God I remember how mad I was when we lost to Ocho Cinco in the first round two seasons ago. Losing sucks. I was PISSED!!!!!
But it is like this every season. One team I'm on had two consecutive losses in the first round as a 2 seed to teams the dominated during the regular season.
I honestly believe the playoff coding is different. I think the confidence requirements are really increased during the playoffs.
Now I can agree with you and say congrats to the teams that won and if you lost I look forward to playing you some more next season.
Originally posted by Davidlando I'm having a great time watching the bickering back and forth about the playoffs.
If you won, congrats. If you lost, better luck next time.
Hilarious stuff! I think the remainder of the playoffs will be very competitive. Congratulations to all who advanced. For the rest of us, back to the ol' drawing board.
Humans are used to the ability to adapt to changing circumstances. Unlike animals, who rarely can recover from mistakes or errors, which are usually fatal, humans can overcome initial mistakes or at least take steps to avoid repeating those mistakes.
GLB permits the GMs to adjust the AI to account for such issues, but the AI is not that great at the moment. (That would be a great scrimmage scenario though. Have 1 team run Strong i 100% of the time, and have the defense run the game's AI all of the time and compare notes afterwards.)
So, what thoughtful GMs are stuck with are guessing games in preparation for their opponents with the inability to correct any mistakes that occur. In a word, the current state of the game is "dehumanizing."
Some people can't accept the game's limitations in that regard. That's too bad. But as my pawpaw always used to say, "Them's the breaks, sonny."
I wonder how Basic AI, 100% run D, 100% inside run D, and 100% Auto Adjust would work, meh won't matter next season Bort's called this "cheese-running" hah
Last edited Mar 31, 2009 10:52:20
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.