Originally posted by Kotoll
What does it says about coords on a 0-16 team or a 2-14 team with a 1.1k player average. Are the teams similar enough that a fail is just a fail? Or is this a bigger example of lack of coord talent?
1. average player value doesn't tell the whole "roster talent" story, but we already knew that.
2. a fail is always a fail. when is a fail a success? (i'd insert the chin scratchy face, but it'll screw up my spacing, and i can't have that)
3. part coord talent. but you can't ignore coord effort. still a fail... no doubt, just not as directly tied to talent as you seem to want to believe.
What does it says about coords on a 0-16 team or a 2-14 team with a 1.1k player average. Are the teams similar enough that a fail is just a fail? Or is this a bigger example of lack of coord talent?
1. average player value doesn't tell the whole "roster talent" story, but we already knew that.
2. a fail is always a fail. when is a fail a success? (i'd insert the chin scratchy face, but it'll screw up my spacing, and i can't have that)
3. part coord talent. but you can't ignore coord effort. still a fail... no doubt, just not as directly tied to talent as you seem to want to believe.