Warrior General Games

Originally posted by EricMN
Originally posted by Club America

how abouut you put my two balls in all your mouths

If you just come out of the closet, all that anger may just go *poof*. Although, not sure how far "in the closet" you are when you keep telling other guys to eat your groceries. Just so you know, those aren't "straight" videos you've been watching where that happens.



Hilarious.."eat your grocieries" ...***still laughing in my office***


Does the MN stand for Minnesota??? If so let's snuff T.J. Houshamama...

Originally posted by OchoCinco01
Originally posted by EricMN

Originally posted by Club America


how abouut you put my two balls in all your mouths

If you just come out of the closet, all that anger may just go *poof*. Although, not sure how far "in the closet" you are when you keep telling other guys to eat your groceries. Just so you know, those aren't "straight" videos you've been watching where that happens.

Hilarious.."eat your grocieries" ...***still laughing in my office***

Does the MN stand for Minnesota??? If so let's snuff T.J. Houshamama...


The MN does stand for Minnesota. Housh is a moron for leaving Cincy, where he had an actual top flight WR on the other side leaving him to single coverage. Now he'll just be another overpaid guy playing football. See: Harper, Alvin; Morton, Johnny; Price, Peerless; Burress, Plaxico; and any FA WR ever signed by the Washington Racists.

Originally posted by EricMN
Originally posted by OchoCinco01

Originally posted by EricMN


Originally posted by Club America



how abouut you put my two balls in all your mouths

If you just come out of the closet, all that anger may just go *poof*. Although, not sure how far "in the closet" you are when you keep telling other guys to eat your groceries. Just so you know, those aren't "straight" videos you've been watching where that happens.

Hilarious.."eat your grocieries" ...***still laughing in my office***

Does the MN stand for Minnesota??? If so let's snuff T.J. Houshamama...


The MN does stand for Minnesota. Housh is a moron for leaving Cincy, where he had an actual top flight WR on the other side leaving him to single coverage. Now he'll just be another overpaid guy playing football. See: Harper, Alvin; Morton, Johnny; Price, Peerless; Burress, Plaxico; and any FA WR ever signed by the Washington Racists.

haha, so true. Although I think it was a way smarter decision going to seattle then Minnesota. Yea, minnesota has great running game, but Nate Burleson/deion branch demand some attention too, you can't just double T.J all day cuz those guys will start killing you. The Vikings don't have anyone that demands a defense's attention besides AP. Although it is scary to think how good Minnesota might be with T.J

Originally posted by Aaron330
Originally posted by EricMN

Originally posted by OchoCinco01


Originally posted by EricMN



Originally posted by Club America




how abouut you put my two balls in all your mouths

If you just come out of the closet, all that anger may just go *poof*. Although, not sure how far "in the closet" you are when you keep telling other guys to eat your groceries. Just so you know, those aren't "straight" videos you've been watching where that happens.

Hilarious.."eat your grocieries" ...***still laughing in my office***

Does the MN stand for Minnesota??? If so let's snuff T.J. Houshamama...


The MN does stand for Minnesota. Housh is a moron for leaving Cincy, where he had an actual top flight WR on the other side leaving him to single coverage. Now he'll just be another overpaid guy playing football. See: Harper, Alvin; Morton, Johnny; Price, Peerless; Burress, Plaxico; and any FA WR ever signed by the Washington Racists.

haha, so true. Although I think it was a way smarter decision going to seattle then Minnesota. Yea, minnesota has great running game, but Nate Burleson/deion branch demand some attention too, you can't just double T.J all day cuz those guys will start killing you. The Vikings don't have anyone that demands a defense's attention besides AP. Although it is scary to think how good Minnesota might be with T.J

Hey....careful....can you say Bernard Berrian?????

Berrian is better than Branch or Burleson. TJ went to Seattle for the money, plain and simple.

Originally posted by SteaminWillieBeamin
Berrian is better than Branch or Burleson. TJ went to Seattle for the money, plain and simple.

Just like why BB left Chicago last season......

Originally posted by justinfoster
Originally posted by SteaminWillieBeamin

Berrian is better than Branch or Burleson. TJ went to Seattle for the money, plain and simple.

Just like why BB left Chicago last season......

I'm not saying he's a bad person for doing it, I just think people are crazy if they think it was for any other reason.

Originally posted by justinfoster
Originally posted by SteaminWillieBeamin

Berrian is better than Branch or Burleson. TJ went to Seattle for the money, plain and simple.

Just like why BB left Chicago last season......

No that was because he wanted stability at the quarterback position. That's why he joined the Colts...no wait...

