Deion McNasty is just happy to be mentioned and is also happy to be in a 3 way tie for league leader in INTs!
per.lilja
offline
offline
Bein a part of this league rocks!
So many dedicted inspired hype builders!
Can we take all of you with us to the Pros?
So many dedicted inspired hype builders!
Can we take all of you with us to the Pros?
ahnonamis
offline
offline
Originally posted by stizz
NTs get no love.
Tell me about it. Especially when most of their sacks don't count because the system doesn't recognize a forced fumble on the QB as a sack.
NTs get no love.
Tell me about it. Especially when most of their sacks don't count because the system doesn't recognize a forced fumble on the QB as a sack.
Buzzkill
offline
offline
It does ahnon, but not if the system recognized the play being called as a run play.
Gott
offline
offline
My team had two forced fumbles on sacks a couple games ago, but neither DT got credit for them. They were obvious pass plays.
ahnonamis
offline
offline
Originally posted by Buzzkill
It does ahnon, but not if the system recognized the play being called as a run play.
It doesn't. Bort has admitted that he put it wrong, it just hasn't been fixed yet.
It does ahnon, but not if the system recognized the play being called as a run play.
It doesn't. Bort has admitted that he put it wrong, it just hasn't been fixed yet.
Buzzkill
offline
offline
hmm...guess ive overlooked a post somewhere, which is unthinkable with the amount of time im on here lol
caponesgun
offline
offline
Originally posted by Buzzkill
hmm...guess ive overlooked a post somewhere, which is unthinkable with the amount of time im on here lol
I saw it somewhere, so yeah it exists. It's incredibly hard to code that specific, not sure how hard it would be to fix..might be waiting for another offseason so all stats are equal...but they changed passing
hmm...guess ive overlooked a post somewhere, which is unthinkable with the amount of time im on here lol
I saw it somewhere, so yeah it exists. It's incredibly hard to code that specific, not sure how hard it would be to fix..might be waiting for another offseason so all stats are equal...but they changed passing
lorato
offline
offline
Originally posted by ahnonamis
Originally posted by stizz
NTs get no love.
Tell me about it. Especially when most of their sacks don't count because the system doesn't recognize a forced fumble on the QB as a sack.
I knew I would forget a couple key positions and stats. I'll add it that in on my next team piece.
Any suggestions for what/who I should cover are more than welcome!
Originally posted by stizz
NTs get no love.
Tell me about it. Especially when most of their sacks don't count because the system doesn't recognize a forced fumble on the QB as a sack.
I knew I would forget a couple key positions and stats. I'll add it that in on my next team piece.
Any suggestions for what/who I should cover are more than welcome!
Buzzkill
offline
offline
I say cover the backup RB from the top ranked team! This suggestion obviously has no bias at all...i promise! 
Seriously though, i would have to agree that covering the big matchup/s each week is a safe bet at good reading, but go with the GM/OC/DCs as it will give everyone some insight to what makes these guys tick....just dont try to weasel too much info out of them or its likely to be a boring interview when they "no comment" everything lol

Seriously though, i would have to agree that covering the big matchup/s each week is a safe bet at good reading, but go with the GM/OC/DCs as it will give everyone some insight to what makes these guys tick....just dont try to weasel too much info out of them or its likely to be a boring interview when they "no comment" everything lol
caponesgun
offline
offline
Originally posted by Buzzkill
I say cover the backup RB from the top ranked team! This suggestion obviously has no bias at all...i promise!
Seriously though, i would have to agree that covering the big matchup/s each week is a safe bet at good reading, but go with the GM/OC/DCs as it will give everyone some insight to what makes these guys tick....just dont try to weasel too much info out of them or its likely to be a boring interview when they "no comment" everything lol
I thought DC meant my team for a second LOL
also, lorato....feel free to contact Vawn for this if you want to. Avoid using our new GM for that reason
I say cover the backup RB from the top ranked team! This suggestion obviously has no bias at all...i promise!

Seriously though, i would have to agree that covering the big matchup/s each week is a safe bet at good reading, but go with the GM/OC/DCs as it will give everyone some insight to what makes these guys tick....just dont try to weasel too much info out of them or its likely to be a boring interview when they "no comment" everything lol
I thought DC meant my team for a second LOL
also, lorato....feel free to contact Vawn for this if you want to. Avoid using our new GM for that reason

Gott
offline
offline
Originally posted by Buzzkill
I say cover the backup RB from the top ranked team! This suggestion obviously has no bias at all...i promise!
Do you even know who the Burglars' backup HB is?
I say cover the backup RB from the top ranked team! This suggestion obviously has no bias at all...i promise!
Do you even know who the Burglars' backup HB is?
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.




























