User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > USA A Leagues > USA A #7 > USA A7: RPI Rankings Post Week 7 and Projections for Week 8
josh2otter
offline
Link
 
I won't be around tomorrow so I thought I would just post them now... HORRAY THE DEMONIK GET A BYE WEEK!

Rk______Team____________________RPI____O%____OO%__W__L__
1..Anchorage Maulers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .656 . . . .524 . . . . .575 . . . . 7 . . 0
2..Bay Area Bombers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .643 . . . .500 . . . . .571 . . . . 7 . . 0
3..Roswell Space Pirates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .622 . . . .548 . . . . .534 . . . . 6 . . 1
4..RGB Berzerk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .615 . . . .571 . . . . .459 . . . . 6 . . 1
5..Chicago Thunder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .611 . . . .690 . . . . .490 . . . . 4 . . 3
6..Carolina Bar Stars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .538 . . . .643 . . . . .439 . . . . 3 . . 4
7..Grand Haven Mist . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .516 . . . .476 . . . . .541 . . . . 4 . . 3
8..Philadelphia Demonik . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .504 . . . .452 . . . . .541 . . . . 4 . . 3
9..Compton Colt .45s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .496 . . . .548 . . . . .459 . . . . 3 . . 4
10..San Diego Blaze . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .493 . . . .452 . . . . .497 . . . . 4 . . 3
11..Oakville Nungas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .463 . . . .548 . . . . .469 . . . . 2 . . 5
12..Atlantis Whitecaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .435 . . . .476 . . . . .500 . . . . 2 . . 5
13..ORLY OWLS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .428 . . . .452 . . . . .520 . . . . 2 . . 5
14..Austin Cyber-Demons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .420 . . . .548 . . . . .442 . . . . 1 . . 6
15..Houston Space Cowboys . . . . . . . . . . . . . .373 . . . .333 . . . . .541 . . . . 2 . . 5
16..Tallahassee Teabaggers . . . . . . . . . . . . . .321 . . . .381 . . . . .524 . . . . 0 . . 7

Rk______Team____________________RPI____O%____OO%__W__L__
1..Holly Tornadoes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .644 . . . .476 . . . . .622 . . . . 7 . . 0
2..Savannah Seahawks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .591 . . . .595 . . . . .459 . . . . 5 . . 2
3..Miami ROADFROGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .589 . . . .548 . . . . .548 . . . . 5 . . 2
4..Hell's Ambush . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .550 . . . .643 . . . . .486 . . . . 3 . . 4
5..New Hampshire Hounds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .531 . . . .714 . . . . .412 . . . . 2 . . 5
6..North Carolina Lighthouses . . . . . . . . . . . .530 . . . .357 . . . . .548 . . . . 6 . . 1
7..New Orleans Drunken Skulls . . . . . . . . . . . .530 . . . .619 . . . . .452 . . . . 3 . . 4
8..All The King's Men . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .523 . . . .357 . . . . .520 . . . . 6 . . 1
9..Seattle Bluehawks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .497 . . . .571 . . . . .415 . . . . 3 . . 4
10..South Beach Tokers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .491 . . . .333 . . . . .585 . . . . 5 . . 2
11..New Orleans Golden Kangaroos . . . . . . . . .491 . . . .571 . . . . .395 . . . . 3 . . 4
12..Philadelphia Brokebacks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .435 . . . .357 . . . . .599 . . . . 3 . . 4
13..Buffalo Badasses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .392 . . . .405 . . . . .473 . . . . 2 . . 5
14..Brooklyn Legacy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .372 . . . .310 . . . . .582 . . . . 2 . . 5
15..East Tennessee Elite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .358 . . . .524 . . . . .384 . . . . 0 . . 7
16..CAROLINA WOLF PACK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .343 . . . .476 . . . . .418 . . . . 0 . . 7


Philadelphia Demonik vs Austin Cyber-Demons (100-16) Spread: 84
Atlantis Whitecaps vs Carolina Bar Stars (26-50) Spread: 24
Chicago Thunder vs Compton Colt .45s (34-23) Spread: 11
ORLY OWLS vs RGB Berzerk (19-76) Spread: 57
RGB Berzerk vs ORLY OWLS (76-19) Spread: 57
Compton Colt .45s vs Chicago Thunder (23-34) Spread: 11
Carolina Bar Stars vs Atlantis Whitecaps (50-26) Spread: 24
Austin Cyber-Demons vs Philadelphia Demonik (16-100) Spread: 84
Oakville Nungas vs Anchorage Maulers (19-52) Spread: 33
San Diego Blaze vs Tallahassee Teabaggers (106-4) Spread: 102
Roswell Space Pirates vs Houston Space Cowboys (65-21) Spread: 44
Bay Area Bombers vs Grand Haven Mist (52-22) Spread: 30
Houston Space Cowboys vs Roswell Space Pirates (21-65) Spread: 44
Tallahassee Teabaggers vs San Diego Blaze (4-106) Spread: 102
Anchorage Maulers vs Oakville Nungas (52-19) Spread: 33
Grand Haven Mist vs Bay Area Bombers (22-52) Spread: 30