Originally posted by OchoCinco01
Originally posted by Aaron330

Originally posted by EricMN


Originally posted by OchoCinco01



Originally posted by EricMN




Originally posted by Club America





how abouut you put my two balls in all your mouths

If you just come out of the closet, all that anger may just go *poof*. Although, not sure how far "in the closet" you are when you keep telling other guys to eat your groceries. Just so you know, those aren't "straight" videos you've been watching where that happens.

Hilarious.."eat your grocieries" ...***still laughing in my office***

Does the MN stand for Minnesota??? If so let's snuff T.J. Houshamama...


The MN does stand for Minnesota. Housh is a moron for leaving Cincy, where he had an actual top flight WR on the other side leaving him to single coverage. Now he'll just be another overpaid guy playing football. See: Harper, Alvin; Morton, Johnny; Price, Peerless; Burress, Plaxico; and any FA WR ever signed by the Washington Racists.

haha, so true. Although I think it was a way smarter decision going to seattle then Minnesota. Yea, minnesota has great running game, but Nate Burleson/deion branch demand some attention too, you can't just double T.J all day cuz those guys will start killing you. The Vikings don't have anyone that demands a defense's attention besides AP. Although it is scary to think how good Minnesota might be with T.J

Hey....careful....can you say Bernard Berrian?????


Can I say Bernard Berrian? If I wanted to, I would have. Bernard Berrian sucks, I don't know why people even consider him a top receiver. He's totally overrated (by anyone that actually thinks he's good anyways). Burleson is way better than Berrian. Berrian is no better than a Nate Washington or Antwaan Randle El, decent receiver, good at best.

Originally posted by Aaron330
Originally posted by OchoCinco01

Originally posted by Aaron330


Originally posted by EricMN



Originally posted by OchoCinco01




Originally posted by EricMN





Originally posted by Club America






how abouut you put my two balls in all your mouths

If you just come out of the closet, all that anger may just go *poof*. Although, not sure how far "in the closet" you are when you keep telling other guys to eat your groceries. Just so you know, those aren't "straight" videos you've been watching where that happens.

Hilarious.."eat your grocieries" ...***still laughing in my office***

Does the MN stand for Minnesota??? If so let's snuff T.J. Houshamama...


The MN does stand for Minnesota. Housh is a moron for leaving Cincy, where he had an actual top flight WR on the other side leaving him to single coverage. Now he'll just be another overpaid guy playing football. See: Harper, Alvin; Morton, Johnny; Price, Peerless; Burress, Plaxico; and any FA WR ever signed by the Washington Racists.

haha, so true. Although I think it was a way smarter decision going to seattle then Minnesota. Yea, minnesota has great running game, but Nate Burleson/deion branch demand some attention too, you can't just double T.J all day cuz those guys will start killing you. The Vikings don't have anyone that demands a defense's attention besides AP. Although it is scary to think how good Minnesota might be with T.J

Hey....careful....can you say Bernard Berrian?????


Can I say Bernard Berrian? If I wanted to, I would have. Bernard Berrian sucks, I don't know why people even consider him a top receiver. He's totally overrated (by anyone that actually thinks he's good anyways). Burleson is way better than Berrian. Berrian is no better than a Nate Washington or Antwaan Randle El, decent receiver, good at best.

U R my teamate....but U R HIGH...sounds like a bitter Chicago fan. Burleson is better than Berrian?

YOUR BOY BURLESON....
Season Team Receiving Rushing Fumbles
G GS Rec Yds Avg Lng TD Att Yds Avg Lng TD FUM Lost
2008 Seattle Seahawks 1 1 5 60 12.0 20T 1 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2007 Seattle Seahawks 16 12 50 694 13.9 45T 9 2 4 2.0 3 0 3 2
2006 Seattle Seahawks 16 7 18 192 10.7 36 2 -- -- -- -- -- 2 0
2005 Minnesota Vikings 12 9 30 328 10.9 20 1 2 -6 -3.0 -2 0 -- --
2004 Minnesota Vikings 16 15 68 1,006 14.8 68T 9 6 49 8.2 11 0 1 0
2003 Minnesota Vikings 16 9 29 455 15.7 52 2 -- -- -- -- -- 1 1
TOTAL 200 2,735 13.7 68 24 10 47 4.7 11 0 7 3


MY BOY BERRIAN...

Season Team Receiving Rushing Fumbles
G GS Rec Yds Avg Lng TD Att Yds Avg Lng TD FUM Lost
2008 Minnesota Vikings 16 13 48 964 20.1 99T 7 4 26 6.5 14 0 1 1
2007 Chicago Bears 16 15 71 951 13.4 59T 5 -- -- -- -- -- 1 1
2006 Chicago Bears 15 14 51 775 15.2 62 6 2 5 2.5 5 0 2 1
2005 Chicago Bears 11 2 13 246 18.9 54 0 2 31 15.5 37 0 1 0
2004 Chicago Bears 16 1 15 225 15.0 49T 2 8 28 3.5 25 0 -- --
TOTAL 198 3,161 16.0 99 20 16 90 5.6 37 0 5 3

Might want to take your "SUCKS" term and redirect it to your boy Nate. Not even talked about in the top 3 of the Seachickens much less the league. Look up consistency and you see Bernard Berrian's picture. No contest...

