eq = wins = more money for stadium and eq. lyon is a season 6 team and the stadium was fucked up that year by the dickhead i brought on as a "financial advisor", yet we will have a max capacity stadium this offseason and can already afford lvl 48 gear.
MadCow420
offline
offline
Originally posted by goldielax25
eq = wins = more money for stadium and eq. lyon is a season 6 team and the stadium was fucked up that year by the dickhead i brought on as a "financial advisor", yet we will have a max capacity stadium this offseason and can already afford lvl 48 gear.
no offense, but i doubt it...
eq = wins = more money for stadium and eq. lyon is a season 6 team and the stadium was fucked up that year by the dickhead i brought on as a "financial advisor", yet we will have a max capacity stadium this offseason and can already afford lvl 48 gear.
no offense, but i doubt it...
Ballinbob
offline
offline
Who invited Goldie to our forum anyways? Crawl back under whatever rock you came from!! 
jace0221
offline
offline
Originally posted by MINTER SHOW!
Which means...he has no players to miss a tackle or anything but does have fail under is belt when it comes to losing to the assassins...according to teams that play in your division.
Also I dont mean my assassins. You get what im saying. No need to target me. Im just going off of what has been said.
Yeah, what is your record? How many G M's you have on your crap 2-9 team? We lost 1 game that we 'should' have won and a 2-9 GM wants to comment? Right, I have no players on the team, so that somehow means something. I had a player on the team, and he's not good enough to play at this level, so we moved him down. And that means something to a bunch of losers with clits onstead of dicks.
Why is the shit talk all come from the teams who can't play .500 ball?
Which means...he has no players to miss a tackle or anything but does have fail under is belt when it comes to losing to the assassins...according to teams that play in your division.
Also I dont mean my assassins. You get what im saying. No need to target me. Im just going off of what has been said.
Yeah, what is your record? How many G M's you have on your crap 2-9 team? We lost 1 game that we 'should' have won and a 2-9 GM wants to comment? Right, I have no players on the team, so that somehow means something. I had a player on the team, and he's not good enough to play at this level, so we moved him down. And that means something to a bunch of losers with clits onstead of dicks.
Why is the shit talk all come from the teams who can't play .500 ball?
Edited by jace0221 on May 16, 2009 16:34:29
Edited by jace0221 on May 16, 2009 16:34:15
Arxo1
offline
offline
Originally posted by jace0221
Originally posted by MINTER SHOW!
Which means...he has no players to miss a tackle or anything but does have fail under is belt when it comes to losing to the assassins...according to teams that play in your division.
Also I dont mean my assassins. You get what im saying. No need to target me. Im just going off of what has been said.
Yeah, what is your record? How many G M's you have on your crap 2-9 team? We lost 1 game that we 'should' have won and a 2-9 GM wants to comment? Right, I have no players on the team, so that somehow means something. I had a player on the team, and he's not good enough to play at this level, so we moved him down. And that means something to a bunch of losers with clits onstead of dicks.
Why is the shit talk all come from the teams who can't play .500 ball?
Great questions. You watch to much Jim Rome. I know because you both talk like bitches. Instead not onstead, but cool tell me how you of all people could make that error.
Originally posted by MINTER SHOW!
Which means...he has no players to miss a tackle or anything but does have fail under is belt when it comes to losing to the assassins...according to teams that play in your division.
Also I dont mean my assassins. You get what im saying. No need to target me. Im just going off of what has been said.
Yeah, what is your record? How many G M's you have on your crap 2-9 team? We lost 1 game that we 'should' have won and a 2-9 GM wants to comment? Right, I have no players on the team, so that somehow means something. I had a player on the team, and he's not good enough to play at this level, so we moved him down. And that means something to a bunch of losers with clits onstead of dicks.
Why is the shit talk all come from the teams who can't play .500 ball?
Great questions. You watch to much Jim Rome. I know because you both talk like bitches. Instead not onstead, but cool tell me how you of all people could make that error.
Edited by Arxo1 on May 16, 2009 16:48:06
Arxo1
offline
offline
Originally posted by dook1e
Originally posted by dook1e
What part of the Bunnies do you run?
Originally posted by dook1e
What part of the Bunnies do you run?
jace0221
offline
offline
Since i'm talking to an idiot, I have speak a way you can understand. Your balls drop yet? If not, go to your mother, she handles balls real good.
What part of Bunnies do I run. If you knew how to read, you'd know. Give you hint: defense. Think you can figure that out, retrad? Suggest you spend time focusing on your player.
What part of Bunnies do I run. If you knew how to read, you'd know. Give you hint: defense. Think you can figure that out, retrad? Suggest you spend time focusing on your player.
madet0rder
offline
offline
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
