingham Cardinals - 1
4. Aarhus Stingers - 3
5. Inverness Highlanders - 4
6. Stockholm Syndrome - 6
7. Paris Colonels - 8
8. Live Oak Eagles - 9
9. Dublin Dragoons - 10
10. Mobile Alabama Leprechauns - 14
11. Bordeaux Carlin - 15
12. Nuremberg Nightknights - 17
13. Bushy Park Badgers - 18
14. Frankfurt Universe - 22
15. Barcelona Bandits - 28
16. Cedar Creek Wildcats - 65
OFFENSE
PASSING
1. London Hitmen - 1783
2. Dublin Dragoons - 1574
3. Birmingham Cardinals - 1510
4. Aarhus Stingers - 1502
5. Live Oak Eagles - 1432
6. Berlin Ballers - 1354
7. Paris Colonels - 1307
8. Mobile Alabama Leprechauns - 1235
9. Stockholm Syndrome - 1196
10. Inverness Highlanders - 1180
11. Frankfurt Universe - 1167
12. Bushy Park Badgers - 1157
13. Bordeaux Carlin - 1103
14. Barcelona Bandits - 905
15. Nuremberg Nightknights - 871
16. Cedar Creek Wildcats - 460
RUSHING
1. Birmingham Cardinals - 1594
2. London Hitmen - 1442
3. Berlin Ballers - 1323
4. Aarhus Stingers - 1218
5. Inverness Highlanders - 901
6. Live Oak Eagles - 824
7. Dublin Dragoons - 708
8. Stockholm Syndrome - 626
9. Paris Colonels - 470
10. Nuremberg Nightknights - 460
11. Mobile Alabama Leprechauns - 442
12. Frankfurt Universe - 268
13. Bordeaux Carlin - 236
14. Barcelona Bandits - 188
15. Bushy Park Badgers - 0
16. Cedar Creek Wildcats - -147.5
TOTAL TOUCHDOWNS FOR
1. London Hitmen - 39
2. Birmingham Cardinals - 34
3. Berlin Ballers - 26
3. Aarhus Stingers - 26
5. Inverness Highlanders - 20
6. Dublin Dragoons - 16
7. Live Oak Eagles - 12
8. Paris Colonels - 11
9. Stockholm Syndrome - 11
10. Mobile Alabama Leprechauns - 9
11. Nuremberg Nightknights - 6
12. Frankfurt Universe - 5
13. Bushy Park Badgers - 3
14. Barcelona Bandits - 2
15. Bordeaux Carlin - 1
16. Cedar Creek Wildcats - 0
DEFENSE
Passing Yards Allowed
1. Berlin Ballers - 612
2. London Hitmen - 761
3. Birmingham Cardinals - 797
4. Live Oak Eagles - 1108
5. Mobile Alabama Leprechauns - 1201
6. Aarhus Stingers - 1204
7. Dublin Dragoons - 1218
8. Inverness Highlanders - 1291
9. Bordeaux Carlin - 1307
10. Bushy Park Badgers - 1333
11. Paris Colonels - 1343
12. Nuremberg Nightknights - 1346
13. Stockholm Syndrome - 1379
14. Barcelona Bandits - 1567
15. Cedar Creek Wildcats - 1615
16. Frankfurt Universe - 1653
Rushing Yards Allowed
1. Berlin Ballers - -137
2. London Hitmen - -70
3. Birmingham Cardinals - 13
4. Aarhus Stingers - 97
5. Inverness Highlanders - 255
6. Live Oak Eagles - 295
7. Stockholm Syndrome - 477
8. Dublin Dragoons - 589
9. Paris Colonels - 602
10. Mobile Alabama Leprechauns - 685
11. Nuremberg Nightknights - 925
12. Frankfurt Universe - 985
13. Bordeaux Carlin - 1082
14. Bushy Park Badgers - 1176
15. Barcelona Bandits - 1191
16. Cedar Creek Wildcats - 2389
Sacks For
1. Berlin Ballers - 38
2. Birmingham Cardinals - 21
3. London Hitmen - 17
4. Aarhus Stingers - 12
5. Live Oak Eagles - 8
6. Inverness Highlanders - 7
6. Mobile Alabama Leprechauns - 7
8. Dublin Dragoons - 5
9. Bordeaux Carlin - 4
10. Barcelona Bandits - 3
10. Paris Colonels - 3
12. Frankfurt Universe - 2
12. Nuremberg Nightknights - 2
12. Stockholm Syndrome - 2
15. Cedar Creek Wildcats - 1
16. Bushy Park Badgers - 0
Interceptions For
1. Berlin Ballers - 23
2. Stockholm Syndrome - 18
3. Aarhus Stingers - 16
3. London Hitmen - 16
5. Birmingham Cardinals - 11
6. Barcelona Bandits - 10
6. Dublin Dragoons - 10
6. Live Oak Eagles - 10
9. Inverness Highlanders - 9
10. Paris Colonels - 8
11. Mobile Alabama Leprechauns - 6
12. Bordeaux Carlin - 5
12. Bushy Park Badgers - 5
12. Nuremberg Nightknights - 5
15. Cedar Creek Wildcats - 2
16. Frankfurt Universe - 0
Total Touchdowns Allowed
