User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Pee Wee Leagues > Pee Wee Gold League > Gerr's West Predictions...
Page:
 
DirtyMike
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by enasty19
Great write up. However, Dirty is getting a bit hyped up. No disrespect to Mike at all, as he's put together one hell of a team the last 2 seasons and is 14-0, which is what counts. However, if you look at his games, the bad teams are what he struggles with.

PNP (#8 seed) - 28-21, could've easily been the first loss for DI, as they struggled for most of the game and some AI mistakes really cost them.

Lunch Box (#7 seed) - 35-28. Score was closer than the game, however, this is the type of team that they need to blow out or win against big time to prove superiority. DI outplayed them pretty well, outgaining them by 100 yards and controlled more clock.

HHM (No seed) - 28-24. This was a game that really belonged to HHM. But again, DI proves why there are 2 halves. A late PR in the 4th turned the game and DI pulled out a win that was owned by HHM, as they outgained them by 150 yards.

Montipeller (East, #7 seed ATM) - 28-21 in OT. Another game that could've easily gone to Montipeller, but to DI's credit they did outplay them late in the game and that's all that mattered.


Again, these are teams they are supposed to win against convincingly.



My take on this seasons schedules and close games as follows;

vs Montpellier - 28-21, This was a typical game from Montpellier and we have seen this game plan from them several times. You always have to defend the QB run against them and eventually they break one. This time of the season builds are terribad, combined with a Season 16 Defense = a close game. Grind it out on the ground and control TOP = a win in a close game.


vs PNP - 28-21, We didnt change up the passing game much after the Pimps game and ZM game planned well shutting down the Scat Back passing game attack. Unfortunately for them someone didn't check their OAI very well. For this game there had been little changes installed in the Season 16 Defense. It was PNP's game to lose and they did.


vs HHM, 28-24, This time of the season the Sim doesn't like me. Level 6-7 ish my passing game does not exist. HHM played good Defense and almost got the win. i didn't game plan much for this game, there was no reason to think HHM was going to try and show up for this game, bu they did get inspired because of my 17-0 thread and installed a Defense to stop us. They did a good job. It was about this point in the season when most of the new Defense was complete, still tweeking going on.

vs Lunch Box 35-28, TBH the games score was closer than the game itself. We found holes in the LB Defense and pounded the rock. After this game Lunch Box has murdered their opponents. With some pretty strong wins in tournament games. this team is not anything to look past.

Last thing I want to mention is Player building has a huge impact early on in the season. Early in the season my builds are shit. I'm extremely lucky to have made it through the schedule to this point undefeated.
 
enasty19
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by DirtyMike

My take on this seasons schedules and close games as follows;

vs Montpellier - 28-21, This was a typical game from Montpellier and we have seen this game plan from them several times. You always have to defend the QB run against them and eventually they break one. This time of the season builds are terribad, combined with a Season 16 Defense = a close game. Grind it out on the ground and control TOP = a win in a close game.


vs PNP - 28-21, We didnt change up the passing game much after the Pimps game and ZM game planned well shutting down the Scat Back passing game attack. Unfortunately for them someone didn't check their OAI very well. For this game there had been little changes installed in the Season 16 Defense. It was PNP's game to lose and they did.


vs HHM, 28-24, This time of the season the Sim doesn't like me. Level 6-7 ish my passing game does not exist. HHM played good Defense and almost got the win. i didn't game plan much for this game, there was no reason to think HHM was going to try and show up for this game, bu they did get inspired because of my 17-0 thread and installed a Defense to stop us. They did a good job. It was about this point in the season when most of the new Defense was complete, still tweeking going on.

vs Lunch Box 35-28, TBH the games score was closer than the game itself. We found holes in the LB Defense and pounded the rock. After this game Lunch Box has murdered their opponents. With some pretty strong wins in tournament games. this team is not anything to look past.

Last thing I want to mention is Player building has a huge impact early on in the season. Early in the season my builds are shit. I'm extremely lucky to have made it through the schedule to this point undefeated.


