Warrior General Games

Originally posted by kristof65
Originally posted by LithoMan

But, promo's dont think they have a chance to win endorsements at their next level, of course which is dumb also.
That's definitely not true though. I've done up a "Fame Snapshot" at the beginning of each season since Fame started for our team, and at the same time, I looked at how my punter ranks with others of his position in the league. I don't recall how my guy was stacked with the rest of BBB #8 last year, but this year he was the second most famous for his position in A#4. Heck half the top ten for his position came from AA #2, BBB #7 or BBB #8.

It might be a little different for other positions, but I'd think that the demoted teams would be more likely to be shafted than the promoted teams. After all, a lot of the promoted players will have just gotten some sort of trophy.

I think endorsements need to be lotteried among only the top ten players for each position in each league at the beginning of the season, last for one season only, and automatically go to someone else if that player leads the league.

But Sprocket's idea is a good one, too.


I like your idea. I am all for whatever, I just want league endorsements, to stay in the league.... not have upper tiers live off their past, because they are intimidated by their new surroundings (aka Dusty Ass). Notice, he thinks that A4 owes his relic ass something, because he populated it since it was started... Some people just cant get out of their own way...

Originally posted by DrunkenCowboy
Originally posted by Sprocket

I think it overcomplicated. It would be far easier to base sponsorship directly from Fame.

In order to recieve an endorsement offer, a player needs 300 fame. For each 300 fame, there will be another offer. So, a player with 900 fame would get 3 offers to choose one from. Of course, the higher the fame, the sweeter the deals.

Naturally, fame points would have to be relevant to awards and championships, etc.

Everyone would have endorsements and there would be no point then IMO, it would just be standard equipment.

I think what Bort also did is calculate the amount of fame accrued in one season and add that into the formula.

Your such a douche Dusty.... nobody is trying to strip you of your fame or stats, we just want you to give back our endorsements you stole out of A4. Go compete at your level for the endorsement. What, things not look so good up their.... You afraid you going to be in AA for another 5 seasons while teams pass you by?

Originally posted by LithoMan
Originally posted by DrunkenCowboy

Originally posted by Sprocket


I think it overcomplicated. It would be far easier to base sponsorship directly from Fame.

In order to recieve an endorsement offer, a player needs 300 fame. For each 300 fame, there will be another offer. So, a player with 900 fame would get 3 offers to choose one from. Of course, the higher the fame, the sweeter the deals.

Naturally, fame points would have to be relevant to awards and championships, etc.

Everyone would have endorsements and there would be no point then IMO, it would just be standard equipment.

I think what Bort also did is calculate the amount of fame accrued in one season and add that into the formula.

Your such a douche Dusty.... nobody is trying to strip you of your fame or stats, we just want you to give back our endorsements you stole out of A4. Go compete at your level for the endorsement. What, things not look so good up their.... You afraid you going to be in AA for another 5 seasons while teams pass you by?

so much rage

The thing I don't like about the new setup is the guy who gets an endorsement in AA will get BBB level eq, so will the guys in A, and BBB. At least that is the way the 2 levels lower thing reads to me unless Bort plans to do a BBB -1 and BBB -2 seq of some sort?