1. Berlin Ballers - 0
2. London Hitmen - 1
2. Birmingham Cardinals - 1
4. Aarhus Stingers - 3
5. Inverness Highlanders - 4
6. Stockholm Syndrome - 6
7. Paris Colonels - 8
8. Live Oak Eagles - 9
9. Dublin Dragoons - 10
10. Mobile Alabama Leprechauns - 14
11. Bordeaux Carlin - 15
12. Nuremberg Nightknights - 17
13. Bushy Park Badgers - 18
14. Frankfurt Universe - 22
15. Barcelona Bandits - 28
16. Cedar Creek Wildcats - 65
Moh7
offline
offline
Ofcorse those stats like the original power rankings dont really work, why? Because of games like these:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=42281
Net yards for london 637. Net yards for wildcats 15.....
Its proves something it doesent prove other things.
If we look at londons passing 19/23. Thats good, they gained 250 passing yards, personally i would have passed the whole game. They rushed 61.
Im not here to attack london, i love them as my enemies. Personnaly i love real life football rivalries, the kind that you can goto a party that week and show off a ring to a player from the other team. I cant really make my CB angry and want to hit someone really hard. Stupid sims...
http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=42281
Net yards for london 637. Net yards for wildcats 15.....
Its proves something it doesent prove other things.
If we look at londons passing 19/23. Thats good, they gained 250 passing yards, personally i would have passed the whole game. They rushed 61.
Im not here to attack london, i love them as my enemies. Personnaly i love real life football rivalries, the kind that you can goto a party that week and show off a ring to a player from the other team. I cant really make my CB angry and want to hit someone really hard. Stupid sims...
Menamino
offline
offline
Yeah, games like that definitely skew some stats. But by the end of the year and as more teams play a team like Cedar it'll all even out. That's why I didn't post them any earlier than now.
islanders1986
offline
offline
Originally posted by moh7
If we look at londons passing 19/23. Thats good, they gained 250 passing yards, personally i would have passed the whole game. They rushed 61.
why would you of passed the whole game? You run the ball to kill the clock.
If we look at londons passing 19/23. Thats good, they gained 250 passing yards, personally i would have passed the whole game. They rushed 61.
why would you of passed the whole game? You run the ball to kill the clock.
Moh7
offline
offline
Id pass the whole game cause they gained 250 yards in 19 completions, now imagine if they tried to pass the whole game, Run the clock? Why? I would like just stat pad from teams like this.
tuka
offline
offline
But you have played a team like this, actually, the same team and rushed more then london did.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=42338
http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=42338
lolShowtime
offline
offline
Originally posted by moh7
Id pass the whole game cause they gained 250 yards in 19 completions, now imagine if they tried to pass the whole game, Run the clock? Why? I would like just stat pad from teams like this.
refer to the ppl we dont like in the forum "week 7 ZETA rankings". or whichever one it is.
Id pass the whole game cause they gained 250 yards in 19 completions, now imagine if they tried to pass the whole game, Run the clock? Why? I would like just stat pad from teams like this.
refer to the ppl we dont like in the forum "week 7 ZETA rankings". or whichever one it is.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.





