Yeah, but like we both said, 14-0 is what matters. You've be able to win the ugly games, and that's what determines a great team from a good/average team. Lunch Box was the only tight game that you actually killed in. Again, congrats on the streak, and if we lose to you guys, I'll be rooting for you guys.
 
Nif
offline
Link
 
I'll spare you all my opinion on the dirty game but it certainly isn't that we got killed or the score made it appear closer than it was. What does that even mean? Its not like they turned the ball over in the endzone or something for a gimme.
 
Bleeds
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Nif
I'll spare you all my opinion on the dirty game but it certainly isn't that we got killed or the score made it appear closer than it was. What does that even mean? Its not like they turned the ball over in the endzone or something for a gimme.


I try to avoid these pissing matches, but I don't see how the score wasn't indicative of how close the game was.

you guys were tied with 9 minutes left in the fourth. one drive away from OT.

i don't understand either of the PWG Mikes sometimes.
 
iStoner
offline
Link
 
apparently just because my defense was weak to 3 run plays and they got called for most of the game to consist of his entire offense, yet my offense/defense still managed to keep it close and almost send it to overtime... i guess we were just that close to being blown out though... he could have run those 3 plays even MORE....
 
DirtyMike
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Stoner DTD
apparently just because my defense was weak to 3 run plays and they got called for most of the game to consist of his entire offense, yet my offense/defense still managed to keep it close and almost send it to overtime... i guess we were just that close to being blown out though... he could have run those 3 plays even MORE....


see this is where you really should think before you open up and let something thats not well thought out go. yes your team played well enough to keep it close (never in any bash LB thread did I say you guys were over rated or comment). but when my team carries the ball for decent yardage (6 YPC) your staying out of the AI that goes vertical down the field as often. so if your defense would of put us in passing situations more, things may have been different.. good or bad, who knows, but I do know my game plan did not count on 6 YPC out of the rushing game.

Edited by DirtyMike on Oct 20, 2010 22:40:00
 
Nif
offline
Link
 
Regardless of what transpired through out the game, it was tied in the fourth quarter. You had a short field... picked up 36 yards on two completions (one hurried and the other deflected) then ran it in the last couple of yards. We proceeded to fail on both sides of the ball on some 4th down conversions and the game was over. GG man but hardly killed us.
 
DirtyMike
offline
Link
 
/matter of opinion.
 
Bleeds
offline
Link
 
Wait, so you didn't think you were gonna do as good as 6 ypc, but you did and despite that still needed a gamewinning drive in the fourth?

/logic?
 
iStoner
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Bleeds
Wait, so you didn't think you were gonna do as good as 6 ypc, but you did and despite that still needed a gamewinning drive in the fourth?

/logic?


The logic is I had one bad defensive play and his auto adjust used that to move the ball against my much better defense, my offense only failed because of a few drops and for that he managed to score one more time than us despite us having a play that he actually averaged about 20 yards per carry against....

If only there was more than one defense we were weak in that game...

Ohh lets not forget we didn't tag that game and only came out in one defense despite our defense clearly having a shit more plays than that.
 
iStoner
offline
Link
 
Not to say I planned on dragging the game you've been "bragging" about through the mud but you get shitstomped and will again in the future... lunchbox is the best and only LE has come close so far because he gameplanned for a game and our offense saw a few more drops than I'd like...


We are the best whether you wanna think it or not... we haven't come CLOSE to losing a game since I took over both sides and started somewhat trying... you guys couldn't beat me last season and won't beat me this season...





PZ Out TO ALL THOSE COMPETING FOR LOTS OF 2nd places.

The first place winner has to pee.
 
zmj44
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by DirtyMike


vs PNP - 28-21, We didnt change up the passing game much after the Pimps game and ZM game planned well shutting down the Scat Back passing game attack. Unfortunately for them someone didn't check their OAI very well. For this game there had been little changes installed in the Season 16 Defense. It was PNP's game to lose and they did.



Perfectly worded, we had it, and careless bullshit in the AI caused us to lose...

 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.