User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Canadian A Leagues > Canadian A #6 > Power Rankings Week 1
sickie8305
offline
Link
 
Hope this wakes up the forum

After last season I got good reviews so I will do it again, let the figures work out before you start tripping on the standings...

How this works is the total scores VS. the quality of team you play so if you played a good team and beat them expect a better score if you play a weaker team you will not get that much of a boost....

EAST
WEST

Rank.....Rating..........Standings..........Team
*********************************************************************
1..........101.938..........(1-0-0)..........St. Clair Hounds

2..........101.878..........(1-0-0)..........Calgary Thunder
3..........101.621..........(1-0-0)..........Moose Jaw Blazers
4..........101.507..........(1-0-0)..........Victoria Mule Train
5..........101.463..........(1-0-0)..........St. John Saints
6..........101.463..........(1-0-0)..........In San Jose Pimpin Aint Easy
7..........101.167..........(1-0-0)..........Unconventional Warfare
8..........101.126..........(1-0-0)..........Cross City Renegades
9..........100.884..........(1-0-0)..........Red River Wolverines

10........100.827..........(1-0-0)..........Edmonton Slashers
11........100.812..........(1-0-0)..........Medicine Hat Blackfoots
12........100.622..........(1-0-0)..........Bloodwesier Bugle All Stars
13........100.453..........(1-0-0)..........Ottawa Riders
14........100.290..........(1-0-0)..........Saskatchewan Mounties
15........100.290..........(1-0-0)..........Las Vegas Beast
16........100.100..........(1-0-0)..........Northside Juggernauts
17..........99.900..........(0-1-0)..........Barkmere Bulldawgs
18..........99.710..........(0-1-0)..........Olmsted Falls Browns CPU
19..........99.710..........(0-1-0)..........Sainte-Foy Nordiques
20..........99.547..........(0-1-0)..........Michigan Mastadons

21..........99.378..........(0-1-0)..........Chilliwack Bruins
22..........99.188..........(0-1-0)..........Montreal Black Lightning
23..........99.173..........(0-1-0)..........Thunder Bay Thunderheads

24..........99.116..........(0-1-0)..........Yukon Nightmare
25..........98.874..........(0-1-0)..........Kelowna Outlaws
26..........98.833..........(0-1-0)..........Saguenay Falcons
27..........98.537..........(0-1-0)..........Millenium Falcons
28..........98.537..........(0-1-0)..........Wrightstown Tigers
29..........98.493..........(0-1-0)..........Quebec Boreal
30..........98.379..........(0-1-0)..........Dilon Phantons
31..........98.122..........(0-1-0)..........New Jax City Hustlers

32..........98.062..........(0-1-0)..........Windsor Black Knights

Last edited Feb 26, 2009 06:56:32
 
Nirav
offline
Link
 
Very cool Sickie. Too bad we play Moose Jaw next.
 
GaDawg
offline
Link
 
Pshuh! The Black Knights should be ranked #30 at least!
 
CDZYO
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by GaDawg
Pshuh! The Black Knights should be ranked #30 at least!


I like the way you undersold that -- nice!
 
SE49erFan
offline
Link
 
Cross City should be able to stay in the top 10!
 
Link
 
Thank for the rankings. I always love seeing how the teams look and follow my favorites throughout the year.
 
Link
 
Thanks Sickie.....

Surprised to see your team so low...expect to see you only go up from there!

Best of luck everyone in week 2!
 
gatch71
offline
Link
 
What is the formula?

The 32nd ranked team lost by 6 points. Logically therefore any team that beats a team ranked above the 32nd ranked team by more than 6 points should be ranked above the team that beat the 32nd ranked team (following me so far?!)

Well, the team that beat the 32nd ranked team by 6 points is ranked No 1 but the team that beat the team ranked in 19th by 82 points is ranked number 14. Work that one out.

Doesn't really matter at this stage. Just interested in the logic.
 
basshound3
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by gatch71
What is the formula?

The 32nd ranked team lost by 6 points. Logically therefore any team that beats a team ranked above the 32nd ranked team by more than 6 points should be ranked above the team that beat the 32nd ranked team (following me so far?!)

Well, the team that beat the 32nd ranked team by 6 points is ranked No 1 but the team that beat the team ranked in 19th by 82 points is ranked number 14. Work that one out.

Doesn't really matter at this stage. Just interested in the logic.


Sainte-Foye is too high is what you're getting at?
 
CDZYO
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by basshound3
Originally posted by gatch71

What is the formula?

The 32nd ranked team lost by 6 points. Logically therefore any team that beats a team ranked above the 32nd ranked team by more than 6 points should be ranked above the team that beat the 32nd ranked team (following me so far?!)

Well, the team that beat the 32nd ranked team by 6 points is ranked No 1 but the team that beat the team ranked in 19th by 82 points is ranked number 14. Work that one out.

Doesn't really matter at this stage. Just interested in the logic.


Olmsted Falls is too high is what you're getting at?


fyp. Just because I stuffed my face with Pizza! Pizza! yesterday doesn't mean that I'm not reading the forums...

Edit: If I had to guess, I'd say that the rankings look inverted (#17-#32 should be #32-#17, and #1-#16 should be #16-#1), but that's just a guess.
Last edited Feb 26, 2009 15:50:14
 
sickie8305
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by gatch71
What is the formula?

The 32nd ranked team lost by 6 points. Logically therefore any team that beats a team ranked above the 32nd ranked team by more than 6 points should be ranked above the team that beat the 32nd ranked team (following me so far?!)

Well, the team that beat the 32nd ranked team by 6 points is ranked No 1 but the team that beat the team ranked in 19th by 82 points is ranked number 14. Work that one out.

Doesn't really matter at this stage. Just interested in the logic.


give it some time to work itself out, thanks
 
Seano
offline
Link
 
I'm sure it'll sort itself out when it gets more data. Thanks sickie
Last edited Feb 26, 2009 19:08:44
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.