User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
jsully75
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by csull36
Not even close. Tackles are basically meaningless if you're on a losing team. Great, everyone else missed a tackle and you made a tackle 20 yards down field. Sacks, Ints, and FFs are much bigger indicators of a good LB...


No, w's are.
 
B3RKSHIRE 69
offline
Link
 
I would have to unbiasedly say dutch schaeffer 99 tackles, 25 forced fumbles, next lb has 19, and 21 pds. not all fumbles were against crap teams either.
 
jsully75
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by B3RKSHIRE 69
I would have to unbiasedly say dutch schaeffer 99 tackles, 25 forced fumbles, next lb has 19, and 21 pds. not all fumbles were against crap teams either.


I would put him up there.
 
jloescher3
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by csull36
Not even close. Tackles are basically meaningless if you're on a losing team. Great, everyone else missed a tackle and you made a tackle 20 yards down field. Sacks, Ints, and FFs are much bigger indicators of a good LB...


include PDs for a ROLB

EDIT: i guess for LOLB too
Last edited Mar 30, 2009 06:33:34
 
chivas
biblioteca n9ne
offline
Link
 
I love how the Generals didn't even brag about him. Rex is one of the best MLB's in the game though. Not just his stats. He is always in the right spot at the right time. Our record aside, we weren't gutted, or scrubs.
 
BayouBobby
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by chivas
I love how the Generals didn't even brag about him. Rex is one of the best MLB's in the game though. Not just his stats. He is always in the right spot at the right time. Our record aside, we weren't gutted, or scrubs.


Gutted....no
Scrubs....absolutely.
 
chivas
biblioteca n9ne
offline
Link
 
Oh no you didnt.

The past two seasons have been underperformed. But that is about to change
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.