Originally posted by iStoner
It takes 5 seconds to put a little number besides 32 teams....
Not if you want the voters to put a little thought into it. It would take time to look over the teams to do a reasonable job of doing a ranking if one was inclined to do that. If the voters only spend 5 seconds on it then I don't really see the point. It would be heavily biased to that voters teams and associated teams. And probably heavily biased based on conferences........just by nature if I don't put any thought into it at all the west would just naturally have higher rankings because I am more familiar with those teams (not that I am going to rank the #5 west team over the #1 east team).
For it to really work then the voters need to participate and cast somewhat reasonable votes......So I only suggest to make the ranking a little easier by only doing top 15 or 20. But it is only a suggestion.................this is your thing feel free to do what you want
It takes 5 seconds to put a little number besides 32 teams....
Not if you want the voters to put a little thought into it. It would take time to look over the teams to do a reasonable job of doing a ranking if one was inclined to do that. If the voters only spend 5 seconds on it then I don't really see the point. It would be heavily biased to that voters teams and associated teams. And probably heavily biased based on conferences........just by nature if I don't put any thought into it at all the west would just naturally have higher rankings because I am more familiar with those teams (not that I am going to rank the #5 west team over the #1 east team).
For it to really work then the voters need to participate and cast somewhat reasonable votes......So I only suggest to make the ranking a little easier by only doing top 15 or 20. But it is only a suggestion.................this is your thing feel free to do what you want