Buffalo Badasses vs New Hampshire Hounds (22-46) Spread: 24
North Carolina Lighthouses vs Savannah Seahawks (23-36) Spread: 13
All The King's Men vs Philadelphia Brokebacks (51-23) Spread: 28
CAROLINA WOLF PACK vs East Tennessee Elite (44-18) Spread: 26
New Orleans Golden Kangaroos vs Seattle Bluehawks (50-30) Spread: 20
Seattle Bluehawks vs New Orleans Golden Kangaroos (30-50) Spread: 20
East Tennessee Elite vs CAROLINA WOLF PACK (18-44) Spread: 26
New Hampshire Hounds vs Buffalo Badasses (46-22) Spread: 24
Savannah Seahawks vs North Carolina Lighthouses (36-23) Spread: 13
New Orleans Drunken Skulls vs South Beach Tokers (28-49) Spread: 21
Hell's Ambush vs Brooklyn Legacy (24-9) Spread: 15
Miami ROADFROGS vs Holly Tornadoes (20-51) Spread: 31
Philadelphia Brokebacks vs All The King's Men (23-51) Spread: 28
Holly Tornadoes vs Miami ROADFROGS (51-20) Spread: 31
Brooklyn Legacy vs Hell's Ambush (9-24) Spread: 15
South Beach Tokers vs New Orleans Drunken Skulls (49-28) Spread: 21


OTTER
 
Weykool
offline
Link
 
Josh:

You're killing me here.
We win our game and Roswell loses but they pass RGB?
I know its just rankings but come on....even the BCS doesnt make those kinds of errors.
 
TtD
offline
Link
 
They played a 7-0 team, is the only reason they made such a big jump, same reason we'll drop from 1st after next game having to play Oakyville.
 
futuregm
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Weykool
Josh:

You're killing me here.
We win our game and Roswell loses but they pass RGB?
I know its just rankings but come on....even the BCS doesnt make those kinds of errors.


Who's the "whiner" now. Geez you guys are a bunch of haters. Accuse me of bitching and you are even worse.

Like I said, I am doing my talking on the field from now on. 1st step is complete, beat Roswell.
 
Weykool
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by TtD
They played a 7-0 team, is the only reason they made such a big jump, same reason we'll drop from 1st after next game having to play Oakyville.


But if you win and Bay Area loses then dropping you to #2 would be absurd.
7-0 with no quality wins doesnt mean all that much either.

 
futuregm
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Weykool
Originally posted by TtD

They played a 7-0 team, is the only reason they made such a big jump, same reason we'll drop from 1st after next game having to play Oakyville.


But if you win and Bay Area loses then dropping you to #2 would be absurd.
7-0 with no quality wins doesnt mean all that much either.



Oh god you are so full of it. Now Roswell isn't a quality win. That just proves you are just a freakin hater. Can't wait till we play you, I asked you to send me a scrimmage so we can prove who is better, but I received no such offer. I can't send one because I have too many pending. I have one against Holly next that will be a tough, tough game. I don't make the schedule I just play it.

All that matters is the "W" and right now Bay Area is tied for the most in this league.
 
josh2otter
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Weykool
Josh:

You're killing me here.
We win our game and Roswell loses but they pass RGB?
I know its just rankings but come on....even the BCS doesnt make those kinds of errors.


Yeah, the more winning teams you play the higher your RPI is. Look at college basketball, a team can be 8-6 and be 50 places higher in the RPI then some teams with 12+ wins...

Since everyone plays the same people except for the first game of the season the RPI gets to be a little bit weak, especially if you played a cupcake in game 1...

I'll go update the Projected standings and you'll see some movement up at the top, it's really interesting
 
pksskulls
offline
Link
 
wow tokers 21 up? hm
 
Weykool
offline
Link
 
Shouldnt the ranking be trying to indicate the reletive strength and weakness of teams?
If it is just a matter of giving us data as to what has happened then what good is it?
If the rankings have to wait until the season is played to correct itself then why not just look at the stadnings?
It seems to me that some subjective intervention needs to be used.
I know we gave Dawgs a hard time about his rankings but other than his bias for his own team(and dissing RGB) they were generally pretty accurate.
 
josh2otter
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Weykool
Shouldnt the ranking be trying to indicate the reletive strength and weakness of teams?
If it is just a matter of giving us data as to what has happened then what good is it?
If the rankings have to wait until the season is played to correct itself then why not just look at the stadnings?
It seems to me that some subjective intervention needs to be used.
I know we gave Dawgs a hard time about his rankings but other than his bias for his own team(and dissing RGB) they were generally pretty accurate.


If you look at it with just one conference in mind then it's pretty lame. I like to look at both conferences and compare RPI amongst them, I could run a combined A7 rpi with no conference seperation in order to give people more to speculate on. Would guys rather have that?
 
futuregm
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by josh2otter
Originally posted by Weykool

Shouldnt the ranking be trying to indicate the reletive strength and weakness of teams?
If it is just a matter of giving us data as to what has happened then what good is it?
If the rankings have to wait until the season is played to correct itself then why not just look at the stadnings?
It seems to me that some subjective intervention needs to be used.
I know we gave Dawgs a hard time about his rankings but other than his bias for his own team(and dissing RGB) they were generally pretty accurate.


If you look at it with just one conference in mind then it's pretty lame. I like to look at both conferences and compare RPI amongst them, I could run a combined A7 rpi with no conference seperation in order to give people more to speculate on. Would guys rather have that?


I think sometimes people forget this is a COMPUTER simulation GAME. The numbers matter here. Because it's SIM. LOL
 
Tree
offline
Link
 
weykool, you're such a hater. omg. h8er.
 
awooga
offline
Link
 
Hater!
 
Weykool
offline
Link
 
Note to my hating self....move Tree and Awooga down the depth chart.
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.