Burleson has had 1 good season in his career and that was back in 2004 (because Culpepper was on fire that year).

Berrian has just had 2 consecutive above average years, and helped out the Vikings offense immensely with his ability to stretch the field (and catch the ball, unlike Troy Williamson). If he had QBs other than TJ and Kyle Orton/Rex Grossman throwing him the ball, he'd be getting 1200 yards/year easy.

Originally posted by Aaron330
Can I say Bernard Berrian? If I wanted to, I would have. Bernard Berrian sucks, I don't know why people even consider him a top receiver. He's totally overrated (by anyone that actually thinks he's good anyways). Burleson is way better than Berrian. Berrian is no better than a Nate Washington or Antwaan Randle El, decent receiver, good at best.

Having seen both Burleson and Berrian in person and watched entire seasons of both, I come to one conclusion:

You're high.

Burleson is an adequate - ADEQUATE - third receiver at best. Anyone expecting him to be more than that is smoking something. He's a great route runner but only has okay hands and has below average speed. Put him one-on-one with any cornerback in the NFL not playing for the Dolphins, Bengals or the 49ers and he disappears.

Berrian has never once had a league average QB throwing to him, and it's not like that will change much this season, but look what he's done the past three seasons with the stiffs he's had under center.

No contest.

Originally posted by EricMN
Originally posted by Aaron330

Can I say Bernard Berrian? If I wanted to, I would have. Bernard Berrian sucks, I don't know why people even consider him a top receiver. He's totally overrated (by anyone that actually thinks he's good anyways). Burleson is way better than Berrian. Berrian is no better than a Nate Washington or Antwaan Randle El, decent receiver, good at best.

Having seen both Burleson and Berrian in person and watched entire seasons of both, I come to one conclusion:

You're high.

Burleson is an adequate - ADEQUATE - third receiver at best. Anyone expecting him to be more than that is smoking something. He's a great route runner but only has okay hands and has below average speed. Put him one-on-one with any cornerback in the NFL not playing for the Dolphins, Bengals or the 49ers and he disappears.

Berrian has never once had a league average QB throwing to him, and it's not like that will change much this season, but look what he's done the past three seasons with the stiffs he's had under center.

No contest.

not playing for the Dolphins, Bengals, or 49ers? The 49ers have two of the best corners in the game in Nate Clements and Walt Harris. Their safeties aren't that great so they give up the deep stuff sometimes, but corner is not the issue in SF.

And back to Berrian, I don't care what you guys say. I've watched TONS of film on both guys. I've never once been impressed with bernard Berrian. He's taller than Burleson, and probably has better hands, so thats why he's a deep threat. But Burleson runs FAR better routes and runs with the ball after catch a whole league better than Berrian, plus he's younger. Like I said, Berrian is a decent-good receiver at best.

But for the record, Burleson is not MY BOY. I hate the seahawks, I actually hate Nate Burleson too, I'm just calling it how I see it.

Originally posted by Aaron330


not playing for the Dolphins, Bengals, or 49ers? The 49ers have two of the best corners in the game in Nate Clements and Walt Harris. Their safeties aren't that great so they give up the deep stuff sometimes, but corner is not the issue in SF.

And back to Berrian, I don't care what you guys say. I've watched TONS of film on both guys. I've never once been impressed with bernard Berrian. He's taller than Burleson, and probably has better hands, so thats why he's a deep threat. But Burleson runs FAR better routes and runs with the ball after catch a whole league better than Berrian, plus he's younger. Like I said, Berrian is a decent-good receiver at best.

But for the record, Burleson is not MY BOY. I hate the seahawks, I actually hate Nate Burleson too, I'm just calling it how I see it.

Walt Harris is not one of the best corners in the game and Clements is overrated. But that is neither here not there.

As a Vikings fan, I've seen both play extensively. Berrian is by far the more dangerous player and is considerably faster. Berrian actually run very good routes, and is great at turning a medium pass into an 80 yard touchdown, as he did on several occasions with the Vikings this season. Burleson is less than a year younger, so I don't think that's much of a factor.

For a "decent" WR, he's done a lot more with a lot less than Burleson has in his career. Berrian can play the #1 WR and Burleson has struggled every time he's been put in that role. It's not even close, look at the stats. Burleson has done nothing since Seattle overpaid for him.