Warrior General Games

Originally posted by coachviking
While I agreed with this

Originally posted by coachviking

Originally posted by djgomez33


All 6 USAPL teams make the playoffs...looks right.




At least I didn't say this

Originally posted by Gart888

srsly though, on paper, BFM are the 6th best team in alpha.



Huh? Notice the part where i said "on paper"? Talent wise i'd still put them at 6th in the conference (or would have given their Day 1 roster). Starting the season with 30ish chemistry was just far too much to overcome.

Originally posted by Gart888
Originally posted by coachviking

While I agreed with this

Originally posted by coachviking


Originally posted by djgomez33



All 6 USAPL teams make the playoffs...looks right.




At least I didn't say this

Originally posted by Gart888


srsly though, on paper, BFM are the 6th best team in alpha.



Huh? Notice the part where i said "on paper"? Talent wise i'd still put them at 6th in the conference (or would have given their Day 1 roster). Starting the season with 30ish chemistry was just far too much to overcome.

I hate to disagree here with you Gart BUT if they had the 6th best roster, no matter what their chem was, they wouldn't have been losing games like these:

3-61
3-57
6-125
0-45
0-96
3-56
0-45
0-82

I admit Chem is a factor, not that big of a factor though.

Originally posted by coachviking

I admit Chem is a factor, not that big of a factor though.



I didn't think it was either.

Originally posted by GMathiasf
bump for end of season analysis. Playmakers did ok, but it is clear that a lot of people aren't nearly as smart as they think they are.

Sounds like GLB.

Originally posted by Gart888
Originally posted by thehazyone

Originally posted by seanb1979


That and they wont have any chem issues

With the length of off season and pre-season, few if any teams will have chem issues.

fairly sure BFM will have chem issues >_>

o rly?

Originally posted by Tony Dungy
I noticed Jeff Garcia is gone and Feudel is posting much less. This is why the forum is better.

No one on Krazy posted but me and I'm not going anywhere.

Yeah, luckily some people did make some incorrect predictions.

Originally posted by coachviking
While I agreed with this

Originally posted by coachviking

Originally posted by djgomez33


All 6 USAPL teams make the playoffs...looks right.




At least I didn't say this

Originally posted by Gart888

srsly though, on paper, BFM are the 6th best team in alpha.



meh, there's a lot. Here's a selection of oops! quotes:

Originally posted by Mad Cow
Im sure SEA will rep well again this season

Originally posted by Madd_Maxx
Sofia is winnin this bish!

Originally posted by Weather
Originally posted by bhall43

I could see Durham winning WL



Originally posted by CelticRaider
Anyway I am not here to talk trash about SEAPL (even though Punk Ass Bitch starting running his cock holster). I personally can't wait to slap this Mayan whoever team that I never heard of right in the mouth this season.

Originally posted by CinTex
Tasmania is too strong to miss the playoffs.... I think CCC will also stick around another season.....

Originally posted by marcaodl
Only team that i see taking a playoff spot from any team in the zeta listed on the OP are the Manitoba Matadors.

Originally posted by thehazyone
Of all the non-USAPL teams, I think Manitoba/Manus have the best shot. For the most part, I expect the playoff teams to be returning WPL teams and USAPL teams. So pretty much BFM, SoCal, LSP, Marblehead, Drygerian, Cincy, Monmouth, Lincoln in Alpha and Drinkin, Santiago, MPHD, Stewart, OTR, HHW, 3KW, Bonn, and New Jersey in Zeta which means Manitoba/Manus have their work cut out for them just to make it to the playoffs. It wouldn't surprise me at all to see every single one of the newly promoted teams be one and done in the WPL.


To be fair though...I expected a lot of things that didn't really happen. I do think it just shows how homerism affects our vision of the game. After page 5, SI posted and then the whole thread went to shit with people so there could be some more amazing prognosticating. Oh well..

Originally posted by coachviking
I hate to disagree here with you Gart BUT if they had the 6th best roster, no matter what their chem was, they wouldn't have been losing games like these:

3-61
3-57
6-125
0-45
0-96
3-56
0-45
0-82

I admit Chem is a factor, not that big of a factor though.



you left one out

Originally posted by Wylker
you left one out

no u