Originally posted by PackMan97
hmm...maybe I'll ask if we'll do that in a game?
I wouldn't recommend it for your C; just the OP's.
mar, I have no idea, ask him! I was making this recommendation to the OP based on the assumption that he wouldn't care and would just want to get as many pancakes as possible. I also tend to think that a ridiculous G and a C that just gets the job done is a better combination for inside runs than a ridiculous C and a G that just gets the job done, but that's me. Another reason why I'd stick the OP at G and see what develops. If he wants to play his C @ C for the "challenge", or to make his numbers "legit", I guess that's cool too, because if he gets too many pancakes people could be like "OH BUT U R PLAYING G, 0 CREDIBILITY, 0 CARES, PLAY AT C AND EARN THEM THE HARD WAY"
hmm...maybe I'll ask if we'll do that in a game?
I wouldn't recommend it for your C; just the OP's.
mar, I have no idea, ask him! I was making this recommendation to the OP based on the assumption that he wouldn't care and would just want to get as many pancakes as possible. I also tend to think that a ridiculous G and a C that just gets the job done is a better combination for inside runs than a ridiculous C and a G that just gets the job done, but that's me. Another reason why I'd stick the OP at G and see what develops. If he wants to play his C @ C for the "challenge", or to make his numbers "legit", I guess that's cool too, because if he gets too many pancakes people could be like "OH BUT U R PLAYING G, 0 CREDIBILITY, 0 CARES, PLAY AT C AND EARN THEM THE HARD WAY"
Edited by Jack Del Rio on Nov 11, 2009 19:38:25
