User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Discuss GLB Issues With Catch22 > ISSUES DETERMINED NOT BUGS > Second Wind VA Worthless? -ISSUE DETERMINED NOT A BUG - #515
raiderdav
offline
Link
 
The Center on these two replays has 10 pts in Second Wind - name is "Front and Center".

This was his last play of the third quarter, and he started the play with 61 energy:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1529492&pbp_id=6229701

This is his first play of the 4th quarter, and he starts the play with 61 energy:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1529492&pbp_id=6230104

Shouldn't the equivalent of 100 seconds on the bench give an energy return?
Edited by RMiller517 on Feb 2, 2011 08:57:22
Edited by j_reimy on Feb 2, 2011 08:24:09 (Changed classification)
Edited by Hikariu on Feb 2, 2011 08:09:21
Edited by Hikariu on Feb 2, 2011 08:08:19
 
TrevJo
offline
Link
 
What did he end the last play of the 3rd quarter with?
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
The VA itself works. I did a ton of tests on it with a couple of my players. Its just the fact that Bort's definition of the VA working intended is just not a worthwhile investment of 15 VA's.

Something we have been talking about in this thread today.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=4492393
 
Rikkhen
offline
Link
 
More of a question and a suggestion than a bug imo.
 
Hikariu
offline
Link
 
Not a Bug
 
j_reimy
offline
Link
 
Question more than anything...not a bug though.
 
Dr. E
offline
Link
 
It doesn't work at all. Last season I had a center with the VA and another without, but with about 10 more strength. The one with more strength and no VA, despite having more plays, always ended with the same or more energy.
 
j_reimy
offline
Link
 
I've seen proof of the VA working in the past.
If you're reporting that the VA is not working at all then we will need to see more of the details...comparisons of dots with it and without along with number of plays, their ending energy, and so forth.
 
RMiller517
offline
Link
 
It stinks, but that doesn't mean its a bug.

If you or anybody can come up with some concrete testing numbers to prove otherwise, then this could be looked at again. but this is basically just a suggestion to improve it.
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.