Originally posted by rjssob
What I noticed last season was that when our chemistry was below 70 Overall we struggled badly...4 of our 5 losses were to teams that would not have beaten us at the end of the season, so I would argue that chemistry does play a factor at certain levels. Factor in our newly added lower level players as well, and I think that compounded the issue a little bit but that is an opinion.
I agree with this. GRiTs was a different team at the end of the season.
I think the Dogs worst season was right after we changed the roster a little and started with about 70 chemistry...We played much worse than I thought we should have the first half of the season.
What I noticed last season was that when our chemistry was below 70 Overall we struggled badly...4 of our 5 losses were to teams that would not have beaten us at the end of the season, so I would argue that chemistry does play a factor at certain levels. Factor in our newly added lower level players as well, and I think that compounded the issue a little bit but that is an opinion.
I agree with this. GRiTs was a different team at the end of the season.
I think the Dogs worst season was right after we changed the roster a little and started with about 70 chemistry...We played much worse than I thought we should have the first half of the season.